Adam Schiff rejects reports that Mueller indictments are over, says special counsel could be called

So now Mueller colluded with Trump?

 

YOU said Schiff wanted more ... Schiff doesn't know what topics Mueller did or did not address thus he cannot ask Mueller to EXPAND on what Schiff hasn't seen. Schiff wants to go fishin' ... without a license.

 

Trump University is not whataboutism. He was found to have cheated American citizens out of tens of millions and forced to pay them back. Pretty scummy in my opinion.

 

Democrats cannot accept the results of an election and now they cannot accept the results of a Special Counsel investigation....

Geez, these whiney babies need to be thrown out of office.

 

Well Kode just admitted to taking commentary as news. It's no stretch that he would take MSNBC and Democratic Underground as real news too.

 

If you ever find a complete saint in this world then post it here so we can see who it is. So who would you nominate first?

 

The DOJ has rules against disparaging, slandering, or making insinuations about a party of an investigation that has not been charged. If Mr Mueller were to do so in a report then the AG would easily be able to strike those parts from anything that were made public. Technically this also applies to any public statements and testimony that Mr Mueller would deliver however it is just a rule, not a law, and as such has no real consequence.

Enter Rep Schiff (or any other Dem for that matter). Testifying before a dais of anti-Trumpers could theoretically create a situation where Mr Mueller either knowingly or unknowingly creates the justification for Democrats to continue their baseless probes by saying such things in speculation that were never proven in fact. Now I doubt Mr Mueller with his experience would allow himself to be so obviously baited in this manner so should this scenario actually happen then we could confirm the suspicion that Mr Mueller was never working for justice but rather for the anti-Trump movement.

Either way the Democrats want Mr Mueller and his report so that they can either point to some portion and claim grounds for impeachment or reject it and claim grounds for a second (third, fourth, fifth..) effort.

 

Mueller simply took the place of Comey. Mueller was acting as a firewall but now has no additional excuses to offer up to Barr.

Mueller knows that perpetuating his actions would put his own tail end in potential harms way as well.

The DOJ is now going to be in a position to tear up a few of the unmaskers and leakers.

 

I would prefer an election with no swindlers if possible. Kascich vs Bernie would have been a nice debate on ideas.

 

That's kind my point. Nobody has seen it and yet there are vitriolic reactions from a lot on the left. I wonder how this progresses when the disappointment sets in after the release from Barr. No colusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign is what we know for a fact as of right now. The only thing left for the left to hang their hat on is obstruction. If that doesn't happen they could very well start crapping on Mueller like they did Horowitz with his report.

 

Actually you are wrong. Just wait until after the report is released that shows no collusion or obstruction.

MSNBC’s Chris Matthews livid over Mueller report: ‘How could they let Trump off the hook?’
MSNBC host Chris Matthews expressed outrage on Friday upon hearing reports that Special Counsel Robert Mueller had completed his Russia investigation and submitted it to the attorney general -- with further indictments not expected.
Matthews began his show by summarizing the breaking news, but stressed that Mueller handed his report to the Department of Justice “without ever directly interviewing the president of the United States.”
“That means no charges against the president, his children or his associates after all those meetings with the Russians,” a visibly upset Matthews told his viewers.

The liberal cable news host opened the discussion to the panel, telling them his “biggest question” was “How can the president be pointed to as leading collusion with Russia, aiding a Russian conspiracy to interfere with our elections if none of his henchmen, none of his children, none of his associates have been indicted?”


NBC News national security reporter Ken Dilanian responded by telling Matthews that Trump couldn’t be indicted “in a criminal sense” since Mueller’s office “didn’t have it,” adding that the president “couldn’t conspire with himself.”

“Maybe he missed the boat here,” Matthews responded. “Because we know about the Trump Tower meeting in June 2016, we know about the meeting at the cigar bar with Kilimnik. My God, we know about all of those meetings with Kislyak at the Republican convention in Cleveland. All these dots we’re now to believe don’t connect.”
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ms...-report-how-could-they-let-trump-off-the-hook

 

There is no collusion, you can tell that by his actions and his statements and actions by people like Nancy.

 

I remember they said they would accept the results of the the election. They also said they would accept the results of the investigation from the DOJ OIG. Before he even got done with his investigation they accused him of being corrupt in his recommendation to fire McCabe. Tigers don't change stripes.

 

Not what I meant, my post wasn’t clear. Sorry

 

Congress has oversight duties spelled out in the constitution

 

Sanders sold his communist soul for a third house. I liked Kascich, but disagree with him after he turned on his party. In another world he’d be called an Uncle Tom.

 

Trump has always been a racketeer and grifter and deserves to be nailed to the wall one way or another.

 

When was that ?

 

So wait, the Trump people tried to influence Russia. Holy cow, that's WHAT they're supposed to do. Wasn't the conspiracy the other way around? That Trump's people were the ones being influenced? Talk about grasping at straws.

 

I am not at all surprised with finding out that mueller found nothing of merit, equally i am not surprised to see the left reject the mueller report

 

Respect has nothing to do with it. He is still corrupt and abused power by destroying people over minor things that have been ignored when Democrats do the same thing. The way the Right treated Mueller is nothing compared to the way Starr was treated especially since the MSM attack dog was in Clinton defense mode.

 

Like Schiff wants, no amount of investigation will be enough for you, there will always be something else to investigate.

 

Oversight of the executive agencies not of what trump did in his private life or business life decades ago

 

Why are you disappointed that our president is not a traitor? Isn't it a good thing that there is no collusion?

 

So essentially you have drawn a collusion not supported by facts and will use any means necessary to prove your collusion. Typical of leftist