Reflecting on abortion <<Moderator's Warning >>

SO WHAT! It still has NOTHING to do with abortion.....THE TOPIC

 

Neither does MILK, but that didn't stop you from making a milk analogy in an abortion thread last year!

 

In your opinion.

Then I guess the government confiscates people's cancer affected body parts if cancer treatment was banned.

 

So then the death of the baby would be worth it?

 

There is no banning of cancer treatment!!!

• Strawman 1: a weak or imaginary opposition (such as an argument or adversary) set up only to be easily confuted

 

I think he means if a particular cancer treatment is banned, and there are many controversial ones that are.

 

...and there is no comparison to abortion....

 

And the same with milk, but that didn't stop you from talking about milk in the abortion debate!

 

FIRST poster to bring up the issue of MILK:....and the winner is...



chris155auWell-Known Member
Joined:
Jul 4, 2017
Messages:
16,157
Likes Received:
1,344
Trophy Points:
113
Gender:
Male
↑
Click to expand...
Women would not be "forced" to do anything if abortion was banned.


So then babies don't have the right to breast milk? If so, then I guess that you would've been perfectly okay with mothers denying their baby breast milk leading to malnourishment in the days before baby formula""""

 

Uh, no actually, that would be YOU!

 

You have my deepest sympathies...

 

And that's more than some deserve, those who will never really be affected on any kind of a personal level but just have spare time and lack empathy and insight.

 

Why, because I mentioned "milk" after you mentioned it first?

 

Are you "affected on any kind of personal level" when someone you don't know kills their BORN kid? Obviously not, so why do you think that it should be illegal?

 

There is no banning of abortion either! BOTH abortion and cancer treatment are medical procedures, but again,
if cancer treatment was banned, you would NOT say that cancer sufferers have lost the right to their body! Because that would be stupid, and you're not stupid.

 

Know what "context" means ?

I didn't think so.

 

Who is threatening to ban cancer treatment?


Ya, if all cancer treatments are banned then cancer victims seem to have lost the right to have medical care...



However, I don't care....I only care that women retain the right to their own bodies by not having abortion banned...

 

So your milk reference is in an okay context but mine isn't?

 

But they've not lost the right to their bodies?

 

DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, because it was a BORN child who has rights...

 

Looks that way.....but I'll worry about it when some weird person tries to ban cancer treatments.

 

Exactly. So that's what we call a DOUBLE STANDARD.

 

Why would that change how much someone is affected on a "personal level?"

 

What "double standard"....if cancer patients are denied care that is taking away their right to their own body.....do you know any insane weirdos who want to do that?

See, that's why this is the Abortion Forum....because weirdos trying to take away cancer victims rights are not an issue.

 

Because if murder was allowed/legal society would quickly devolve into chaos...it would affect everyone.

People who are not born affect no one.