Is the Trump impeachment dead?

Yes that's democrats last hope since the two year long Mueller witch hunt went up in smoke

 

I don't admit to no collusion and I never have. Mueller's report proves (suggests really, it proves nothing) that the KGB can still cover their tracks fairly well, no more than that.

How anybody can examine all the evidence we have, know Donald Trump, and come to any conclusion other than his being in it up to his undyed eyeballs is beyond me.

 

TDS and denial of reality on full display. Mueller found nothing and democrats in congress have done nothing because he found nothing.

 

Dems have done nothing because Trump's Lickspittle Legion would NEVER vote against their Lord and Master and Rightful President-for-life so the whole thing would do nothing more than make him seem a martyr and while I credit the American voting populace with more intelligence than that we do have to realize who is President now.

The pubs are now trying to call the Dems unpatriotic because they WON'T impeach Trump.

 

Hard to say at this point. Mueller has left the trail of crumbs - its up to Congress to open up an impeachment investigation so they can see all supporting documents.

 

Trump did this? We were already fractured, splintered, and hacked to pieces after the rotten, hateful Obama regime had us in its grasp for eight long, miserable years....

 

It was never alive. The only purpose discussing impeachment serves now, is to build a better case for access to Trump's associates and documents. He said it best. He could kill a baby and still be beloved and adored by the GOP base.

 

You mean from the party that says, "Republicans just want to kill old people?" LOL

 

If democrats made a credible case based on some actual obstruction of justice Trump supporters would dump him and that's the point. Democrats don't have that.

 

So you are calling for impeachment with no actual crime you can point to. Just as I figured.

 

The Democrats, or one of their allies, sent me an email that they were going to do an impeachment of Trump even if there's a good chance they'll lose.

I deleted that email so I can't go back and see what it said.

 

I think Pelosi is smart or political savvy enough to know that impeaching Trump with just Democrats on board, no Republicans and most important, very few independents could backfire. Impeachment now would probably look like a very partisan political vendetta and revenge for losing an election to most independents.

Until you get at least half of independents on board, impeachment is a waste of time, energy and money and as I stated. It runs the risk of backfiring big time.

 

Congress can't make any case when they've been prevented from doing their jobs by the obstruction of Trump to the entire process.

 

You are attempting to say obstruction is why Mueller found no collusion which has nothing to do with democrats impeaching on obstruction charges. If he as you say obstructed justice in the collusion investigation let congress make their case to the American people.

 

That's precisely what the House has been attempting to do since January but Trump has again obstructed justice by ordering people not to cooperate and not turning over documents that have been requested in order for Congress to do their job.

 

Then let congress make their case in that so called obstruction to the American people and let the chips fall where they may. If Trump obviously obstructed justice he will be gone. If the charges are without merit congress looks foolish and apparently that is what they know what will happen or we would now be watching an impeachment proceeding.

 

Mueller was the one who referred those charges

 

Impeachment can be for most anything, the "high crimes and misdemeanors" should give you a clue there as "misdemeanors" can not really be "high". The whole process is directed at finding out whether one can be the POTUS, it is not really a conviction of a crime, even if the President is removed..

In any case Trump would be charged with obstruction of justice and the basis for those charges would be the instances in the report when he has seemed to impede an investigation.

 

When Obama was proposing things Republicans hated, was he also not dividing us? When looked at honestly it just seems worse when you are not for it.

 

Was it ever really alive or a possibility? I could not honestly say yes to that query. After all, Pelosi was dead set against it from the beginning and it had no possibility of proceeding without her approval.

 

This is flatly untrue. As for impeachment, what we'll probably see is impeachment hearings in the House close to election. Probably not any actual impeachment decision, and no vote from the Senate to convict.

 

Wrong... chanting "not my president " is what started the divide.

Not electing Clinton was a rejection of liberal politics by the American people.

 

it will happen, just democrats want to run against Trump in 2020, so they have to make sure he is still able to run in 2020, I think they shoudl impeach in Dec 2020 after Trump loses the election, but before the next President takes office

 

The American people rejected Trump, the ELECTORAL COLLEGE elected him President. I am NOT saying he wasn't legitimately elected or being "butthurt" but I am pointing out the indisputable fact that he was NOT ELECTED BY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE

 

deleted, machine error]