It is wrong to do an 'intellectual' or 'statistical' roundup and drive people up the chute into railcars with longhorns all driven together and shorthorns all driven and Angus all driven together with each classification of differences boxed in together homogenized for the different kinds. This is an individual choice for a relationship individual to individual. Freedom. People are not beeves. I'd do away with the minimum wage completely also. And get rid of nutty immigration policies and illegal aliens, and wages will rise.
In America, perhaps. Elsewhere it's often the reverse. Black men have their pick of the crop. Young black men actually say that only white men are prepared to put up with ugly/obese women. Naughty!
Exactly this. It's just the old mating game, writ large. Women like big(ger) masculine men, men like small(er) feminine women. Nature.
As some posters have touched upon this probably has to do with masculinity/femininity. Generally the case is that Blacks of both genders have more masculine features which is to the advantage of Black men (and disadvantage of Black women) and for Asians, the femininity/unmasculinity means an advantage for the women and disadvantage for the men. I am not sure about this, but isn't it the case that obesity is especially prevalent amongst Afram women? If so, it surely is a contributing factor to why White men "don't desire" Black women as well (assuming we are regarding the issue in an American context).
We have a smaller African diaspora (primarily Horners) here in Sweden and the general trend seems to be that they are very endogamous people where even their children (2nd generation immigrants) normally don't "marry out". I would say that the few times I have noticed mixed couples, the cases of it being black man/white woman and white man/black woman are about just as many. With Swedes marrying outside their ethnicity, the trend seems to be that it is much more common with a Foreign man dating a Swedish woman than it is with a Swedish man dating a Foreign woman. I suppose the explanation for this certain case is more culture than nature; the largest immigrant group are Middle Easterners/Muslims and they very often prefer to control their daughters more than they control their sons.
Black men have a much wider level of tolerance. http://0.media.collegehumor.cvcdn.com/7/d/collegehumor.ca84af4700e84db8fa80d90d476bbf5a.jpg I actually overheard a Black guy say once "I don't want no skinny ass white woman". Not saying all Black guys feel this way, or course, but it is very revealing about the culture and what are seen as sexually desirable attributes. His girlfriend at the time (I got the opportunity to see her once) was a short Mexican lady with a big rear end. He was pretty dark though. It might be interesting if there was a study looking at how the racial preferences of African American men vary depending on their skin color. It's possible the ones that are a little bit less dark are statistically more likely to have preference toward a white woman. (and would make sense because they would have more white DNA)
Neuroplasticity (in my argument) pertains specifically to IQ. The mating urge is rather more base, Dear
No, I'm saying that those who indulge in 'sex tourism' are desperados. And since they're paying for it, they can go straight to the most overt representations of male/female available. This usually means black men and Asian women. We all have those preferences, but desperados (AKA ugly/old/loser) go extreme .. because they're paying.
I think the Black guy had a point, if he didn't take it too far, as a lot of white women look like Twiggy, that is, death warmed over with a couple of silicon apples.
This will be a tasteless post. Can't remember the site. I think it was some prog site about dating interracially. You know how there are stereotypes abut men's sizes based upon race? This was about a study on women based on race. They found black women to be the longest, yet narrowest. Mexicans were the widest. Asians were shortest and narrowest. Whites or Europeans were wider than blacks, not as wide as Mexican and shorter than balcks yet longer ans wdier than Asians. Don't blame me for this study. I just couldn't take my eyes off of it. I admit morbid curiosity. No, I don't know if it was accurate. There were references to doctors.....or was that playing doctor? lol Anyway, take it for what it's worth.
Not necessarily. The problem is men can do nothing with what they are born with. It is what it is. Finding someone who wants it is the tough part. Size is not as important as other things, yet it will cause a breakup or a second or third choice. Women do change size and can strengthen muscles, but basically it won't get any narrower and a man won't get any thicker. So, whatever.
They make huge toys and clit vibrators. You can also fist her, if she's into any of it. Then, she can give you oral. There are ways, but they don't really satisfy a man, only the woman who is into that.
Clits? Or was it the fisting? I'm guessing one of those is popular and the other, not so much. My sampling is very small.
Your whole damn comment was too graphic, kind of gross and totally misplaced. This is not a sex forum.
Nah, the question was about inequalities in the interracial dating sphere. It's quite appropriate to talk about all differences, including cultures, physicality, sexual differences, and family makeup. I simply chose one not discussed, yet.
More white women have been taken in by the propaganda than white men. Asian men's physiques aren't exactly what Western standards hold as manly, plus there's a pervasive stereotype about Asian penis size. A lot of white guys with Asian females tend to be nerdy/ugly/dirty types, kind of like how most white females with blacks are fat/ugly/pockmarked. It seems that white social rejects tend to gravitate where they're prized, and it's not among other whites.