Death tax

Discussion in 'Budget & Taxes' started by trickyricky, Nov 6, 2017.

  1. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,396
    Likes Received:
    3,010
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, you have merely made that claim without supporting it. As is your wont.
    More accurately, you are no fan of honesty, reason, fact, honesty, discourse, or honesty.
    What on earth do you even incorrectly imagine you think you might be bloviating about?
     
  2. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    More grunt dodge. Let's try again: Do you think referring to "Marxist/neoclassical aggregations" makes sense when referring to a school of thought which essentially refers to unique characteristics of firms to explain why economies of scale is of less import?
     
  3. Capt Nice

    Capt Nice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2017
    Messages:
    9,998
    Likes Received:
    10,217
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It's probably considered 'income' for the people who financially benefit from your death.
     
  4. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,396
    Likes Received:
    3,010
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, as something it completely misses. Which was kinda the point. Which you have decided never to understand.
     
  5. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You do so struggle! Let's try again. Where is the "Marxist/neoclassical aggregation" with a theory of a firm that focuses on how firms grow so differently?
     
  6. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,396
    Likes Received:
    3,010
    Trophy Points:
    113
    With you, it's more of a sickness.
    What does that theory call the firm's "capital"?
     
  7. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ooo, are you going to derive a microeconomic critique on a microeconomic school of thought? Go ahead!
     
  8. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,396
    Likes Received:
    3,010
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I already did: it accepts the invalid aggregations of neoclassical economics, as neoclassical economics did less ingenuously the invalid aggregations of Marxism.
     
  9. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Tut tut! Your reading skills have failed you: Derive a microeconomic critique of a microeconomic school of thought.

    Try again with your blag...
     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2018
  10. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,396
    Likes Received:
    3,010
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not interested in whatever homework assignment you mistakenly believe is relevant to what I posted.
     
  11. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I know you can't derive a microeconomic critique of a microeconomic school of thought. That's the point after all. You've been found out (again)
     
  12. liberalminority

    liberalminority Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Messages:
    25,273
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    Trophy Points:
    113
    focusing on inheritance from the rich is disingenuous, the self made rich also earn riches inequitably but drive up inequality much faster.

    inheritance is for average people without talent or education, who can pass on some of the fruits of their labors from an honest days work to future generations.

    the rich will always rule, it depends on which side is merciful to most people.
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2018
  13. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,396
    Likes Received:
    3,010
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, I already gave you one, so it is you whose incompetence has been found out again.
     
  14. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You haven't referred to any microeconomics. I'm happy for you to pretend otherwise. Can you please refer to this microeconomics and demonstrate the significance of your comment?
     
  15. 61falcon

    61falcon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    21,436
    Likes Received:
    12,227
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If you give someone over $14,000 while you are alive the amount you give over $14,000 is taxed as earned income to the recipient.If you cannot give it to someone tax free while you are alive why should you not be taxed on it when you re dead where the exemption was well over $5 Million.This is just another method of the rich taking care of the rich.
     
  16. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,396
    Likes Received:
    3,010
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course that is another bald falsehood from you.
    See posts #304 and #306 in this thread. Not that such facts will alter your behavior in any way.
     
  17. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    #304: "Yes, as something it completely misses. Which was kinda the point. Which you have decided never to understand."
    #306: "With you, it's more of a sickness...What does that theory call the firm's "capital"?"

    Wow!
     
  18. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,396
    Likes Received:
    3,010
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Can you make relevant microeconomic comment by answering the question? Can you even remember what I said it misses?
     
  19. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Where was the microeconomic comment in #304 and #306? They were clearly drivel comments.
     
  20. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,396
    Likes Received:
    3,010
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong.

    Can you answer the question?
     
  21. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Come now. Tell me where there is microeconomic comment in the clearly rant comments that you, for some unknown reason, decided to refer to?
     
  22. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,396
    Likes Received:
    3,010
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In the question. Which you cannot answer.
     
  23. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You do make me laugh. You refer to quotes that clearly were rant and then tell me that proves otherwise.
     
  24. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,396
    Likes Received:
    3,010
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course it is easy to dismiss anything you can't answer as "rant."
     
  25. Capt Nice

    Capt Nice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2017
    Messages:
    9,998
    Likes Received:
    10,217
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes you earned it but I'm guessing the forefathers involved decided that the recipients of your wealth didn't earn it and therefore decided to tax this 'new found' wealth. I don't know this to be true but I'm just making a guess.
     

Share This Page