Why I dislike the AGW cult

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by Josephwalker, Jun 25, 2018.

  1. Beer w/Straw

    Beer w/Straw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2017
    Messages:
    899
    Likes Received:
    339
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Female
    What bible verse was that?
     
  2. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    30,990
    Likes Received:
    28,459
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hmmm... let me see..... Eugenics, book 1 chapter 3, verse 2...
     
  3. Beer w/Straw

    Beer w/Straw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2017
    Messages:
    899
    Likes Received:
    339
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Female
    Yes, I remember!

    Multivariable calculus was not introduced until the New Testament!
     
    dagosa likes this.
  4. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    IF PROVED ! Be careful, you’re beginning to accept everything we’ve been saying about AGW. It’s been THROUGH THE RINGER.
    Institutions are backed by the work of thousands. That’s why opinions that have not been substantiated by the the scientific method, are useless. So, you come down with cancer. Are you going to listen to and act on one doctor’s opinion that appears in NO ACCREDITED medical facility as an accepted treatment, or are going to Mass General, or Johns Hopkins that have years of trials and tested treatments with proven results that agree with every other treatment facility ? Be careful how you answer this. You’re promoting “ opinion” care and not proven treatments. Anything less, and you’re a hypocrite.
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2018
  5. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ha ha...
    Funny one.
     
  6. Josephwalker

    Josephwalker Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2016
    Messages:
    19,954
    Likes Received:
    10,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Cancer is not a politicized issue, AGW is. Scientist are like anybody else in this regard and can and do put politics ahead of science especially in academic circles which are bastions of the left. Add that to the fact that anyone in those circles will be immediately shunned if they don't get on board and you quickly see this so called concensus is meaningless. Same thing with corporations that take a stance. If they come out as non believers they risk boycott by the cult so it's just good business to say yeah us too.
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2018
  7. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You’re saying
    Cancer is NOT politicized ? . Then why do you and the GOP support eliminating Obamacare, which is a political issue, which forces companies to insure patients with Pre existing conditions, like cancer. You’ve just made cancer a political issue.



    So, the smartest and vast majority of people in science, in the world are not to be trusted for political reasons ......and you now listen to those who can’t even get their work verified and published at any institute of higher learning in the world. So, now you’re promoting Faux News as the authority on AGW

    Yes, the academic world is a bastion of the left, and for good reason. You conservative types in general by you’re own admission, DONT BELEVE IN SCIENCE AND THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
    You believe in the GOP which has authored 9 of the last 10 recessions, raised the debt at a faster rate then anyone else, and believes in the tooth fairy.
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2018
  8. Josephwalker

    Josephwalker Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2016
    Messages:
    19,954
    Likes Received:
    10,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You just proved my point that if you don't get on the band wagon you are demonized, belittled and ostracized. Thank you for your cooperation.
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2018
  9. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It’s an irrevant point because it still didn’t change the final opinion of this publication on AGW. This is the operating strategy of deniers; find an obscure disagreement and pretend it disproves AGW, even when the final agreement still doesn’t change. You did what you usually do, provide fake news.
     
  10. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, in reality, people who just make up crapolla and pretend they are smarter then the smartest people in the field on the entire planet.....are often ostracized, belittled and demonized...regularly. As long as you keep thinking you’re smarter then anyone else in a field you know so little about, it just happens. Get use to it.
     
  11. Josephwalker

    Josephwalker Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2016
    Messages:
    19,954
    Likes Received:
    10,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Josephwalker said

    You cultist are so emotional. I merely responded to claims that the ocean doesn't suck up C02. Take deep breaths. Oh wait! Don't do that you'll exhale C02!!!!!!


    "It’s an irrevant point because it still didn’t change the final opinion of this publication on AGW. This is the operating strategy of deniers; find an obscure disagreement and pretend it disproves AGW, even when the final agreement still doesn’t change. You did what you usually do, provide fake news."

    non se·qui·tur
    ˌnän ˈsekwədər/
    noun
    1. a conclusion or statement that does not logically follow from the previous argument or statement.
     
