Blood-thirsty Democrats CHEER as NY Senate passes horrifying new bill legalizing infanticide

I don't think you do see. Citing a fringe group, that is much more likely to get an abortion, and then using that as a justification across the board.

Specious, and irrelevant logic.

 

I gave you numbers for women of child bearing age from under 15 to over. A range of 27% to 5%. ALL groups reported a percentage that had no or only late term pre-natal care. You claimed that did not exist. You are trying to claim "all women of child bering age" are a "fringe group". WTF, dude.

And NONE of the women in the study - under 15 or over, had an abortion. They were all mothers.

 

I think its a very reasonable law. especially given the health concerns. as for the economic concerns, each child that is handed over to the state to raise ends up costing the taxpayers more money in increased taxes. Most people don't want to pay to raise someone else's child.

 

I asked you a very simple question-what percentage of 15 year olds carry to term?

 

There are two parts to this abortion story that are troublesome. Anyone who would pass a law like this and then receive an ovation is probably not someone who belongs in a civilized society - and I'm pro choice (although not for the reasons you think). Second, anyone who would actually perform an abortion a few hours before birth....well, what can I say? Who would among us would be able to do something like that?

 

Can you show where any doctors are preforming abortions - legal or not - a "few hours before birth".

 

Are you seriously quoting the man who would have no qualms killing innocent children if it fits his agenda?

 

LOL....you assume that they would pick every single one they see??

 

Over the top hysterics with little substance. And LOL at "death squads." You are Sarah Palin's understudy for something?

 

He saved innocent children even pioneering several surgical techniques.

 

Where does it say that isn't an option?

 

Is there any of the RW, especially on PF, that doesn't lie? I have not seen 1 yet.

 

Find out.

 

Wow, did you post this sober? For the sake of Alt RW, hope not.

 

And the horse you road in on.

 

Do you deny it. We had people in this forum classify the MAGA hat as an offense. There were liberal legislator cheers as the murder bill was passed.

 

We seem to have the same experience here....lol
However I have lots of republicans in my family and some of them have been very honorable in their political belief system and acknowledge the the ****ed up way the party has acted in the past 10 years and some have become something that I can't recognize, and have lost all respect for.
Thanks Obama......Trump I meant .......lol

 

What was moronic was liberals during the Kavanaugh hearing acting like drinking beer in high school was some terrible act. You moralize about high school students drinking bear and yet want high schools students to have abortions without the parents knowledge. What do you call that logic?

 

Who? Evil people.

 

There might be a few who posted that. But that doesn't mean, as you imply, that a liberal supports a MAGA hat is a crime.
Maybe it was just a bad way you worded the post and didn't mean to imply every liberal supports it.

And for the NY law, it is to save the mother's life, when the choice is mother or unborn fetus.

I posted the law in this thread and the other thread on this topic, with a link.
Check it out

 

Well maybe only some liberals view MAGA hats as a crime. I hope only some. Then others (such as those who post here) compare a MAGA hat to a KKK hat. For some reason the ANTIFA outfit which is KKK-like is not commented on.

Note that the choice to "save the mothers life" (kill the baby) does not have to be made by a physician per the NY murder law.

 

I've been here 8 yrs. It is most always the same.
But the site is 70% or so RW. And most of them are retired, ie old. They have a different mind set, as does everyone who is 2 generations removed from the next generation to run the world.
Yes, in the real world, not anonymous as this forum is, both R and D are mostly civil in discussions.
But there has always been a rule of thumb when with good friends and relatives, don't talk religion or politics if you don't want a fight.

Exactly, the 2 party system has gone to the fringes. And they are smart and know how to keep the sheeple pointing fingers.
But when push comes to shove and they can vote themselves greater power at the expense of liberty to us sheeple, they are in lock step.

 

There's a different level of ethics and morals between one wanting to apply for welfare and one who wants to sit on the highest court in the land.
But yes, he was run through the ringer.

 

A doctor has to perform it, yes?
And who determines if the mother's life is in danger?

 

My understanding is a midwife can make the "life in danger" determination an perform the abortion.