13-Year-Old Girl Gets Publicly Shouted Down When She Compares Abortion To Slavery

DUHHHH, she TALKED.

 

I'm pro-choice when it comes to the government involvement. I do not believe that the government should tell people how to think, or what to think. So from a law standpoint I would never support an anti-abortion law that is pre-viability.

However I am also, on a personal level, against abortion and I think much the same way as that girl.

Don't dismiss her just because she's 13. I've met some 13 year olds that have more common sense and smarts than other adults that I know. She very well could have come to her conclusions on her own. She's old enough. My daughter is 12, yet she talks about non-binary people etc etc and supports them 100%. That certainly did not come from me as I think that such things are stupid. There are only two genders. My wife thinks the same. So wherever my daughter got this from it sure wasn't from us.

 

Salute her mother? What for, not having the brains to keep her legs shut because she didn't want more children?

I hope people aren't saluting someone who's taf.

 

You're free to walk around as long as you don't walk into a church.

... And take care of her other three children.

Her body, her life, her business. MYOB.

 

True. But a child in the womb is also a separate entity, captive and completely dependent upon its host. Invited as it were, its lodging paid for ahead of time via intercourse and orgasm. Is it ethical to rent out a room, receive payment, and then kill the guest when it arrives to free up the room for another go? Just so you know, I'm playing devils advocate here.

 

I can't think of anything more sad than being pro-abortion.

 

You assume the children of reactionaries will themselves be reactionatires.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Sad that she never learned what true slavery is....having the right to your own body taken away.....exactly what Anti-Choicers want to do to women.

(It's only "obviously" to YOU it isn't obvious at all)

NO, she is in error in her comparison. Mine is correct.

Sad that she never learned what true slavery is....having the right to your own body taken away.....exactly what Anti-Choicers want to do to women.

There is no "child " in the womb.

It was not "invited". The woman had sex, she did not "invite" something to grow inside her. Oh, she could "invite" all she wants but that doesn't mean sex will end up in pregnancy.


Consent to sex is not consent to any other act.




If one rents out a room and the renter attacks or harms them in anyway they have a perfect right to kick the renter out.


And , I'm sorry , but your statement: """"its lodging paid for ahead of time via intercourse and orgasm."".is just too silly to address...

 

Or more enlightened and supportive of women's rights than being pro-choice.

Or more intellectually dishonest than misrepresenting pro-choice as pro-abortion.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Slavery: having the right to one's body taken away.

Banning abortion: Having the right to one's body taken away.

So slavery isn't "sad" for you?

Now, can you tell me what your statement had to do with the post of mine you quoted?

BTW, there are no "Pro-Abortion " people.

There ARE Pro-Choice people who believe women have rights, too......and want to defend them...

 

Being pro-choice inevitably leads to more abortions. That can't be argued.

Pro-choice is pro-abortion.

 

Slavery is sad. Very sad. It's indefensible and grotesque.

Abortion is worse.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Slavery: having the right to one's body taken away.

Banning abortion: Having the right to one's body taken away.







So slavery isn't "sad" for you?

Now, can you tell me what your statement had to do with the post of mine you quoted?

BTW, there are no "Pro-Abortion " people.

There ARE Pro-Choice people who believe women have rights, too......and want to defend them...

LOL! Says someone who has never been pregnant nor a slave !!! Hilarious!!!!!


Sounds like you'd rather people be born so they can enjoy slavery.....LOL!

 

So you have to be a slave to have an opinion on slavery?

Liberal logic.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Slavery: having the right to one's body taken away.

Banning abortion: Having the right to one's body taken away.



So slavery isn't "sad" for you?

Now, can you tell me what your statement had to do with the post of mine you quoted?

BTW, there are no "Pro-Abortion " people.

There ARE Pro-Choice people who believe women have rights, too......and want to defend them...


LOL! Says someone who has never been pregnant nor a slave !!! Hilarious!!!!!


Sounds like you'd rather people be born so they can enjoy slavery.....LOL!

No, but it is safe and easy to have an opinion on two things that will never happen to you..


BTW, thanks for requoting my post

 

Because there's no difference between using kids to promote one message and another.

 

And not just lib party girls!

 

What does this have to do with the rights of unborn children?

 

Kids like this are the future of the GOP! The future is bright! Although she would need some refinement in her speech giving, but she has many years ahead of her to improve on that!

 

Your correlation is simply not based in, logic, because you created a generalized decision maker instead of equating two (2) specific, exact decision-makers like the youngster did in the video. Perhaps you can learn from the logic she used.

You can not go get slavery. You can go get an abortion. Yes those are two very different elements, so your foundation is flawed by you equating them to each other. The only exclusive, same exact element for both, is the decision-maker. By which, the slavery decision-maker is the 'slave owner' and the abortion decision-maker is the 'woman' ---or the 'man' forcing the woman to get an abortion she does not want.

In both cases, the enslaved and the fetus, are two (2) organisms who seek to live freely yet neither gets a say-so in their fate upon this earth.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Slavery: having the right to one's body taken away.

Banning abortion: Having the right to one's body taken away.

Which has nothing to do with, and is not comparable to , my statement. Perhaps you could learn from the logic the girl used...and re-read what I posted.

It bears no resemblance to your silly "You can not go get slavery. You can go get an abortion""

Which I didn't do, you did.

Nope, taking away a person's right to their own body is slavery.....and banning abortion is taking away women's right to their own bodies.

Prove that wrong.


HOW TF do you know what a fetus wants? You do NOT.

A slave, a BORN person, does know what they want and seek to live freely....taking away women's right to their own bodies is NOT LIVING FREELY

 

Right now that "lady" is playing in a sandbox when not on tv; let's see how she feels 10 years from now as an adult. Little kids do grow up you know.

 

If a reactionary to you is a conservative Christian who works hard, obeys the law and respects the flag I’ll be happy to have him as a citizen

 

They are the only ones who have to be reminded

 

Reminded of what?

That abortion is legal?