St. Louis couple charged for pulling guns at protest

You said that you wanted some evidence that the spring was installed backwards. I gave you that evidence. Did you also note that for the law that she's being charged with that the weapon had to be operable at the time of the incident? It clearly wasn't if they had to disassemble and reassemble it to get it to work. You do not need a jury to know whether X law applies to a situation or not. A DA chooses the charges. Not a jury. A jury decides on the charges presented to it. And last I knew evidence is to be presented exactly how it was retrieved. Changing it and then presenting it is not allowed.

As for your scenario, 1: you'd have to prove that they flipped the spring after the fact, something the prosecutor can't prove one way or another but the McClowskies can prove was done prior to the event. 2: you'd also have to explain why they didn't do the same for the other gun, ya know, being skilled litigators and already knew how to do such.

 

That was very inappropriate of the mayor. Whether it was necessary or not, and I don’t know, they were within their rights.

 

LOL

You ladies are consistent. I'll give you that.

 

I guess the NRA now have their Roe vs Wade moment?

 

Urination competition?

 

this wasn’t a protest. this was a group of criminals that has destroyed a gate and were trespassing. The fact this dem DA charged them is a loss for our republic and an abuse of power. When you side with terrorist you are the terrorist

 

Mark and Patricia McCloskey are the terrorists in this case.

 

for many left wingers that’s the case...hence why they destroyed their gate and invaded their property.

Leftwingers see property owners as terrorist...it’s sad. but leftwingers have done it for centuries

 

Their PRIVATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATION.

Of course it is when it is done by the criminal mob that has been burning and looting other parts of the city.

I have a theory for you, the guns worked.

 

Koreans aren't white so it's actually yellow privilege, or hard working privilege but definitely not white privilege.

 

Nope. You do jot have to acknowledge any guilt to accept a pardon and a pardon can be issued because the issuer does jot believe the guilty verdict and that it was an injustice.

 

Always. But this couple didn't break any laws.

 

The terrorist homeowners did not know the gate was damaged.

 

Law enforcement and DA believes otherwise.

 

a DA who should be tossed out, and who already has a long established pattern of abuse of power.

She's obviously heavily biased on the side of BLM protesters.

 

The same district attorney that has an eighty percent failure rate on achieving convictions?

 

Oh? Then how did that mob get in?

Some of those women in that crowd are so fat they definitely couldn't have climbed over.

 

Corrupt, Fat Billy Barr is far worse.

 

A claim that cannot actually be proven on the part of yourself.

 

Divine intervention?

 

I am not charged with felonies. I don't have to defend my innocence.

 

60+% of Americans couldn't climb over their spouse.

 

Has the phrase "malicious prosecution" ever been heard on the part of yourself? Or is such a notion simply too incomprehensible to be contemplated as being a realistic possibility?

 

Fat Billy Barr?

 

so? it was their house your gang invaded