Hillary Clinton attacks Tulsi Gabbard "Russian 3rd Party Candidate"

ALREADY POSTED.

http://politicalforum.com/index.php...d-for-third-party-run.563131/#post-1071077403

Long Before Your Post.

Have you ever even TRIED to use the Search Function to avoid Redundant Threads?

(In future you may want to familiarize yourself with the Search Function).

^Nothing personal, just a helpful suggestion to avoid REDUNDANCY.

Anyway, here is my INPUT in the Original Thread:

Tulsi WON'T do it.

The REAL Thing that needs to happen is THIS:

A Well-Financed GOP "True Conservative" Alternative (that can siphon votes from Trump).

Anyway, even though there is ZERO Chance that Tulsi will bite...

...That was a MORONIC thing for Hillary to say...

Hillary seems to developing a Senile Tinfoil Hat...:smh:

___________

You're Welcome.

PS--Don't forget about that Search Function (so you can avoid SPAMMING the board with REDUNDANT Threads). Making a habit of that isn't a good look.

Thx in advance.

 

Lying Hillary is doing her usual lying smear job against a superior candidate. Maybe she will claim that Gabbard is related to Putin. I will dance in the street if she croaks before I do.

 

Hillary might be running this time around-maybe this was just one way to smear the best chance Dems have.

 

Kind of like how the A-Bomb was "the best chance" that Japan had in WW2?

Got it.

 

It was pretty sad. I fell asleep during most of it. Not even a good clown show. I attribute its failure to CNN and their awful moderators even though the characters and acting was terrible.

 

Kind of like how you thought Hillary in a land slide in 2016.

 

Oh my God, I love this woman.



I seriously think she would give Trump a run for his money. Too bad the Dems are going to destroy her for going after their lich queen.

 

True.

6 Billion People were wrong about 2016 (and I was one of them).

On the other hand, like some people (in the light of Hillary's Loss), I still haven't found it necessary to sit here for the last 3 years SPAMMING Breitbart Memes (across Multiple Threads) several times a day.

^So, there's that.

As far as Tulsi:

She is only 38 and will be viable for the Next 20 Years.

 

You beat me to it!

Gabbard is of course correct.

 

She's viable now, no need to wait. I think she would beat trump, probably soundly. You can't say that about any other dem in the field ATM.

Look, she polls very well with independents. She won't swing ANY votes to trump that weren't going to vote for him anyway. She would win. Bigly.

 

Poor Little Tulsi...

Just MORE Pathetic Attention-Whoring (to get a few Retweets from the RW Fever Swamp)...

NOT a Good Look...

She is Pretty HOT...

That Said:

I still can't figure out WHY she hasn't got that Hideous "Gummy Smile" corrected?




Tulsi 2028/2032/Etc...

 

It is true that the early polls showed Hillary winning in a landslide. However, the final polls showed Hillary winning by only 2%, with a 2% margin of error. Comey's notification that the FBI had found emails on Weiner's laptop cost her the Presidency. The polls also reflect the popular vote and nothing else.

 

Dems don't care about any of that. They are determined to lose.

 

She's completely correct, and she's completely finished.

Best case scenario- the Dems kick her out of the clown car, she goes third party in revenge, and siphons votes away from the Dem frontrunner.

Oh, that would be marvelous.

 

Tulsi's worn the uniform of this nation and served us under enemy fire. I may not agree with her, but I'll damn sure listen respectfully when she speaks. As for Hillary, her brain seems to be progressively more pickled.

And what the hell is she wearing?

 

It certainly seems that way.

 

Word

 

In 20 years your party will be full Communist.

 

Really?

Will you STILL be here "In 20 years" to back that up?

Sounds like a FUN Game, though.

Can I Play?

In 20 Years the New York Yankees will be a Girls Softball Team.

I guess that NEITHER of Us will Know for 20 Years?

Cool. Be there or Be Square.

It's a Date! 10/18/2038...

 

Wow the partisan lines a drawn clear. Much thicker than the lines obama drew against russia or the reset button hillary clicked. Let alone uranium 1. In to tulsi because she has a brain.

 

That ISN'T "Racist".

A lot of "Nationalities" have "Gummy Smiles" (just ask Katie Couric).

Calling me "Racist" is a Personal Insult (and Trolling).:smh:

 

Perfect-world scenario:

The Dem's turn on Tulsi, and throw her out of the clown car. Then, in revenge, Tulsi runs third party, siphons votes away from the Dem candidate, and that hands Trump a massive bigly WIN.

Tulsi becomes a despised pariah to the Dems. Trump laughs and hands her the National Security Advisor position, and she promptly runs rampant with her anti-war agenda, and yanks every last US troop out of the Middle East.

The Dems then explode in a supernova of rage and despair.

 

We already have a great team with Trump/Pence, but if we didn't Tulsi would be a great choice.

HILLARY CALLS TULSI GABBARD A RUSSIAN TOOL, AND TULSI GABBARD ISN’T SITTING STILL FOR IT:



And it just gets better from there. But I love this comment by a Hillary defender and the response:





Tulsi Gabbard is the only one in the Democratic field who would take on Trump effectively, and this response shows why.

 

She attacked Jill Stein as well-the implication from Hillary is any third party or non DNC approved candidate will be blackballed for good.

Democrats seem to watch all of this passively.

Very odd.

 

Well, she is not batcrap crazy, so she lacks the qualifications of the DNC.