Mark Warner: Trump Aides’ Contacts With Russians Could Be ‘Coincidences,’ Not Collusion

Sounds to me like Sen. Warner is trying to wash his hands of the Russian collusion debacle now that the nattative has fallen apart. Sen. Warner suggests that perhaps the "Russian contacts" were just "coincidence" or Trumps staff had been "duped". As congress intensifies it's scrutiny of the FBI's counter intelligence investigation, disturbing questions about the FBI's methods, and sources arise. The FBI embedded a mole in the Trump campaign. Did the FBI mole encourage, or facilitate "Russian contacts", and under who's direction? The orchestration of the "Trump tower meeting" is painfully obvious, as Natalia and Glenn were careless. Orchestration in the case of Papadopoulos seems certain too. "Coincidence" Mr Warner? I think not. "Duped" is more apropos. The con wasn't limited to Trumps campaign staff either. Half of the country has been "duped", and not by "coincidence" Mr Warner. Comey "duped" media too. http://dailycaller.com/2018/05/13/mark-warner-trump-russia-collusion/

 

Witch hunting escapade!

 

Here's the elephant in the room. All the Russian contacts were allegedly an effort to recover Hillarys deleted emails ... emails deleted after they'd been SUBPOENAED. Why wouldn't the DOJ / FBI encourage and facilitate the recovery of the EVIDENCE that had been destroyed? Why would they prosecute persons who tried?

 

Lol emails that Russia never produced and instead hacked the dnc? Ok

 

Oh...you've been allowed to examine the server? Who knew?

 

SNIP
“I’m reserving my final judgement until we’ve seen all the witnesses we need to see, and we’ve gotten all the facts. So I’m going to hold off,”
ENDSNIP

I suggest you do the same.

Senator Warner and his Senate committee are working in a bi-partisan way. That committee's report will be a worthwhile summary, but it still doesn't have the resources that Mueller does... However, whatever Senator Warner says at the end of the day will be very important to me on how I view what happened in 2016.

Also, invalid thread title

 

Irrelevant. Hillarys emails were what was used to lure in Papadopoulos. I highly doubt Russia even possesses the emails, but it doesn't explain why FBI investigators went after him for trying to retrieve them, instead of helping him retrieve them. Now if this were all a ruse, and Papadopoulos was being led on ... why, and by whom? The whole affair was orchestrated to give the appearance of impropriety. The Trump tower meeting followed the same script ... dangle dirt on Clinton in order to create what appears to be a compromising situation. 2 meetings in where Putin operatives failed to deliver the goods promised on Clinton? Is that how quid pro quo works? Both seem like failed attempts at entrapment.

 

I need to server to know that Russia never released Hillary’s state emails?

 

Possibly because they never had them but we will never know since Hillary's server was never forensically examined. She wiped it with a cloth or something.

 

1. Russia never said they had her state dept emails
2. Russia did deliver the goods, via Wikileaks. Did you forget?

 

Even though that was denied and not proven why do you spout it like it is a fact?

 

What is it about leftists who want to control speech, debate and opinions? Only recently, while this entire Witch Hunt is becoming exposed, do leftists want to 'withhold judgement'.

That is terrific farce! Do you really feel that powerful leaders of the Democrats, the DOJ or the FBI were acting in a 'bipartisan way'??

It's perfectly valid.

 

That Russia was behind the hack? Geez are there still people doubting that? Lol

 

Without proof, you have no leg to stand on.

 

Do you actually read what you type before you hit Post Reply?

I don't really care what leftists want to do or not do... I want Senator Warner and his bi-partisan Senate committee to finish their investigation before any judgments are made by anybody on their committee... isn't that the American way (or used to be)??

Are you aware that Warner's committee is bi-partisan?

Do you know what bi-partisan means? (It doesn't mean you like both men and women, if that helps)

 

Ok, you’re starting to sound like folks who still doubt the moon landing lol

 

All you have is belief, no proof. I guess you don need no stinkin proof.

 

My position is the same as trumps Intel heads. Pompeo, Rogers, Coats....

 

That Russia tried to influence the election? They always do just like we do.

Other than that, you have no proof but only belief that Russia hacked anything.

 

That they were behind the dnc hack

 

No proof. No server was ever forensically examined by government.

 

Yet the people who have access to the Intel say that’s what happened with no equivocation

 

And no forensic investigation. FAIL.

 

So when’s trump firing these liars? Oops he just promoted Pompeo lol
Why are his Intel heads starting **** with Russia with no proof?

 

Puhleeze. Mark Warner is a partisan hack.

I can't imagine why...



After that performance I stopped listening to what Mark Warner has to say...