Exactly - Thank you - and the District Judge in the DNC vs Russia , Trump and affiliates case - stated that this would not be a crime - is covered under the first amendment. Some Russian phones Trump - during the election campaign - says "we have dirt on Hillary " should we release it - how is Trump supposed to respond. 1) Do what you like ... nudge nudge wink wink 2) NO NO - Don't let the voter know the dirty deeds of a candidate prior to the election. 3) Please do release it - it is my patriotic duty to help the voter know "The Truth" about a candidate prior to the election. I don't want a Kangaroo court - and I want the Rule of Law and founding principles upheld. A special prosecutor is allowed to break those rules - and thus the bar must be high - and specific only to things directly related. That bar is high .. serious National Security Risk - Martial Law - and so on.. On that basis you may break the rules - not to investigate how many inches of Cigar that Slick Willy inserted into Monica's oval orifice - or Maniforts tax fraud a decade prior. That is what separates legitimate authority from illegitimate abuse of authority. The sentence of Stone is appalling - his lawyers stated that the norm was 24-36 months. The FBI actions were appalling - lying their way through the FISA system on a wild goose chase that they knew would not stand up in court - and somehow Golden Showers got into the mix. Then we had the CIA try to frame Papadopolous - Dubious So what was this National Security Risk .. That Trump helped Russia to do the Hack - or aided the FB ad folks. That is your investigation - as per same Judge as above - and they knew right away that Trump had nothing to do with either - and that the other stuff they were chasing was Legal - even if barely so.
There is no shortage of the wish-fulfillment self-indulgent divining entrails to pleasure themselves in this manner, and such caprices are quite harmless, unless clung to with fanatical ferocity. It would behoove the P-Grabber's true believers to temper their zeal with rationality, and accept the uncertainty.
Entirely possible. Bernie could lose, but the Democrats could take Congress. Both sides would have something to crow about.
Let's make it SIX reasons. Ronald Reagan asked America a simple question in 1980 and it won him the election. Here is todays answer to his question: Nearly 60% of Americans say they're better off financially than a year ago https://www.cbsnews.com/news/nearly...heyre-better-off-financially-than-a-year-ago/ Americans may not be quite ready to party like it's 1999, but that's the last time they felt as optimistic about their finances as they do now. Nearly six in 10 Americans, or 59%, say they are better off financially today than a year ago, according to a new Gallup poll. That's in line with the annual national mood check's highest prior reading in January 1999.
To begin with St Reagan was essentially blaming Carter for what the Fed was doing to strangle the economy. Carter was trounced for presiding over a BAD economy. McCain was trounced because the Bush/Cheney WRECKED the economy in 2008 and he PANICKED! Your criminal IMPOTUS is only responsible for changing ONE aspect of the current economy and that is the DEFICIT. It has BALLOONED under his FISCAL MALFEASANCE for no sound reason. The problem with TODAY'S economic booms compared to those of the past is that it is NOT a "rising tide that lifts all boats" such as the one that occurred under Clinton. Instead it is economy that is GRINDING UNDER hardworking Americans and they are NOT seeing any of the benefits in their bank accounts. ONLY if you are in the TOP 20% you are doing better. Everyone else is either treading water or sinking. So adding a 6th reason like this FALLS APART when examined critically.
And rightly so. Carter was an imbecile. The rest of your post is garbage. Thank you President Trump for a booming economy and the lowest unemployment in 50 years! 6 in 10 Americans say they are better off now than three years ago: Gallup https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...cans-say-they-are-better-off-than-three-years A majority of Americans in a new poll say they are better off now than they were three years ago. Just more than 6 in 10 Americans, 61 percent, told Gallup pollsters that they are decidedly in better shape than they were shortly after President Trump took office in 2017, a sign of a recovering U.S. economy.
I see you continue to post in this thread, yet have failed to address the weaknesses I pointed out in using the 3 models provided by you as evidence that Trump will win in 2020. This is the same point you felt was so convincing that it needed to be presented on the very first post of this thread. If you are unable to address or acknowledge the issues pointed out, then I see no reason why you should expect anyone else consider your later points.
per usual here is the challenge. Find one economic metric ( look up the meaning) that has changed either slope or direction since Trump took fire excluding the deficit and the national debt of course.
so all that actually proves is a year ago Trump was an economic disaster. The actual question should be are you better off than you were in 2016.
Easy. Find one single one of your example that Trump did by his endless executive decrees. The only real result of the Trump administration is the Rise of Russian power and the decline of America’s influence in the world. And now we have word that Trump was going to pardon Assange if Assange would lie and say Russia had nothing to do with the Wikileaks. And the evidence that Trump is a Russian stooge just keeps building.
Big "if" though. I honestly think Trump's % of racial minorities, especially black people will be way up this time around. 2 messages are getting out: 1: Black people are doing better than ever under Trump and 2: Black people. The Democratic party is taking advantage of you. Leave them for a party that is putting money and opportunity into your lives. We'll see.
You may be right that he'll increase his percentage of the minority vote. I would even say that's likely. However will it be enough to counter the overall demographic trend and the likely increased turnout? Last time around, turnout was depressed because...Hillary, plus no one thought Trump could win anyway. That won't be the case for round two.
Trump's detractors will be more motivated this time. With legacy media telling Hillary supporters she had a 98.5% likelihood of winning, they stayed home. Why bother going out? She's going to win anyway! But the party is split. Moderates won't vote Bernie. Bernie's won't vote Bloomberg. And they told the electorate that if Trump wins 2016, expect WW3 and crashed economy. That hasn't happened.
Since you have yet to post one thing Trump has done to hurt Russia you are done. But then Trump supporters always have a problem providing facts to support their claims. Usually they just duck and pretend that it is someone else’s job to debunk their lies since they are unable to actually support their statements.
Had nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that Trump has done nothing to actually improve the economy. Of course he did do the massive corporate rich person tax cut which was supposed to bring manufacturing back to America and result in a 4% GDP growth. Neither of which happened .
If you choose to remain this uninformed, it's on you. Economy And Jobs | President Donald J. Trump's ... www.promiseskept.com › achievement › overview › economy-and-jobs Economy And Jobs. President Donald J. Trump Achievements ... President Trump is unleashing economic growth and jobs. Since his election, the Trump ...
I think the Democrats will unite behind anyone if they think they can take out Trump. So I'm not sure Bernie Bros will stay home. Most of them voted for Hillary.
No...I posted several of them. You just denied that Trump did them. It's pointless for me to waste time trying to convince you of something that no fact and no data will convince you of.