Blood-thirsty Democrats CHEER as NY Senate passes horrifying new bill legalizing infanticide

Tell that to the judge

I NEVER said the fetus is not alive....WTF did you get that?

CAN YOU SHOW EXACTLY WHERE I SAID THE FETUS IS NOT ALIVE?

NO YOU CAN'T...so you know what that makes you

,


I never said that either.

WHY do ANTI-CHOICERS ALWAYS have to make things up?

Don't they ever have facts???

There could be....shrug

 

It's repulsive to:1) deliver a healthy baby, 2) keep it "comfortable" while the doctor and mother meet for a few hours to decide it's fate, and 3) go back to the baby and complete the "abortion".

Chilling.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
So the "father" should have a say?

OK, WHAT IF HE SAYS ABORT ??????????

The question no Anti-choicer seems to be able to answer.

OK, WHAT IF HE SAYS ABORT ??????????

The question no Anti-choicer seems to be able to answer.

So you think his "contribution" BOUGHT the woman?

No, that hasn't worked since caveman days...and most of us have gone past that...

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
I just answered it:

A "father" has no say in what a woman does with her own body. It isn't his body.

A "father" by law, has to support his children.

See, once they are CHILDREN and NOT FETUSES, they are not part of the woman's body (see what happens at BIRTH, look it up).


Science may be frightening to some but they still rule on what is a fetus and what is a child...there is NO child until birth.


There is a difference between "born" and "unborn" that's why they have two different words for them

Couldn't address my post so had to use a desperation move of Topic Changing...so funny!!!…...

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
So the "father" should have a say?

OK, WHAT IF HE SAYS ABORT ??????????

YOU wanted him to have a "say" but what you really want is for the man to FORCE the woman (LIKE RAPISTS USE FORCE ON WOMEN) to gestate....

UH DUHHHHHHHHHHH it is against the law for a woman to have an abortion in the third trimester and the "man" who impregnated her has NOTHING to do with it...

 

What isn't equal ? GOODGAWDDUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH...…. only ONE has to be pregnant and give birth !

 

But you were hinting you didn't mind helping mother or father who might not be able to afford kid. By ignoring my questions.
Then you come out and state they should be responsible for their actions. Even if they can't afford the kid.

So if they have the kid, and can't afford to raise it alone, why would you not want to help?
So you are at RWer who is PRO Choice? Yes. Good.

 

How'd you come to those conclusions?
Can you point to the legislation?

 

This is also repulsive.

 

What did he say... oh, not much...

Virginia Governor Democrat and suspected KKK sympathizer Ralph Northam said that when a baby, about to be born, is suspected of being born in less than perfect order, the baby would be delivered, made comfortable and then the discussion between the mother and the doctor(s) whether the baby should live or be murdered will ensue.

 

The implied purpose of making them babies comfortable is to express motherly love... just before mother engage in a lively discussion whether to kill her newborn baby or not.

 

It's her body until the baby is viable outside her body. Then it's also the father's baby.

 

The day a father dies during labor is the day they should have any kind of equal say in the matter.

 

That was sarcasm. I was mocking the left’s attitude regarding poor children: life isn’t worth living if a child is poor, so it’s better to abort them and spare them the indignity if living below the poverty line.

 

The day the mother is going to fertilize without male sperm... is going to be a brave new world

 

This new law makes it even easier to have a third trimester abortion than it previously was and now it doesn't even have to be a doctor who does it.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
So the "father" should have a say?

OK, WHAT IF HE SAYS ABORT ??????????





YOU wanted him to have a "say" but what you really want is for the man to FORCE the woman (LIKE RAPISTS USE FORCE ON WOMEN) to gestate....

UH DUHHHHHHHHHHH it is against the law for a woman to have an abortion in the third trimester and the "man" who impregnated her has NOTHING to do with it...

GOOD!


OK, NOW do you want to address the post of mine you quoted????

 

You re being absurd. No doctor would ever do such a thing. Look at severe Spina bifida... That's the sort of cruel birth defect at the heart of the matter.

 

Already did

 

After born it needs a team of doctors.. Cant wait to hear about "mainsplaining" or "sexism" since the majority of MD's are male or screams of the "patriarchy" if its a team of woman doctors. Even then "Womens health" trumps all in there minds and "health" can be defined as anything..

A Woman worried how she is going to raise a child can be very stressful ( which is normal for anyone raising kids)..

Stress has a negative impact on health therefor simply being stressed AFTER having a baby could work under Northam's err logic.

 

One "doctor" is rotting in jail over it as we speak.

 

Bottom line -

All humans are different. All women are different. We all handle stress differently. Many women can handle the stress of pregnancy and the resulting complications. Some cannot.
Some don’t realize this until they are faced with the actual bodily changes that start occurring. The fear for some is over-whelming.

We don’t live in a perfect world where every uterus is perfect, where every egg attaches perfectly. Women sometimes contract Zika, measles, and other illnesses while pregnant. Women sometimes develop gestational diabetes while pregnant.

Women with sometime debilitating mental disease and impaired judgement become pregnant.

Young women are raped every day.

Are we really going to try and say that one set of rules is going to handle every situation that arises? That women aren’t individuals with varying needs? That while pregnant a woman hands over all her decisions to the State? If men could get pregnant, this would never be allowed.

 

A loophole you can drive a Mac truck through.

 

We have one set of rules for murder as we should for infanticide