Republican's Latest Monumental Faux Pas

What are you talking about ? What I stated had nothing to do with the "Global Warming Issue" or predictions related to Global warming. You are clearly dazed and confused.

Just because the procreation argument made no sense is no reason to go into some kind of mindless La La La neverland state of denial and fantasy. Get a hold of yourself man - being wrong once in awhile is not the end of the world

 

It hasn't been changed in 50 years....try to keep up

 

And it was when Roe v. Wade struck down ineffectual anti-abortion laws.
But laws aren't created in a vacuum. When only 9% of Americans think that abortion should be completely outlawed under any circumstances, then odds of it making a comeback are pretty damn slim.

 

What does that have to do with anything?

 

Court rulings can be overturned.

Yes, it's common sense to protect the unborn.

Then why should a newborn have choice? It can't do a damn thing for itself. If it's not taken care of it will die.

 

Then you better come up with a decent argument because NO argument has caused RvW to be overturned in 50 years.

Only to you.

Because a newborn is BORN and therefore a legal person with protections and rights.

AND you did NOT ANSWER MY QUESTIONS:
FoxHastings said: ↑
NONE.NOW do what NO other Anti-Choicer has ever done....EXPLAIN how a fetus would make a choice even if it had the right to.HOW? HOW does a fetus make a choice????? Call his Congressman on his cell phone????


YOU said fetuses should have a choice but can't answer questions about your statement???????

Must not have a leg to stand on...

 

The law was created for women and women can make sure it stands..

 

You both realize that Kavanaugh has explicitly endorsed Roe v Wade in the only decision he had that actually dealt with it?

The dueling biases you both exhibit, completely blind to objective fact, are truly amusing

 

You saw how well when (your claim) Slavery was the law of the country was working out. And without knowing a thing about how the people felt, still congress changed the law.
lesson learned: Congress makes laws that must be obeyed.

Frankly Natty you dodge how laws are made. The SC ruled on privacy. I do not recall the SC commented on Viability.

 

So, the law wasn't created for the innocent unborn?

That's sad.

 

Cut us in on your secret. Do you allege you are trained on constitutional law?

 

No democrat or their sycophants has explained why 2 justices did not agree with them!! (Roe v Wade) We had polls declaring Hillary The winner so the public is not always right.

In Roe v Wade not all justices agreed. Naturally this confuses Democrats.

 

Recall how the SC handled slavery; then Congress took the issue up.

Recall how the court killed the income tax until congress took care of that.

 

Requiring constitutional amendments both times.

My point is about Kavanaugh and anyone expecting him to go against Roe v Wade being ignorant.

If you think anything is going to get done of the football that is abortion, you're not really understanding how the game is played.

 

FFS, you have said that. I answered that there is no STATE constitution that has a right to be in the abortion business but healthcare is in the Constitution.

 

Healthcare is not in the constitution. Stop making crap up.

 

That's, DUH, because it didn't....it left that to the states but the states could NOT ban abortion outright...

 

I am glad you're sad...


""MolonLabe2009 said: ↑
The law was created by man and can be changed by man.""



So, the law wasn't created for the unborn ?




AND you did NOT ANSWER MY QUESTIONS:
FoxHastings said: ↑
NONE.NOW do what NO other Anti-Choicer has ever done....EXPLAIN how a fetus would make a choice even if it had the right to.HOW? HOW does a fetus make a choice????? Call his Congressman on his cell phone????


YOU said fetuses should have a choice but can't answer questions about your statement???????

Must not have a leg to stand on...

 

So we should just execute poor people rather than giving them Hospital care? You don't want a baby don't get pregnant.You volunteered for service when you drop your panties.

 

What my argument is ... that had Democrats passed a law allowing abortion, we would not be arguing since the law would have been non debatable. They truly screwed up.

They actually revisit this issue during each election period. Strictly to foment a divided nation and to create disharmony.

 

Unless the US Supreme Court finds a law passed by Congress or a state legislature to be unconstitutional, it is enforceable.

Under its 1973 ruling, a law that bans abortions is unconstitutional.

Before viability, making a private decision concerning pregnancy is the right of the American who is pregnant, in consultation with her medical and spiritual advisers, trusted friends and family, as she determines.

There are some who want the State to seize control and impersonally dictate to her, but such Big Government intrusion in unconstitutional - as well as immoral in the view of many.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
That's, DUH, because it didn't....it left that to the states but the states could NOT ban abortion outright...

I straighten you out and YOU change the argument.

And NO it is NOT the Democrats who bring up abortion...it is the Republicans and their constant attempts to chip away at women's rights that bring it into focus .

Trying to take way half the population's rights SHOULD divide a nation and create disharmony as those who believe in rights for everyone defend and protect rights..

IF you don't want division and disharmony KEEP THE HELL OUT OF OTHER PEOPLE'S RIGHTS!!!!!!

 

2 justices agreed with me. I feel great about that.

I completely understand the entire law. I do not need a lecture from you.

The issue was not abortion as much as it was privacy rights.

I have tried to learn who here has played a role in abortions but none but me has confessed;

 

No the Court will toss it because it was an extremely flawed case that never should have been heard in the first place.

I can't believe its lasted this long actually.

We studied the merits of it in one of my classes and it doesn't even come close to qualifying to be heard.

With the current makeup of the Court I don't see any way they keep it.

You will have to bring another case in front of them that's legit to get your ruling.

Hell, Roberts will probably side with you guys anyways.

 

There you go again.attacking me for offering the cure to YOUR PROBLEM,. I see this happen every time Democrats bring it up. Every Democrat speaks for abortion but no republicans run around making this an issue.