Kamala Harris says the riots are not going to stop

Did ya catch Madcow's interview with Durkan?

Streicher couldn't have given a bigger reacharound to Hitler.

 

Let's see you find just one lie in any of her last, say, 2 months of transcripts. Make it more than just your skewed personal opinion, warped by RW propaganda. See post 23.

 

How is talking about protests condoning riots?

 

To be fair here, She was referring to people who were protecting citizens when she mentioned "vigilantes and extremists". Contextually, she's complaining that anyone be able to protect the citizens and communities that are being torn apart by the folks she is protecting here, the violent protesters. deflecting from that is just that, deflecting. And when MSM forget the quote, and just report, Harris said she was against violence, it doesn't contain the context of what she meant, just a very small slice of what she said.

In her mind, the "path to justice" means more protests, not less. More violence, not less. As long as it is the kind of violence she supports, which is ignoring the looting and rioting and arson her protesters are committing.

 

Let me get this straight. If the left gripes about Nazi rallies and counter-protests them, the right accuses the left of wanting to end free speech. But if the left says the peaceful protesting should continue and WILL continue, the right doesn't see the protests as proper exercise of the right to free speech.

Question for you: do you see no hypocrisy in that?

BTW, your parroted "Fox lies" about Biden are just that.

 

AOC/Biden... I mean Biden/Kamala has literally stolen Saul Alinnky's Rules for Radicals agenda. The economy and ethnic turmoil can elicit the changes the radical left have been trying to accomplish for the last 50+ years.

Over 30 people killed a hundreds of businesses burnt to the ground is not anecdotal. However, I do agree that they should be arrested and all looting should come to an end. I'm 100% in support of peaceful protest!

Anyone that puts Rachel Maddow as a reliable is nothing more than blowing smoke. Seriously, Randy Maddow is the left's doppelganger of Sean Hannity! They are both opinion voice boxes for their political party, nothing more.

 

You must have missed the "path to justice' reference. Fear not, lots of us didn't miss it. She does, actively support these looters, rioters, and arsonists. She hasn't ONCE gone on record calling for the end to violence, unless it's those who would thwart her minions, which she cast as "vigilantes and extremists". That two you've missed. Why do you support the woman who promotes the violence?

 

Slow Joe and Quid Blow Ho to the rescue!!!

 

What was she referring to with the word “they” — protests or riots — as it seems you accidentally left it out of your narrative.

 

I think you are confusing Trump with Obama who promoted violence against the police...

 

Because riots are happening during the protest... Simple math. If she wanted to segregate and differentiate from protest and riots, she should have.

 

HOLY CRAP! I listened to it. THAT is a gross spin that turns the whole thing on its head! There is no way in hell Harris would ever say what you claimed.

 

You poor dear, suffering from such irrational fears and conspiracy theories! Realize it's all in your head, dear!

Try putting some facts and data behind that unfounded opinion of Rachel. "Show me the money!" Find a lie she told and prove it's a lie with data. See post 23.

 

Watch Rachel Maddow.

 

And yet, there it is. Explained to you in living color. Cite ONE quote from her that suggests that the violence in Portland, or Seattle, or Chicago, or anywhere else the BLMs ANTIFA folks are destroying the cities she is against. ONE. You know better. There aren't any. Ask why that is. Why does't Harris call for an end to those folks? The answer is, she won't. Why? Because she believes this is their "path to justice" WTF that means to her. You know what is really sad? That airhead Colbert was too afraid to ask her to actually commit to her non support of the violence the BLM and ANTIFA folks have perpetrated. And instead, allowed her to crank her wheel of hate attacking folks who are simply trying not to be destroyed by the mob she supports. It really is that simple.

 

I do. ... Every day. And I notice a complete ABSENCE of any factual objections to her from you and the rest of the RWers here.

 

Wow. You have a very, neat, pre-packaged line of pure horsepucky on this whole thing. Just to THINK that anyone of her experience and integrity would approve of violence we see in the protests is beyond nuts. Add the that the contrived fantasy that Colbert was "afraid" and we have the makings of a psycho case and THAT is what you're getting from RW media..... AND YOU BELIEVE IT!!!!

OH! EDIT!!
You said "Colbert was too afraid to ask her to actually commit to her non support of the violence the BLM and ANTIFA folks have perpetrated."

So you're saying here that she does not support "the violence the BLM and ANTIFA folks have perpetrated."

It seems you're too confused by your own confusion to compose a sentence that is consistent with what you're trying to say, and in the process you inadvertently told the truth.

Have the last word. I'm done with this whole ridiculous line of crap.

 

LOL.. Sorry that was exceptionally funny. And yes, i think she very much approves of the violence. I don't have to "believe" that. Her lack of public condemnation speaks volumes for her. If she came out tomorrow, or today with a CLEAR condemnation of the Violence, specific with examples, like the looting and the rioting, and the destruction of public and private property, and ASSURED the nation that those behaviors would't be tolerated in her administration? That would be necessary for me to describe her as being anti violence at this point. She literally has had MONTHS to make this statement, and yet, none. The absence of a thing has an effect. It creates the environment that she herself has called the "path to justice". What all is included as part of that path.

Frankly, your naiveté here is pretty apparent. Oh, and FYI? I don't consume RW media. I don't need anyone telling me what to think. I can determine just as quickly when it's NPR, or MSNBC, or FOX when and what their spin on stuff is. It's apparent. On Harris specifically, does she have integrity? When she was having an affair with the married leader of the CA democratic party, is that "integrity". Is her "experience" locking up minorities in her state, the experience you're referring to? Hard to say. She definitely wasn't above spinning all kinds of libelous and slanderous attacks against many of the current administration nominees. So we know she enjoys slinging mud. Perhaps that is the experience you're referring to.

But sure. Look for Harris, any day now, to deliver the condemnation you know will never come.

 

She wasn’t asked about both, she was asked about protests.

 

Harris, a U.S. senator who previously served as California's attorney general, said she supported peaceful protesters.

"We should not confuse them with those looting and committing acts of violence, including the shooter who was arrested for murder. And make no mistake, we will not let these vigilantes and extremists derail the path to justice," Harris said in a speech from a university auditorium in Washington streamed online

 

The looting and rioting and constant protests are all part of DIRTY DONALD TRUMPS Making America Great Again....A LIVING NIGHTMARE!!!! This is EXACTLY WHAT TRUMP HAS GIVEN US ALL !!!! A LIVING NIGHTMARE !!!!

 

Well.... Steele dossier Russia hoax... Oh yeah, and her reliable "We got him now" when she released his taxes... That worked out well!

How about when she claimed that Anthony Barr was redacting the Mueller report on his own when her chyron clearly state that Barrs special counsel is assisting with redaction! I mean a blatant lie with the supporting evidence of the lie on her own show!



And where are these Putin tapes (golden showers much) that she continued to tell her audience about, but never produced 1 iota?

And even to this Day, Randy Maddow continues to say that Trump takes orders directly from Putin.. True journalism happening right there, considering there is zero evidence presented.

Maddow also suggested that ordered Trump to 'bleed out' the FBI with again, zero evidence.

The one I love most is Putin installed Rex Tillerson as Trump's secretary of state... That was a knee slapper!

 

Yep, summer of love we are having.

 

Most Americans see them one in the same as that what we see on the news Daily. Burning buildings, people violently being beaten and people screaming and people in their houses because they are gentrifying their neighborhoods.

 

Well screaming is definitely part of protesting, not rioting.
It’s protesting during the day, then the anarchist loons come out at night.