TRUMP CRIES FRAUD AS A DEMOCRAT PULLS AHEAD IN ARIZONA

still didn't fully explain the procedure. are they just accepting phone calls with a "yeah, that was me" or are they scrutinizing identity and then asking? huge difference...

 

Do you only like certain locations on mamasaids Avatar?? It is a single unit spaceship..12 Billion Max Occupancy.. barring any major celestial or cereberal impacts it could fly longtime in circles

a third of the passengers get to fly for less than a dollar day.. who knew space travel could be so affordable??

 

not the point, we need to know exactly how they plan on verifying the sigs, a simple phone call is not sufficient as they have no proof as to whom answers the phone, so are they requiring the voters to come in person to verify the signatures, if not then it's illegal and shouldn't count...

 

A moot point.

Sinema won. It's over.

AZ can run elections any way that they want.

If you have a problem with it, move to AZ and file a lawsuit.

 

everyone should be concerned as to how the verification process works, it's not a partisan issue, it's a voter system issue.

i have no problem with it, if the results change for one side or the other, however it appears as though you'd be happy only if it went in the dems favor regardless of how, that is what is wrong with society today...

 

I could be wrong, but I think it is similar to what you need for a provisional ballot.
Drivers license #.
SS Number.
Address.

 

Why are you so dreadfully uninformed about what your own party is doing? Perusing the wrong "news" again?

 

The only only long term cure is to stop encouraging Democrats until they show evidence of change.

 

I feel like everyone thinks it sucks so why can’t anything be done?

 

Signatures can vary largely from document to document. Without knowing who is verifying these signatures, if they are only looking at one example, it is a quite poor comparison. My signature using ink probably varies between about 5 to 6 different styles. Handwriting analysis and professionals that verify signatures always ask for multiple examples of signatures. There are many factors that change how your signature looks and the experts need multiple examples to see how this varies. Is it surprising that a signature does not match? No, but that does not mean that the same person did not sign it. The most common mistake in analysis is ignoring the variance. You cannot know the variance by looking at one signature.

 

For the economy to be left to any president, it assumes the president is totally in charge of the economy. Economics does not work that way. It is time for Democrats to learn how things work and stop saying their opinion are truth.

Bush at no time was in charge of the economy. Obama never had it either. He did have a 1.4 trillion dollar deficit though that democrats deny he had.

Presidents have but one way to impact the economy. This is tax policy. Trump has improved this area and the results are the economy has made gains. But it does not put him in charge of the economy. Other things done by the president including foreign trade issues, can be impacted by his actions. But those can also be independent of the economy of the USA.

 

Well, it is up to the voter to do his or her best to be uniform so the election bodies can grasp the validity or not.

I sign in a way that still looks like it did when I was 40 years younger. I think I can match my today signature back to my 20s in fact. Does it vary? Definitely so. But there are tip offs in my signature that help them know who it is.

 

So you are saying that your signatures don't match, but they are close. All that Trump claimed was that the signatures don't match. He did not say that they were totally different.

 

I think we are just pissing in the wind on these signatures.... the only way we are going to know what's going on is to see random examples of signatures that failed the test and see how "fine tuned" this process is.... But I honestly had NO IDEA that signature matching was a duty of some (all?) election officials in this country. That's probably one of the scariest things I've heard this election season (other than Virginia whackadoo Corey Stewart getting 1.3 million votes in my state)

I've never voted any way other than live on election day with no signature required. And certainly don't plan to, knowing the signature police might have to get involved...

 

Just what we need ... another politician looking after the takers and not the makers.

 

Would you accept a check or credit card charge with a signature that didn't match?

 

Do you have that temps name and a link for their resume? I think you are reaching reeeeallll far. As a matter of fact I think you are making **** up. Just sayin.

 

i have voted by mail since around the time of Bill Clinton. And on the back of the ballot envelope, my signature is a required item.

 

I would declare that anybody can see my signature when I was then 20 and look today and notice it still appears about the same. Differences are not considerable.

 

Arizona will be called for Democrats. Hell, even McCain’s widow voted Democrat and wants her vote counting. Repubs have lost their minds and AZ is becoming a blue state - just like TX

 

You are again using qualifiers and not using the same language that Trump used. Trump claimed the signatures do not match. Semantics are quite important here. The words chosen for judging something affect how people respond. Saying a signature matches is a stronger claim than saying a signature is about the same. Would everyone declare your signatures match?

 

Wait.... you are using the words Semantics and Trump in the same post?? Yuuuge mistake....

 

Haha, look at babyman Trump's tweets....he clearly hasn't read a single sentence of any of the news reports. What an embarrassing moron.

 

Yeah, I know. It is silly to expect any sort of honesty or precision from our president. Trump's words do not matter. He will tell us what he meant which could change depending on the time of day.

 

You have ZERO clue how Cindy McCain voted, but serves you right if she did vote for Sinema... Just because she wants all the votes counted doesn't remotely tell you how she voted.....

Classic!