Once again a non-answer, implying there isn't anything you know that would change anything about the knowledge those who weren't there have. It seems to me you're simply introducing irrelevant red herrings in order to try to sidetrack the discussion. If you had any unique relevant information based on your claim of allegedly being present at GZ on 9/11, you would have posted it. That brings into question the validity of your claim of being there. I personally am very interested in 9/11 eyewitness accounts, particularly if any of these accounts introduce any new information. You haven't stated any that I'm aware of.
Less foolish than your reply which purports you have knowledge yet you have no substance. You are a ghost, a phantom seeking attention by the purporting of knowledge you don't have.
Actually, You lot can believe anything you wish, I am still suffering the after effects of my exposure at Ground Zero. In the Months that followed, I attended briefings and meetings about 9/11 and survivor conferences all closed door no press events, and non of the conspiracy were ever validated at those meetings.
That goes without saying. I'm so sorry (if true), so are many others who are still alive and all deserve to know the truth. They were all lied to about the safety of Ground Zero and were all needlessly victimized and one could say some were murdered by these lying scum. And why do you suppose that was? Was there something to hide from the public? I seriously doubt the purpose of such meetings (if indeed you were present), was to validate any conspiracy. So what is your point?
I was googling around and I came across this. http://www.911babystep.com/ I just wanted people to see it so I'm posting it on the first thread about building seven that I could find.