NV whistleblower describes Biden van vote factory in signed affidavit - Election Fraud

It was pretty extreme to impeach him. I know this is hindsight, but everyone knew that Bill liked them young and the fact that he was best friends with underage, sex slave island dude is just golden. I think I can agree with that being the first blow-up between the parties, but also that he and his wife are f###ed in the head.

 

Those were actually real news on the crimes of people in Trump's campaign, trying to cover up meetings with Russian agents that actually happened, etc. Not ridiculous statements from people with questionable backgrounds saying they think they saw something.

 

Who? Why is it that I can't meet with a Russian agent? Would it make a difference if it was a Mexican agent?

 

This isn't proof. And if it is, let it go before a judge and see how it goes.

 

Given that Obama stole the original concept from Mitt Romney, they already wrote most of it. And given that Obama made adjustments to the bill prior to the votes in both chambers to make it more friendly to conservatives in both parties, I would say you got everything you claim you wanted in the post above. But that's not what you're after. You want to win and get your way all the time. So sorry, that doesn't happen. You lost this election just like Obamacare was passed. The Supreme Court ruled per the law, in fact, it was your own Chief Justice who ruled in favor of the provision you are griping about. You just don't always get your way in life, and that's funny that so called conservatives need to be taught that lesson.

 

Exactly.

It will be laughed out of court.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...pa-election-challenge-dead-on-arrival.581089/

 

So just about ever American has a high quality video camera and not one of these whistleblowers could get their tale on tape?

 

You do know the conservatives on the Supreme Court agree with Trump on this issue? It was a 4-4 split as to whether it could be heard, and all the justices have written on the issue. These legal experts don't even appear to understand the most relevant issue. It's not whether mail-in ballots are constitutional. It's whether the PA Supreme Court has the authority to override the laws of the legislators in extending the time for mail-in ballots past election day. That's why the votes needed to be segregated per PA guidance. In Alito's order, the Secretary of state said she couldn't verify that this was happening, and alleged that county officials thought they didn't have comply with the guidance. I don't know why these legal experts are having so much difficulty with these issues.

 

Yes. Russian agents were actively hacking political parties and politicians in the US, as well as actively trying to recruit assets.

Now clandestine meetings with foreign intelligence agents from any country is troubling, dealing with an antagonistic country like Russia is a much bigger issue.

 

I love your conspiratorial tone. It's like you think you're on to something, but there's a reasonable explanation. They aren't allowed to have or use a video camera or phone in the counting room. I guess we can put that one to rest.

 

At the time of Alito's second order the Sec of State had not gotten confirmation from 4 of the 60 something districts. Those came in a day later. Everyone complied. It is really moot as far as the election is concerned as those votes haven't been added to the totals yet.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-542/160045/20201108103715797_2020-11-08 - Letter to the Court.pdf

 

No. It's not a moot point.

That was 3 days after the election in the biggest Democrat counties. Not districts. They weren't segregating the votes, particularly the big dumps coming 12-36 hours after the election. The order states that those county officials didn't think it was binding on them. It's not compliance when you've already counted those ballots and added them to the main pile. It's done. They tainted the votes when they mixed the uncontested with the contested. They made it worse when they violated another court order from PA that required election officials to allow the observers to come closer so they could actively monitor the process.

Here's the order: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/110620zr_g31i.pdf

The problem is not that the Republicans have a bad case. It's that the Supreme Court is going to be reluctant to provide a proper remedy because it could be too severe.

 

A Transition team talking to other countries is normal it is not criminal. The election has not been called yet so there is no transition team yet officially.

 

Trump's campaign was having clandestine meetings during the campaign, well before the election.

 

There was nothing "clandestine" about the meetings.. FFS are you going to rehash this debunked **** all again all because your lovely "transition team" is behaving the same way Flynn did?

 

The SOS has been clear on many occasions. These ballots are not currently in the count.

 

As I posted above, none of what you said is true. All of the ballots received after the election were segregated and not added to the general vote tallies. Every county has certified that.

As for observers, all court order were followed.

 

Prove it. Someone says "I don't have to comply" 2 or 3 days later doesn't demonstrate that they are not in the count.

 

Manafort dropping off documents to a Russian agent in a department store isn't clandestine? The Trump Tower meeting was publicly announced?

 

I cited you the order. You're going to Justice Alito that they were segregated after telling him that some didn't think they had to comply with the PA guidance. Go ahead. Then tell him why you kicked Republicans out despite the PA court order.

 

There are certified affidavits from the state and every county.

 

To a large degree it always was fake news. It was fake before Trump ran for office.

 

We're going in circles. At this point its all about who each of us believes.

 

So what? It's just their word against their word.

 

You actually have to prove they didn't follow the order. So show us the votes that came in AREN'T segregated. And no observers were thrown out. In fact, Trump's own lawyers conceded they were always in the room.