Pence chief of staff fires back at Sondland: That conversation never happened...

Such is the dem clown show narrative with zero proof.

 

Pence ............ although a screw up as governor .......... is a good soldier to Herr Trump

Cadre of Liars ............ all of Trumps men

 

You accept unsworn hearsay evidence over a sworn first hand account.
There is a name for what afflicts you: confirmation bias.

 

Yah they are lying by saying what trump asked for in the call, is what he wanted lol

 

The transcript of the phone call by Trump is proving everything. The testimonies around it all confirm it. I haven't heard anybody saying differently under oath.

 

Of course you haven’t heard anything different under oath. All have said they heard nothing directly, except Sondland, and assumed. The only direct qoute was Trump saying is ‘I want nothing’.

You heard no quid quo pro on the call either.

 

Sondland never claimed Pence was the one who raised the issue, nor did he claim the Bidens were mentioned by name. Why are they denying something that was never claimed?

 

No one else directly saw Clinton's escapades either. Trump saying "I want nothing, there is no quid pro quo" is like Clinton saying "I did not have sexual relations with that woman!" Nobody believes him, but his hardcore supporters defend him until the end anyway.

 

Well, except for the direct evidence against Clinton you might have something.

 

We got what was directly said by Trump is on transcript.
And that is not what he later said when busted and not under oath.
Do you understand?

 

So you imagined a quid pro quo with no quid pro quo ever evident. Fascinating.

 

If you go try and bribe a cop, than you might find out that your cellmate Bubba is imagining you're his wife in the following week. "Fascinating"

 

Wow, you actually came up with that all by yourself? Your intellect is stunning. LOL

 

Not so surprised you're not commenting on how illegal it is.

 

Not comment on something irrelevant? Go figure.

 

bribing is not irrelevant. It's the topic. And I'm not hearing any peep from you how it's legal.

 

One would need evidence and also understand what bribing means.

 

I already noted that the transcript of Trump shows he was bribing a foreign leader. We got testimony after testimony under oath saying it really was like that. It's up to you to debunk it.

 

Only in the minds of the sufferers.

 

neah. Transcript is real, just like the testimonies under oath.

 

You mean the no quid pro quo transcript? Familiar with the English language?

 

You mean the transcript where Trump explicitly asked for favors while holding back the aid? lol

 

Ukraine would have to be aware there was a quid pro quo to have a quid pro quo. FAIL for the dem clown show.

 

I asked you to debunk things, not just chat me to absolute boredom.