Discussion regarding Harrit's Bentham thermite paper...

Discussion in '9/11' started by Gamolon, Sep 30, 2016.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I see that you're afraid to address the hypocrisy of what you post.

    Likewise. I am using your posts above to show your biased and hypocritical view regarding Wayne's information and other people's views that refute what he says. You use the "you're not an expert" excuse on those you are against what you post/believe, but refuse to apply that same reason to those who support what you post/believe.
     
  2. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I see that you’re afraid to address any of the massive 9/11 investigative failures about NIST and the 9/11 Commission. Only to consistently take an apologist point of view. I posted the facts, there’s nothing hypocritical about that. Coste wrote his opinion and I agree with him, plain and simple, you don’t? Who cares?
     
  3. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No chance. You have only one agenda and it’s not about me. It’s clearly about defending the OCT at all costs, which includes never ever criticizing any of it and always criticizing everyone and everything that contradicts or even just questions it. You want to talk about bias and hypocrisy, you are the OCT poster boy.
     
  4. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You speak out of both sides of your mouth. You agree with Coste yet he is not an expert in the field. I thought being an expert in the field was a characteristic you needed someone to have in order for their view/analysis to hold any water?
     
  5. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    No chance. You have only one agenda and it’s not about me. It’s clearly about criticizing the OCT at all costs, which includes never ever criticizing other conspiracy theories and always criticizing everyone and everything that contradicts or even just questions what you say. You want to talk about bias and hypocrisy, you are the conspiracy theory poster boy.

    Funny how just changing a few words in the quote you made describes you perfectly.
     
    Shinebox likes this.
  6. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Boring Gamolon, keep your day job, this one isn’t working for you.
     
  7. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    It wasn't meant to keep you entertained Bobby. I am using your posts so others can see your hypocrisy and unwavering support of anything that pushes conspiracies, not matter true or false.
     
  8. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Knock yourself out bro, you are still boring and have zero to offer in the way of scrutinizing the OCT and the criminals who invented it. By defending it relentlessly knowing full well it is in fact a fairy tale you are just another co-conspirator.
     
  9. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I guess that makes you a co-conspirator of all the brain dead folks who invent the conspiracies that you refuse to scrutinize while knowing full well that they are fairy tales.
     
  10. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Below is just more of Bobby's hypocrisy about dismissing people's opinions/information because they aren't experts. I wonder why Wayne hasn't fallen into Bobby's "non expert" group and why Wayne's opinion hasn't been rejected by Bobby because he's NOT an expert?
     
  11. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Boring jibberish not interested, same with your next piece of garbage. You will know when you post something interesting that I can use.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2019
  12. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    So is what you and Wayne Coste post as neither of you are experts in the field and anything either of you post should be dismissed because of that. Right Bobby? That's what YOU do...
     
  13. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Incorrect. Wayne Coste has published many credible 9/11 articles, you haven’t published squat and your only expertise lies in defending the OCT at all costs and criticizing everything and anyone that contradicts or questions it. I post and discuss what EXPERTS have published for those who are interested. Any reader who wants to dismiss anything for any reason does so as his/her prerogative not because you say so. I don’t dismiss everything you post, I just extract what I can use from your posts as necessary for my own personal agenda and reject the rest of your nonsense.
     
  14. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You mean in relation to his eletrcial engineering field? Which is what he's an EXPERT in? Please point me in the direction of "credible" 9/11 articles where his expertise in electrical engineering was applied to prove something related to 9/11.

    Remember your mantra Bobby. Any opinion/explanation provided by someone without expertise in the relevent field should be dismissed.
     
  15. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don’t have any such “mantra” and you are continuing to bore me with your nonsense. If you need to read any Coste article on the subject of 9/11 (which I’m sure you don’t) I take it you know how to use Google.
     

Share This Page