Question about climate change

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by Ronstar, Feb 27, 2019.

  1. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The raw data is modeled or did you not know that?
     
  2. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We don’t take the one thing we know and apply it to everything. The world is more complicated. “Modeling” in math is done to develope predictable tendencies during developmental stages. In practical applications, in math, we say data is processed and put into a more usable form. Satillites can take temperature readings, send the data to computers on earth which can then give accurate readings in charts like this...then, we can know where the thermal expansion occurs which affects sea level.
    upload_2019-4-11_22-23-19.jpeg
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2019
  3. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your the one of the guys who sat in the back of science class and threw spit balls then tried to cheat off others during quizzes, right ?
     
  4. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Youre funny. You should be the embarrassed one. You claim to be smarter then NASA. In the correlation of, man and his IQ , a sudden drop occrrred when Faux News came on the air.
     
  5. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    35,786
    Likes Received:
    8,617
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We did our homework and earned advanced degrees in engineering. Alarmists not so much.
     
  6. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    35,786
    Likes Received:
    8,617
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How does NASA explain the Medieval, Roman, Minoan, and the other warm periods in our present interglacial period. CO2 was constant and lower than today. Temperature in those three warming periods and the majority of the previous nine warm periods was greater than today.
     
  7. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have a great idea. Go to the NASA web site, and use their search function. Do you need help ?
     
  8. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Or how about 3 million years ago when CO2 was as high as it is today. No MILFS driving around in SUVs.
     
    Robert and AFM like this.
  9. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    35,786
    Likes Received:
    8,617
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Alarmists don’t believe in million year old physics.
     
    Robert likes this.
  10. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    35,786
    Likes Received:
    8,617
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What does NASA say ??
     
  11. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    35,786
    Likes Received:
    8,617
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Who is “we” ??
     
  12. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ah, modern man has been on earth only for about 200,000 years. So you believe in evolution ? That’s a relief.
     
  13. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sane people who believe that every major institutional research facility, our military, every country and accredited university ( Trump U doesn’t count) in the world can’t all be wrong together like the lunatic deniers. Please name one that agrees with you...just one.
     
  14. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You can’t go to their web site and search through their work on climate change ? It’s frightening to go out side of the bubble.
     
  15. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Bragging about a degree from a university they don’t even agree with anymore, is hysterical. There are no universities or colleges that give out engineering degrees that support what you say about AGW.
     
  16. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Modern Physics is only several hundred years old. Man kind wasn’t even around then.
     
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2019
  17. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2019
    politicalcenter likes this.
  18. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    35,786
    Likes Received:
    8,617
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Physics has been around since the big bang.
     
  19. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    35,786
    Likes Received:
    8,617
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Droughts are the result of weather driven by decadal ocean temperature oscillations. The great Texas and California droughts last only a few years. The droughts had nothing to do with CO2 increases of ~ 1.8 ppm per year.
     
  20. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    35,786
    Likes Received:
    8,617
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Analyzing data is a learned skill. The data does not support the alarmism of the AGW fanatics.
     
  21. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    35,786
    Likes Received:
    8,617
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Do your homework. It's telling that you know nothing about those who acknowledge global warming (which is everyone), agree that increasing CO2 contributes to that warming, agree via economic analysis and the study of history that global warming is beneficial, and agree that the green energy policies reduce the capability to adapt to local climate related situations by reducing economic growth.
     
  22. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    35,786
    Likes Received:
    8,617
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you don't know what NASA says ??
     
  23. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I know what the overall consensus at NASA is and what the general consensus of every accredited university in the world is . I’m embarrassed for you that you have to ask and are too lazy to look it up yourself.
     
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2019
  24. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    35,786
    Likes Received:
    8,617
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What is that consensus ???
     
  25. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Look it up. Did yo momma do your HW in school for too ?
     

Share This Page