Antarctic Ice growing, not shrinking https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddar...ns-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses
There is no correlation between atmospheric CO2 concentration in the natural history of the Earth. That’s a fact. Examples of that are the 9 warming/cooling cycles of the Holocene. Prove that wrong.
How does arctic sea ice now compare to 1962 ?? Why do all the sea ice graphs start in the late 70’s when arctic sea ice was a maximum ??
Studies I have seen from scientists state that first it warms, the warming releases carbon dioxide, so there is more carbon dioxide once it warms than before.
The center is for universal healthcare, more strict gun control and AGW mitigation. You don’t seem to live in the real world. Your center is Moscow.
In the current ~ 10,000 year Holocene CO2 was steady at 260 +/- 5 ppm through 9 warming & cooling cycles half of which had higher rates of temperature rise and higher maximum temperature than our current warming period with CO2 rise from 280 to 400 ppm. There’s no correlation.
Take the test. I am only 1 click from dead center. I bet you are far left. Who pays for this universal health care? The bulk of us or the rich? Strict gun control is fighting against the constitution. AGW we will let you keep handling that part. https://www.politicalcompass.org/test
Or they produce a graph showing it’s 270 +/- 5 ppm and claim “wrongness” not realizing that they have produced more evidence that there is no correlation between global warming & global cooling and CO2. Too funny.
I was surprised my mark moved a bit more right. But clearly I am not an authoritarian. Democrats are powerful authoritarians. I don't care if they lie, they are powerful authoritarians. I measure their BS by acts and not words. ACTS prove how much authoritarian they are. They will even try to shove national healthcare down your throat. I leave people alone on that.
The topic being discussed was the correlation of CO2 and temperature. You went off on a wild political rant to derail that topic, like you always do. We talk about science, you troll and deflect. It's bashed because it's wrong. You always run from the debunkings of your nonsense, whining about how mean everyone is as a deflection. That's more obvious deflection on your part. Please restrict your refusal to discuss what you parrot about Curry to your Curry trolling thread. Again, stop trolling. If you don't want to discuss what's being discussed, say nothing.
I just specifically pointed out the dishonesty of cherrypicking the Zwally paper, ignoring every other paper, and then pretending Zwally was the only paper on the topic. Yet right after I did so, you specifically engaged in that exact dishonest cherrypicking.
Much lower, obviously. Because that's when satellite observations started. As usual, you don't the most basic things. Who told it to you such nonsense, and why did you fall for it?