TV Networks’ Coverage of Trump Was 90% Negative in 2018, Study Shows

fyi, 98 senators voted for sanctions against russia because of their actions.

again, time to put on the big boy pants and stop whining.

 

And Trump issued sanctions by executive Order.

 

oh really, trump did all that

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/01/15/po...ns-trump/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/

 

TV Networks’ Coverage of Trump Was 90% Negative in 2018, Study Shows

It good backfire. Americans have a soft spot for underdogs.

 

The MSM bias against trump is self evident. And if your brain cannot discern this, get it to a repair center, fast.

I listen to public broadcasting here in Ms. Seldom will you see journalistic standards incorporated in their reporting. Instead you always have anti trump so called experts doing the commenting. No "other side" present. So, no standards equals propaganda. This is prolific folks and as self evident as anything can be.

Americans do not get genuine journalism, period. They do not get both sides of the story, or all sides given by serious astute intellects. We are victims of propaganda, and the only one who care are the ones who do not agree with the biased propaganda. The Left sees it as genuine news! And of course they don't care. A helluva thing folks, a helluva thing. So many dysfunctional minds in america these days. I hope it only infects and affects the trump haters. If not, we...are...done.

 

Take off the blinders. The last election showed that most Americans now see Trump for what he is; "a liar, a cheat, and a con man."
They also elected the guy with that quote to the Senate.

 

Then you need to tell people like Greenwald to remove his. ha ha

You lose sir. Because you either don't understand journalistic standards and its absence in MSM and even with PBS, or you simply do not give a rat's arse. I opt for the latter, as that is self evident to those with even a few living brain cells.

Either you are hopeless, or you are doing this crap intentionally, being deceptive. Either way you are lost.

Journalistic standards are easy to understand. When there is a lack of this, and there is, for you cannot give any evidence that they exist, you lose. That is the way rational minds operate. But can you see it? Not a chance in hell. ha ha You just remove yourself from serious discussion is all. And I don't care.

 

What do you want them to do? Ignore his lies?
Ain't gonna happen.
I can post you a link to some of his best ones for 2018, but of course the media published them.

 

Yep.

https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Documents/ukraine.txt

 

Of course not, but its more than just his lies. And always has been. They exhibit zero in standards, as voiced out by journalists like Greenwald. You don't read him, huh? I found that leftists have no place in their minds for real journalism. It might make them use their brains for something other than parroting shoddy journalism. Sorry for the jaded opinion of your team. I had to leave it because of things like this.

Democrats lie through their teeth all of the time. But that doesn't get your attention nor that of MSM. It is absurd.

MSM did not attack obama for his lies, did they? ha ha It is one sided. And that is wrong in an honest man's book.

 

Its hilarious that there still some who claim there is no media bias and yet just can't seem to find evidence to back their claim.

 

fyi, your doc is dated oct 2016

my article was from this week

 

The fact you find it hard to believe, means you've been living under a rock or don't watch/read the MSM.

 

yeah right, 2 late night comedians made millions pointing out fox news lies and misleading statements.

 

Just shows you how terrible Trump is as President .............. What's the problem?

 

Confirmation bias, also called confirmatory bias or myside bias,[Note 1] is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses.[1] It is a type of cognitive bias and a systematic error of inductive reasoning. People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a biased way. The effect is stronger for emotionally charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs. Confirmation bias is a variation of the more general tendency of apophenia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

 

I think he's using George Soros, "Media Matters" as a source.

 

Perfect description of Trump's Sycophants and the Fox/Breitbart/Etc. RW Fever Swamp.

Is there any more tired, warmed-over, Wiki Copypasta that you would like to share?

Oh, and back on topic, how did they actually find 10% "positive" stuff to report about that OBESE IMBECILE?

 

I never gave FOX a free pass. But MSM has more outlets in the traditional media. And they seem to walk in lockstep. It isn't genuine journalism, but then neither is most of FOX either. The problem involves all of the legacy media.

 

That is pretty much on par with his presidency.

 

What did we have when he took office and what did we have when he left?

 

We had a dem congress...and when he left a GOP one...all the difference in the world

 

Your article while true about congress is mostly false about Trump.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-sanctions-russias-intelligence-agency-present-putin/

 

No doubt.

Under Obama, the left denied media bias.

Now under Trump, they just say "good".

Lefties are gonna lefty.

 

You think NONE of the 90% negative media coverage is due to bias!?