  12. Josephwalker

    Josephwalker Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2016
    Messages:
    19,954
    Likes Received:
    10,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Once again you prove my point and once again thank you.
     
  13. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,398
    Likes Received:
    3,010
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong.
    The FDA is there to REGULATE, not to DISCOVER.
    I'm not interested in what is APPROVED, only what is TRUE. That is very much the point.
    I couldn't care less what is ACCEPTED, or APPROVED, or ACCREDITED, or CERTIFIED, etc.
    Garbage. When Jenner discovered vaccination, there was no institutional approach; the institutions all fought him tooth and nail, which is why it took DECADES to get vaccination accepted in practice, and the institutions thereby killed millions of people.
    False.
    Irrelevant. See above.
    That is self-evidently false and absurd. What on earth do you imagine they test and try if not a discovery. Give your head a shake.
    As they say in Japan, "It's mirror time!"
    If conspiracy kooks did not exist, conspirators would have to invent them.

    Oh, wait a minute....
     
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2018
  14. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ha ha
    I guess you don’t know what “FDA approved” means.
    https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/272986.php
    Enlighten yourself.
     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2018
  15. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So, what makes you smarter then every Govt. Agency in the free world, every university and all 81 of the major corporations ? They have all signed on to AGW. What qualifications do YOU have and how many years have you spent reaserching it.....while you just quote fellow deniers. Answer the question. In your terms, why do you think you know more then the Pope ? He has direct line to God. What are your qualifications ?
    I don’t tout any qualifications of my own. I just support the opinion of The 97% of those within institutions that do have the qualifications.
     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2018
  16. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Truth telling does seem like demonization to the uninformed.
    It’s factual, your side has a 90% “success rate” in starting recessions. They have a 100% success rate in increasing the the yearly deficit. They used to agree with AGW and proposed a carbon tax to change it. They changed their mind after citizens united allowed them to accept millions in political donations from corporations that didn’t want to be taxed. They did this even though, companies like Exxon, still believed AGW was occurring. They were doing their own research to prepare for a shift in product development.
     
  17. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Now, who are the “snowflakes.” ?
     
  18. Josephwalker

    Josephwalker Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2016
    Messages:
    19,954
    Likes Received:
    10,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have answered this question already you just don't like the answer
     
  19. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You never have..you just claim you have. That’s pretty much how all your posts are.
     
  20. Josephwalker

    Josephwalker Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2016
    Messages:
    19,954
    Likes Received:
    10,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Apparently my answer went right over your head
     
  21. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gee, AGW went over your head. You have a much bigger problem living in a fact based universe.
     
  22. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,398
    Likes Received:
    3,010
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure I do: it means the FDA is a regulator, not a discoverer. Discoverers don't issue or deny approvals.

    That was easy.
    Haha, I am still more enlightened than you; I'm right, and you're wrong. Thanks for posting the proof.
     
  23. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What you just don’t get is, any Charlatan can claim to discover something. If you denier conspiracy theorist had your way, Suzanne Somers would be hailed as Jonas Salk. You don’t understand “ Trials” and you’d like the FDA to do what, step aside so chicken soup could be declared as a wonder cure so white America wouldn’t have to fund Medicaid for the poor ?
    More Enlightened ? Hardly. Any charlatan can claim that too.
     
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2018
  24. Josephwalker

    Josephwalker Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2016
    Messages:
    19,954
    Likes Received:
    10,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yet another reason Why I dislike the AGW cult. No different than any other cult though really. Non believers are just not enlightened and can't see the "truth".
     
  25. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Cult ?
    You don’t even know what a cult is.
    It’s not a cult when every Govt, every university and every scientific organization in the world believes in tI ? It’s a cult, when you don’t.
     
    Last edited: Aug 6, 2018

Share This Page