Big Coal Predicted Climate Change...In 1966

What evidence do you need? I have the funds to give one a scientific experiment to Antarctic

 

Of course it does. If you were an actual student of climate science you would not make such a false statement.

 

I've been asking for it. But, except for about 2 papers that downplay it a little bit, there doesn't seem to be any evidence, just political hackery.

 

But, no ability to provide any scientific evidence.

 

More like break the ice, used to play it with my daughter

 

Are you that helpless. People have been providing book titles and papers throughout this thread. Why is it everyone else’s job to provide the material ??? You claim to be smarter that everyone else but show no initiative or curiosity.

 

Of what some Nigerian weather men or ones expert a crazy kid from Australia named John Cook and his asinine 97% and blog skeptical science?

 

They have been providing political books with sciency sounding stories in which they can say whatever they want because there is no review or accountability. I have been provided exactly one actual paper that claims the sun is a little more responsible than the accepted level. However, I found over a dozen disputing that claim.

 

see?

 

He does have a big head, I always thought he was like 70 years old but damn he still has zits it appears he never got laid and people are using cook as a source how embarrassing

 

Lol, also deniers: "Why don't you take our evidence as seriously as the scientific evidence?"

 

See what?

This has to be the most ridiculous source in history a child from Australia, his stupid blogs of skeptical science.


People got conned

 

What deniers? We use actual adults the alarmists use children as sources

 

That look retarded as hell

 

Do you see skeptical science, Cook science is based on crap? Going to hammer it home

 

I I appoloze I really do but sourcing a child who produces a blog from Australia saying 97% of scientist is ridiculous and ludicrous

Once again the famous scientist John Cook

(Told ya I would go for the kill)

This is the child Obama respected and parroted his 97% comment on

 

But yet, you don't feel the ability to provide any evidence from actual experts, and verified by actual experts to support anything other than the scientific consensus. I mean even if there were hundreds of actual experts publishing hundreds of papers of actual science it still wouldn't be a believable hypothesis. But as it stands, there are thousands of papers and scientists that agree with the consensus.... and apparently just one who is kind of lukewarm on it (don't get me wrong, I know there are more... somewhere around a couple percent of them it seems). It would seem like all of these people writing all of these stories you read could be better spending their time doing actual science don't you think?

 

That is a vital book. I will check into it.

 

Browse: Home / 2019 / November / 25 / New Study: 6500 Years Ago The Western Barents Sea Was Ice-Free And 10°C Warmer Than 2015
New Study: 6500 Years Ago The Western Barents Sea Was Ice-Free And 10°C Warmer Than 2015
By Kenneth Richard on 25. November 2019

Share this...

The Arctic’s western Barents Sea (Storfjordrenna) surface temperatures now range between 2-4°C. Sea ice persists in the region for 10 months of the year. A new study finds this same region was sea ice-free, 10°C warmer than today (13°C), and SSTs rapidly rose and fell by degrees C per century during the mid-Holocene.
The western Barents Sea surface temperatures oscillated around 3°C in 2015 according to a new study (Łacka et al., 2019).
https://notrickszone.com/2019/11/25...ts-sea-was-ice-free-and-10c-warmer-than-2015/

 

He is one of the researchers yes and the “blog” you decry is evidenced based (know what that means) validated has won awards (eureka award) and has partnered with UQ.

Cook himself is an evangelical Christian with a degree in solar physics

 

Didn’t read the original article did you? There is a lot more to a regional temperature rise than you assume

 

Really?

Got an example for me?

 

Don’t bother it has been debunked

 

Since you’ve seen it all before let’s see if you can figure this one out. Here’s a piece you will like. It fits what you want to believe.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ca...eds-of-millions-into-malnutrition-by-2050/amp

Let’s see if you can spot what I would cite as erroneous conclusions even though most of the science is sound. I’ll even help you out a little to get you started. Focus on appeal to emotion claims about India.

For now we will skip the glaring factual errors in the article. Just focus on the premise. I’m willing to help if you get stuck. Remember, I’m not politically motivated, I just want people to think about what they are “fed” on this issue.

 

The respect is mutual. I’m seriously asking if I’m in error on my summation of current theory.