Australia arrests 183 for setting bushfires that celebrities claim were caused by climate change

Discussion in 'Australia, NZ, Pacific' started by ArchStanton, Jan 7, 2020.

  1. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just all of the evidence.
     
    Sallyally likes this.
  2. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You have provided no evidence. And, you have provided no evidence that peer review is meaningless. You provided a logo. You can see how that isn't convincing can't you?
     
  3. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,674
    Likes Received:
    8,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How would you know ?? You have self admitted that you know nothing about science. And nobody is arguing that global warming is not occurring.
     
  4. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,674
    Likes Received:
    8,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The us no causation evidence, only correlation.
     
  5. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I never said I know nothing about science. I said neither one of us knows much of anything about climate science.
     
  6. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    45,102
    Likes Received:
    12,572
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, let's see--they won back the House even with massive Republican gerrymandering. They're in position to take back the White House unless they blow it by nominating Sanders or Warren.
     
  7. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,674
    Likes Received:
    8,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    MBH98 and MBH99. Both were peer reviewed. Both were shown to be bogus.
     
  8. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Except you have no idea.
     
  9. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,674
    Likes Received:
    8,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I know a lot about climate science.
     
  10. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,674
    Likes Received:
    8,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have an informed opinion.
     
  11. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, they never were. Lol, the ipcc provided massive amounts of data, and expert analysis done by tons of actual experts. Your counter argument was... a logo.
     
    Sallyally likes this.
  12. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, you don't. You have exactly what I described in my discussion of pseudo-science. You are exactly as informed as the person who thinks quantum mechanics lets them materialize objects with their mind.
     
  13. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,674
    Likes Received:
    8,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So what. The blue wave never happened. Actually winning back the House has been a negative. Nothing worked on except impeachment.
     
  14. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,674
    Likes Received:
    8,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They absolutely were. Again you lack knowledge. The IPCC dropped the hockey stick.
     
  15. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,674
    Likes Received:
    8,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Cannot make this up. ^^^^
     
    ArchStanton likes this.
  16. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, they didn't even if they did, that still would be one point for your conclusion 186,000 for the consensus.
     
  17. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Which means you know I'm right.
     
  18. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    45,102
    Likes Received:
    12,572
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Indeed. Google turns this up...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iceni
     
  19. Etbauer

    Etbauer Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I can articulate the difference between my view and other pseudoscience. Can you?
     
  20. ArchStanton

    ArchStanton Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2018
    Messages:
    3,230
    Likes Received:
    4,053
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Garbage in, garbage out. I remember when the science was once settled....but that didn't work out for the nutters.

     
    AFM likes this.
  21. Montegriffo

    Montegriffo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2017
    Messages:
    10,682
    Likes Received:
    8,954
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I live in Suffolk near the Norfolk border and my avatar pic is Boudica, a flame-haired warrior queen who was born just down the road from a Romano-Iceni settlement near Caister St Edmonds in South Norfolk.

    For those with a very poor knowledge of history and who are too lazy to follow links, Boudica led the Iceni revolt which came very close to kicking the Romans out of Britain (the one from the revolt in 60-61 AD not my cat).
     
    Sallyally likes this.
  22. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,674
    Likes Received:
    8,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There is that confirmation bias again. It's obvious that you are not interested challenging your beliefs and there is nothing I can do about that. So over and out.
     
  23. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    45,102
    Likes Received:
    12,572
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    A good bet: we are.

    [​IMG]

    https://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/last_400000_years.png
     
    Bowerbird likes this.
  24. Caligula

    Caligula Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,877
    Likes Received:
    805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Australia NSW police say they "take legal action against more than 180 people so far during 2019/2020 bushfire season."
    Among those are
    - 24 people have been charged over alleged deliberately-lit bushfires
    - 53 people have had legal actions for allegedly failing to comply with a total fire ban, and
    - 47 people have had legal actions for allegedly discarding a lighted cigarette or match on land.

    https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/news/...vdi5hdSUyRm1lZGlhJTJGODIyNjQuaHRtbCZhbGw9MQ==

    Another source.
    Since November, authorities in NSW have charged or cautioned 183 people for some 200 bushfire-related offences – malicious and otherwise. Of those, 24 people have been charged with deliberately lighting bushfires. Another 53 were charged or cautioned for failing to comply with a total fire ban and another 47 with discarding a lit cigarette.
    https://www.news.com.au/national/cr...s/news-story/be73567276fcbb39b8e7f58bf79268cb


    The claim that 183 people were arrested for arson/setting bushfires is obviously false, the police in Aus should know. Looks very much like deliberately distorted facts.
     
    Sallyally and Bowerbird like this.
  25. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Then why would someone ask for clarification about what non-anthropogenic climate is
     

Share This Page