Deutsche Bank Staff Saw Suspicious Activity in Trump and Kushner Accounts

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by The Mello Guy, May 20, 2019.

  1. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,096
    Likes Received:
    37,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    JACKSONVILLE, Fla. — Anti-money-laundering specialists at Deutsche Bank recommended in 2016 and 2017 that multiple transactions involving legal entities controlled by Donald J. Trump and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, be reported to a federal financial-crimes watchdog.

    The transactions, some of which involved Mr. Trump’s now-defunct foundation, set off alerts in a computer system designed to detect illicit activity, according to five current and former bank employees. Compliance staff members who then reviewed the transactions prepared so-called suspicious activity reports that they believed should be sent to a unit of the Treasury Department that polices financial crimes.

    But executives at Deutsche Bank, which has lent billions of dollars to the Trump and Kushner companies, rejected their employees’ advice. The reports were never filed with the government.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ny...business/deutsche-bank-trump-kushner.amp.html

    Seems to fit a president who is going lawsuit crazy to hide his personal finances. I don’t think even his supporters would be surprised if he’s laundering money. More Russian ties that lead the fbi to look into the trump campaign.
     
  2. jack4freedom

    jack4freedom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    19,874
    Likes Received:
    8,447
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If everybody else in America is subjected to having their bank act not as a fiduciary, but a backstabbing government informant, so should Trump and Kushner be subjected.
     
  3. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    71,335
    Likes Received:
    91,182
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Russia GIVES Clinton $145 million but Trump is who the Times reports on. If only the Times would attempt to get to the bottom of the scandals surrounding the IRS, DOJ, EPA, FBI, email servers, destroyed evidence, lying to the FBI and congress, spying on reporters, rigged primaries, skimmed DNC money, etc.
     
    Merwen likes this.
  4. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,096
    Likes Received:
    37,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hey I’d you're looking launder Russian money, Deutsch is the bank to go with.
     
    TomFitz likes this.
  5. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,096
    Likes Received:
    37,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No they didn’t and you’ve been shown that 100 times.
    Why don’t you care if trump is a money launderer? Because you imagine someone else did something?
     
  6. jack4freedom

    jack4freedom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    19,874
    Likes Received:
    8,447
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How do I apply to get a couple hundred million of that Russian money?
     
  7. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,096
    Likes Received:
    37,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It’s the side of polonium tea you should be worried about
     
    Merwen likes this.
  8. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    71,335
    Likes Received:
    91,182
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Money launderer, you essentially mean tax cheat. Do you want to go there?
     
  9. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nobody cares!
     
    PrincipleInvestment likes this.
  10. apexofpurple

    apexofpurple Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2018
    Messages:
    5,552
    Likes Received:
    7,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    An underling was carrying out a low level number crunching task and forwarded an irregularity to a supervisor for proper review whereupon it was dismissed as being innocuous.

    Media steps in and now the low level number cruncher is an "expert professional" and the review was of course corrupt because clearly an $80 billion dollar bank would risk massive fines and censures trying to cover for a single client whom also happens to be the most reviewed and investigated individual on the ****ing planet.
     
    Merwen, Labouroflove and Nunya D. like this.
  11. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Two words - Tiffany Trump...

    She's not quite the looker Ivanka is, so that might make it easier for you....
     
    jack4freedom likes this.
  12. US Conservative

    US Conservative Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2015
    Messages:
    66,099
    Likes Received:
    68,212
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Let the dream die.
     
  13. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,096
    Likes Received:
    37,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Where does one get money they need to launder?
     
  14. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,096
    Likes Received:
    37,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mean ignore new revelations? Why would we do that?
     
    bx4 likes this.
  15. bx4

    bx4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2016
    Messages:
    15,305
    Likes Received:
    12,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you are correct then I'm sure the DOJ will come to the same conclusion.
     
    apexofpurple and AKS like this.
  16. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,096
    Likes Received:
    37,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yah it’s not like this is a bank with a history of laundering Russian money.
    Oh yah, it is
     
  17. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,096
    Likes Received:
    37,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yah it’s not like this is a bank with a history of laundering Russian money.
    Oh yah, it is

    You act like people don’t get caught doing stupid **** all the time. Flynn lied about a call he knew the fbi had a transcript of lol
     
    bx4 likes this.
  18. PrincipleInvestment

    PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    23,170
    Likes Received:
    16,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes it is. Unfortunately money laudering is wide spread. HSBC still holds the US record, it's fines and penalties until recently dwarfed Deutsche banks. Wells Fargo just got caught again. This time for laundering drug cartel money. Wells Fargo has paid $163 million in fines for money laudering, not including what will be tacke on as a result of yesterdays guilty plea. Americans, just like the rest of global borrowers, have no idea who their mortgage holders depositors are. Same goes for credit cards.
     
    Last edited: May 21, 2019
  19. bx4

    bx4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2016
    Messages:
    15,305
    Likes Received:
    12,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Right. So it would be prudent for the FBI and Congress to investigate transactions that threw up red flags. Agreed?
     
  20. PrincipleInvestment

    PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    23,170
    Likes Received:
    16,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No that's what the US Treasury and IRS do. Special counsel Mueller already subpoenaed and reviewed Trump's Deustche bank records, so the DOJ is satisfied just like the Treasury & IRS. It's never going to be prudent for congress to undermine the constitution, or assert some phony directorship of the DOJ.
     
    Nunya D. likes this.
  21. bx4

    bx4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2016
    Messages:
    15,305
    Likes Received:
    12,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    According to this report, Treasury / IRS didn't investigate. Because the bank took the decision NOT to report it.

    Mueller wasn't looking into money laundering and we don't know if he ever got these particular records. It seems entirely appropriate for someone to look into it. Treasury / IRS, FBI. And Congress has an oversight role, as confirmed by yesterday's court ruling.
     
    Last edited: May 21, 2019
  22. PrincipleInvestment

    PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    23,170
    Likes Received:
    16,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Mueller subpoenaed and received Trump's Deustche bank records 2 yrs ago. The top US Treasury / IRS fraud unit investigators were assigned to team Mueller 3 yrs ago. Congress has no oversight of non government financial activity. The US Treasury / IRS and DOJ who indicted Deustche, began investigating in 2016. It examined ALL of Deustche commercial mortgages / loans from 2005-2015. Team Mueller had access to all those financials, and didn't need a subpoena to review them. Even if Mueller didn't, congress still doesn't have oversight over that banking entity or it's borrowers.
     
    Labouroflove likes this.
  23. bx4

    bx4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2016
    Messages:
    15,305
    Likes Received:
    12,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you are convinced that these red flags have been fully investigated. A lot of people aren't convinced. It was not part of Mueller's brief to investigate money laundering.
    And Congress DOES have oversight of the President. If he committed felony bank fraud or money laundering, that would be pretty good grounds for impeachment. They can investigate and see where it leads.
     
    TomFitz likes this.
  24. TomFitz

    TomFitz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2013
    Messages:
    40,737
    Likes Received:
    16,202
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry, but Trump’s lawyers got laughed out of the courtroom yesterday when they tried to peddle that argument.
     
    WalterSobchak likes this.
  25. E_Pluribus_Venom

    E_Pluribus_Venom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    15,691
    Likes Received:
    151
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Doesn't surprise me.
     

Share This Page