Republican's Latest Monumental Faux Pas

You lose.

Prior to viability, the State is prohibited from seizing control of the womb from the woman.

 

Apparently per Democrats, Even Democrats do not since I handed them a way to force abortion to be law and they want nothing to do with it. lt is no more than an election slogan to democrats.

 

My executed children lost.

 

And then people will really see the cost

And it will not be pretty. There is a reason why nearly every other country in the world is moving towards reducing restrictions on abortion

 

What is this cost you think we will see?

 

All I can say is that based on past “plans” it would have to have greater rooting in reality to be accepted by anyone

 

You can claim that you had children who were "executed", but you are not allowed to force your personal perspective upon all Americans.

Before viability, women control their wombs, not your politicians.

 

Ya, it was so flawed (according to YOU) that it lasted 50 years...

Yes, even Roberts believes even women have a right to their own bodies even if Anti-Choicers don't.

 

You are already seeing it
Rise in maternal and infant mortality

Then there is this


It will be someone you know. Someone you probably do not even suspect ever would, they will probably be married and in a stable relationship

But all it will need is another young woman like Savita to die

debate

https://www.irishexaminer.com/viewp...navar-changed-the-abortion-debate-461787.html

The lucky ones will get to Canada or some state that does still allow abortion

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
That's, DUH, because it didn't....it left that to the states but the states could NOT ban abortion outright...




I straighten you out and YOU change the argument.

And NO it is NOT the Democrats who bring up abortion...it is the Republicans and their constant attempts to chip away at women's rights that bring it into focus .

Trying to take way half the population's rights SHOULD divide a nation and create disharmony as those who believe in rights for everyone defend and protect rights..

IF you don't want division and disharmony KEEP THE HELL OUT OF OTHER PEOPLE'S RIGHTS!!!!!!

I did not attack you. You just don't like what I posted.

How TF can you say I attacked you when you didn't read the post you quoted:

"""...it is the Republicans and their constant attempts to chip away at women's rights that bring it into focus .""""

 

Number ONE: Women would lose the right to their own body...that is a terrible cost.

Then who will be next???


Number two: More unwanted babies for Repubs to whine about supporting with their taxes ..

 

Not according to me but legal scholars.

I was taught about it, its not my opinion.

https://www.mccl.org/post/2017/01/20/the-three-fundamental-problems-with-roe-v-wade

 

Don’t forget guns! Guns! Guns!

And with the NRA no longer able to afford the scaremongering it has been doing......

 

Why wouldn't they just go to a state that votes to keep abortion legal?

 

Drug users have no right to put anything they want into their veins either.

Sorry but women have shown they cannot be responsible enough to handle not killing babies so we must make that decision for them.

The were given the opportunity and failed.

 

These two posts contradict each other.

 

A so called “pro life” site

How nice

Tell me, why do NONE of these sites mention one muffling word about the infant mortality rates in America?



I would have WAAAAAAY more respect if they also addresses this

 

Waaaaaa!

And the men irresponsible enough to get the women pregnant? Should they not also have to pay a price. Tell you what. Let’s remove one testicle for every unwanted pregnancy. That should make the men show some responsibility

 

Don't look at the site itself, look for who they quote which I provided to you.

So it's not just me, these are pro choice people who are experts in constitutional law saying this.

 

I have no issue with that, he can use a condom just like she can buy one for him.

They are both at fault.

 

And actual abortions after the first trimester are vanishingly small

Wha5 has happened is that the so called anti abortion laws are delaying the inevitable

 

I don’t waste time with cherry picked twaddle

Post from a neutral site

Preferably scientific research

 

No they don't.

If a fetus can't have choice, then why a newborn? A newborn can't make any decisions on its own and needs to be taken care or else it will die.

 

Scientific research for a legal issue?

 

A newborn can't make its own choices.

So, newborns are also fair game to be terminated???