How can homosexuality not be a perversion?

Yeah I don't think it's too much to ask for people to try and get along especially if they felt like marrying each other if it was a little harder to divorce it would probably be a lot less common she divorced families. The only way it'll ever be fixed is if there is skin in the game

 

I actually did make an argument. The definition of marriage is the union of two people. Nowhere is it stipulated every married couple MUST have children. Lots of married hetero couples don’t have children.

 

And the purpose of this union is (or rather was) to start a family. The state did not intervene in the intimate relationship between a man and a women just for the hell of it. It wanted to safeguard and nurture future generations.



That lots of married hetero couples don't have children is just another aspect of the breakdown of society.

 

infertility is now linked to the breakdown of society?

Purpose of a union also includes companionship and love for each other.

 

Yup isn’t it awful that we allow interracial marriage now. We sure are devolving.

 

Spoken like a true extremist......(marrying a duck)

 

Why is not having children and aspect of breaking down of society? Is that your sole purpose?Yeah we have such a problem with under population don’t we?

 

No, it's protected apart from minority status.

 

I think that is a reasonable distinction.

 

Any people who choose to live together should be able to registered for the legal benefits ascribed to married couples.

Then there should be marriage, completely separated from anything related to government.

 

So is equating two men permanently shacking up to a man marrying a woman.

Yeah, people who didn't like it had to make it illegal, because everybody knew it was still marriage. OTOH, there's no more need to make "gay marriage" illegal than there is to criminalize flapping your arms and flying to the Moon.

Yes, a ruling it had no legal authority to make.

Like you give a damn about that.

Of course there is. That he gives his imprimatur to a glaring imbecility of his own accord rather than under the gov't gun hardly makes it legitimate.

 

For some maybe. For many others not so much. For many the purpose of getting married is to spend the rest of their life with someone they have fallen in love with.

 

You do not want to see the difference because it is convenient to receive government benefits with Zero responsibility.
Once again, in case of undesired procreation both man and woman is equally responsible for their child.
It is not the case with homosexual couple where in case of undesired procreation only one partner is responsible.

 

Read my post and you will get it. Or educate yourself you might need it one day.

 

Which has nothing to do with marital benefits.

 

Apparently we do, according to those who wish to liberalize immigration laws.

 

Yea, exactly that is why marriage benefits has nothing to do with gay sex. I have said it many times.
If marriage is about sex, then all types of sex relationship should be covered by the government, not only gay sex.
Currently it is not the case.

 

One could do that without intervention from the state. Laws around marriage focus on protecting the family which includes children.

 

Which is everything has to do who gets those benefits.
Gay sex is a private matter, so government should not be involved with gay sex.
Heterosexual relationship is a public matter since it can lead to procreation.
Procreation need to be protected by the government.
That is all.

 

It's even sadder to see that there are those who cannot accommodate such differences in opinion. Tolerance is not a one way street.

 

And those who 'despise' miscegenation are entitled to feel that way. We may not agree, but as long as laws reflect equality, we should support their right to hold a different opinion, and to speak on it.

"In the past" is anyone who would silence those with whom they disagree.

 

Are you joking, here?

There is nothing 'normal' (statistically) about a stable and long term marriage.

 

Except that the state gives marital benefits with no stipulation that married couples MUST have kids

 

The govt isn’t involved in gay sex. Odd you think it is.

 

But with assumption that heterosexual couple might have kids.
They still 100% responsible for procreation, unlike homosexual couples.