Hillary Clinton to give keynote speech at cyber security summit

Discussion in 'United States' started by MolonLabe2009, Jun 1, 2019.

  1. Lil Mike

    Lil Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    51,651
    Likes Received:
    22,951
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Remind me which security agency said the Russians were working for Trump?
     
  2. TomFitz

    TomFitz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2013
    Messages:
    40,668
    Likes Received:
    16,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh, so you just made it up. Again.
     
  3. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Her speaking at the cyber security summit? No, that's true.

    The bullet points? No, those are also true.
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2019
  4. straight ahead

    straight ahead Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2014
    Messages:
    5,648
    Likes Received:
    6,563
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm with her. [​IMG]
     
  5. Fred C Dobbs

    Fred C Dobbs Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    19,496
    Likes Received:
    9,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So the Russians were smarter than the Obama Administration, the FBI, CIA, DNC and Hillary Clinton? If that 's so then it's a good thing Trump won. The country needed smarter people.
     
  6. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why do you think they were smarter than the Obama administration or the FBI or the CIA. They all knew what was going on. It is only the moron the Russians elected that continues to deny the Rusdian efforts.
     
  7. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Interesting you can't figure out the difference between working to elect Trump and working for Trump. Or would you care to rephrase the question?
     
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2019
  8. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah sure the hacking was done by the imaginary Gussifer2. But if you don't believ the America security agencies I guess all you have left is Trump who doesn't even believe the Russians tried to influence the election.
     
  9. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry but Mueller didn't say there was no collusion. Make the effort and read what the report actually said.
     
  10. Fred C Dobbs

    Fred C Dobbs Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    19,496
    Likes Received:
    9,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If they all knew it why didn't they stop it? Or warn the candidates? You seem to be saying that the FBI and CIA knew of Russian involvement all along but did nothing.

    Seems a Grand Jury should be appointed to investigate all of this. Would you agree?
     
    Steve N likes this.
  11. Fred C Dobbs

    Fred C Dobbs Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    19,496
    Likes Received:
    9,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If there was collusion there would be indictments. No indictments, no collusion.
     
  12. GrayMan

    GrayMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Messages:
    8,373
    Likes Received:
    3,518
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The exact words in the report.. "
    Although the investigation
    established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and
    worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from
    information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its
    election interference activities."
     
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2019
    Lil Mike likes this.
  13. HB Surfer

    HB Surfer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    34,707
    Likes Received:
    21,899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Tell us more! More!

    [​IMG]
     
    Fred C Dobbs likes this.
  14. Fred C Dobbs

    Fred C Dobbs Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    19,496
    Likes Received:
    9,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Everyone who's been paying attention knows that the Russians, along with a Brit, worked to influence the election. It was the British/Russian dossier, paid for by Hillary Clinton and accepted by highly placed bureaucrats in the FBI and CIA, who started it all. They even used the Russian/British/DNC Dossier in the FISA Court to spy on innocent American citizens.

    But you knew that, right?

    The Brit involved is not cooperating. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...Gateway Pundit on May 28, 2019 at 03:06:06 PM
     
    Steve N likes this.
  15. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Exactly and you have trouble understanding the difference between " did not establsh" and there was no collusion. And if you keep reading you will see Muellers explanation of the reasons why potentially collusion could not be established. Muelker didn't claim that without the obstruction collusion would have been proven but he did explain why he used the " did not establish" instead of as Barr claimed " there was no collusion"
     
  16. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Love your self portrait.
     
  17. Fred C Dobbs

    Fred C Dobbs Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    19,496
    Likes Received:
    9,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "Did not establish" means exactly what it says.
     
  18. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nope sorry Manifort was being surveilled long before the dossier. In fact if I remember correctlynTrump was warned not to hire Manifort as his campaign chairman because of his suspected Russian ties. Of course as history has proven Trump hired him exactly for that reason.
     
  19. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Good you are learning the difference. Now you just need to educate Barr and Trump! The dunce and his puppet AG.
     
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2019
  20. GrayMan

    GrayMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Messages:
    8,373
    Likes Received:
    3,518
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I've made it through jury selection because I have the mindset of innocent until proven guiltily engrained en me brain!

    Also science and empirical evidence and all that stuff. I'm sure you are still trying to find evidence that invisible unicorns don't exist. Good luck with that.
     
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2019
  21. Fred C Dobbs

    Fred C Dobbs Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    19,496
    Likes Received:
    9,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Never mentioned Manafort, who was found guilty of financial crimes which had nothing whatsoever to do with Russia. But you're right about the surveillance starting early on members of the Trump campaign and Trump himself in the Trump Tower. That's why he moved to a secure location immediately after he was informed. All members of the Trump campaign were being spied upon, and unmasked. The same happened thing to Michael Flynn.

    Several of them will be getting repaid for their expenses and loss of reputation because of this witch hunt. It's worse than McCarthyism ever was.
     
  22. Fred C Dobbs

    Fred C Dobbs Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    19,496
    Likes Received:
    9,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why? What was established?
     
  23. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    :wall:
     
  24. GrayMan

    GrayMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Messages:
    8,373
    Likes Received:
    3,518
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The courtjester believes that because we cannot prove the jester isn't a rapist, he is therefore a rapist.
     
  25. gamewell45

    gamewell45 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    Messages:
    24,711
    Likes Received:
    3,547
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Fake news.
     

Share This Page