Mohammad gets free speech shut down

Charlie hebdo crew experimented the tolerance of muslims.

 

Only if his 6 year old wife is in the picture.

 

So then drawing a cartoon of Mohammad having sex with 9 year-old (child) Aisha would REALLY be banned then.
https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Aishas_Age_of_Consummation

 

Can you condemn Mohammad for saying that people can't draw him?

 

We cross-posted - you beat me to it(!) - good work!

 

Muhammed has too many real things he can, and should be, condemned for.

 

So true. I swear that I once posted a huge list of bad things about the Islamic texts, and this forum's software wouldn't accept that posting until I pared it down a bit! Literally too many bad things to list!

 

So then why did this idiot say this, at the UN no less?

 

So, you’re afraid of someone on your front porch with a Bible?

 

Too many rich Muslim countries in the UN.

And not enough westerners know anything about the religion,
and you can say anything and they will accept it.

 

Radical Christians are annoying
Radical Muslims kill people.

 

There is no right to not be annoyed. There is a right to life.

 

Yes, that's why I (and most other Modern Secular Humanists) believe in freedom of religion, as such.

 

They believe in a man (Jesus) who hates so much that he is part of a system that will send even ethical, decent, hard-working, say, Buddhists, to a barbaric worse-than-Auschwitz "lake of fire". So they believe in a man that is worse than even Hitler. Hitler, effectively, didn't torture people forever - but God/Jesus set up a system whereby those same Jews from Auschwitz will be more brutally, more savagely, be TORTURED than even Hitler ever dreamed about.

 

He probably said it because it was lifted from an entire speech. Taken out of context (you do know what context is I presume) it looks like bloody red meat for the Trumpies. It's just another fabricated lie for folks too damn stupid to read a full text or say anything not fed to them by the RW "media." Go dig up the full speech on the Internet if you want the truth. If you don't want the truth then crawl back and join the like minded. Man, I get sick of the lying.

 

Yes, so we need to DEFEND free speech, even it's a cartoon that some people don't like.

 

Nonsense - he meant it just like he said it.
If not, then tell us the context that it WAS in, my friend. Can you do that?

 

Show us ONE time that Obama condemned the barbarity of Mohammad and/or the barbarity of the Islamic texts. We'll wait.

 

Absolutely. It was in poor taste to draw the cartoons, but it’s free speech.

 

And MODERATE Muslims give their impressionable young children the same exact Islamic texts that said "Radical Muslims"** use to justify their Jihad, and don't condemn said texts!

**AKA "the more pious, more religious, more true Muslims, who take the texts more seriously".

 

It was in poor taste for Muhammed's boys to tie a woman's legs between two camels and split her in half, also.

 

Mohammad is a warmongering, peace through sword and submission, misogynistic pedophile. It would be easier to make a list of what is worth praising about him.

 

Agreed.
However, I'm not sure I'd actually call it "in poor taste" when it is intended to teach a blind world about the biggest threat to our freedom since communism (Islamism.)

 

When Muhammed told his men to drink camel piss, That was in poor taste, no pun intended.

 

Great point.
The problem is that today, even Moderate Muslims can't condemn Mohammad for approving of that - they also have a hard time condemning the "associates of Mohammad who Mohammad loved back in the day" for committing even the most barbaric crime against humanity.