Too much to read right now, but the last I’ve heard is no one really knows where the exported uranium finally ended up and you article, from what little I’ve read, lays the responsibility on Obama.
Too much for you to read now or ever because if you did, it would be explained to you and made clear no crime was commited and you don't want it explained to you because then you would have one less thing to pin on Hillary Clinton.
Ummm....I want to carefully read how your trying to sell our selling of nuclear fuel to ‘ the enemy of democracy’ (those are your words not mine) is justified before I respond.
I thought the purpose for Trump voters to vote for Trump was to vote in something different? But since he has become President I hear his voter saying "BUT OBAMA DID IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" If you were so pissed off that Obama did it you should be pissed off that Trump did it Unless it is okay for a white man to do it and not a black man.
lol... Democrats want to be upset after what Hillary Clinton, The Obama Administration, Australia, UK, and Italy did to Trump last election. What a joke. Seriously? You all have the nerve to be upset?
You are quite correct for the most part here. However I note the phrasing that you use. "NOBODY involved was a foreign adversary". While the British are not foreign adversaries they ARE foreigners. That makes it no different in regards to our national elections (and certainly shouldn't when it comes to our laws). You may see a difference and accept one while not the other. I see them as the same when it comes to our elections. Both have their own goals which does not always align with that of The People in the US. I don't want either one of them to attempt to influence our elections. Of course I don't want the US government to interfere in other countries elections either. Yet it does. And they (foreign governments) do also. That is simply a fact of life. The best way to nullify such is give them nothing worth reporting about. All those leaked emails that Russia obtained via the DNC hacks? Those wouldn't have done a damn bit of good to Trump, or anyone else, if the DNC hadn't acted the way that they had. If they had been on the up and up the entire time then none of this would have been an issue. None of it. The only way you get dirt off someone...is if they get dirty. That too is a fact of life.
Holy crap, did you just bring race into this? And you guys say it’s everyone else but you who is consumed with race. Obama is half white, why is that never mentioned, because in the left’s world automatically makes him a racist. Jesus Christ, the friggin race card. It never ends.
Of course we would. I think anyone would use derogatory information But not from a foreign government. And if they did they would be called out and rightfully so.
Do I really have to explain the differences between taking opposition research from an ally to the United States versus taking whatever garbage a foreign adversary will give on a US citizen and presidential candidate? Really? FYI, Great Britain is a democratic country, Russia (believe it or not) is not a true democratic republic and neither is China or Saudi Arabia. It's against the law, do you understand that? It is against US law to collude with a foreign adversary.
Trump is not stupid. He knows what he is doing. He knows his followers are stupid and will believe anything he says.
It's illegal. That's all you need to know. 18 U.S. Code § 953. Private correspondence with foreign governments Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. The Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. § 953, enacted January 30, 1799) is a United States federal law that criminalizes negotiation by unauthorized persons with foreign governments having a dispute with the United States. The intent behind the Act is to prevent unauthorized negotiations from undermining the government's position