Ask your difficult questions of an Atheist.

Is that true of your house? Of your city's public library? Of construction zones? Of schools?

Not sure why you don't like walls...

 

We get back to the wall kick !
Nope. None of them have ever kept determined people out.
Especially, when they come by sea, air or are visa overstays.
Let me repeat. None of your examples have worked.

 

For someone who brutalizes English vocabulary with his miss use of punctuation and run on sentences, you should refrain from correcting my use of the word “ fact”.
Why don’t you look up the meaning of “ philosophy”.

 

You don’t know what a fact is ? They ARE something “known or proven to be true.” “Sounds” like a “proof “ to everyone who can look it up in the dictionary. Sounds like a quibble too.

 

Btw
synonyms:
reality · actuality · certainty · factuality · certitude · truth · naked truth · verity · gospel

 

Thats the problem with the whole thread! They use words they do not understand or know the meaning, if you ask them for a definition so everyone can get on the same page, all you get is pejorative hyperbole name calling and they pretend that kind of trash is a debate.

See, you, not atheists as the title pretends had to give the correct answer, and that was ridiculously easy yet that does not give them pause or a red face.

 

What are BORDERS for 500?

 

BS
You use words whose meanings you contrive to fit your narrative. I doubt you ever consult a dictionary.

 

FALSE,
I use words with meaning that is grounded in philosophical reason and logic, neoatheists are lucky to make it through the first line in a dictionary much less labor through volumes of philosophy to comprehend the essence of a word, as I have.

Hell the only people I have ever seen use 2 contradictory positions to describe themselves are the neoatheists, there is no such thing as a agno-atheist as sojme here would claim they are.

Its equally as foolish as claiming you are going left-right, but that does not stop them because they simply do not comprehend the finer distinctions that philosophy affords.

 

Why don’t you use a dictionary like everyone else. Instead, you spout your little woo woo and pretend you know wth you’re talking about.

 

It’s not up to you to label everyone else. That’s ridiculous. Just ask people what they believe.

 

Because I prefer an academic approach not the woo woo the peanut galley throws out here and fails to argue beyond. When someone fails to offer up a definition of something as simple as 'fallacy' in a philosophy thread one is forced to ask what the hell are they doing here in the first place, if not for philosophy? Woo woo? Trolling? Harassment? What?

 

It sure is up to me to label everything in my environment, at least my labels will be well researched and not the pejorative woo woo we see from neoatheists.

Hell you really want to see a shitstorm just point out how the KKK has been and most likely still are the militant arm of democrats, they cried so much woo woo flood even the mods were drowning!

People dont know what they believe, neoatheists lack the vocabulary and means to even describe the basics, hell we have a group called neoatheists who think they lack belief and of course the only way one can lack any belief is if they are a corpse or braindead. Speaking of woo woo, neoatheists have a long history we can review.

 

A pretender.

 

FALSE,
Being we defined and presenting precision accuracy to the narrative being argued is not a contrivance. Falsely claiming it is however is a contrivance.
As I said, I use an academic philosophical approach, not the woo woo side show approach to word definition.

 

Oh, people don’t know what they believe so it’s up to you to tell them ? What a sanctimonious sounding bunch of crappola.

 

Yep perfect example of neoatheist woo woo, thanks for proving my point.

 

Ha ha
That’s woo woo. There is nothing academic about your convoluted ramblings.

 

TRUE, When I see them post ludicrous trash like agno-atheist I immediately know their level of education.

 

Look up “woo woo.” You’re miss using the term, as usual.

 

Wow.....
Why don’t you guess your own ?

 

Convoluted to neoatheists, of course, they have no philosophical background. Why does that surprise you?

 

This sentence is an example of academic enlightenment ?
Choke.

 

Because philosophy is as much opinion as fact.

 

Neoatheists religion is based on woo woo, nothing too difficult there.