NO evidence of nationwide election fraud!!

fake news

 

will you can think Republicans tried to steal the election from Biden, I just do not see it here

 

Facts = fake news. Liberal logic 101.

 

Not only did we commit fraud against ourselves, we didnt bother to rig the senate. How dumb of us.

 

Personally, I believe there are people on both sides willing to commit a bit of fraud. All the more reason to investigate.

 

Then why wont Rudy put them forth to the public? Why has EVERY SINGLE JUDGE laughed them out of court? Why has Trump won ZERO court cases?

 

I am not sure whether this is a lack of understanding or just an unwillingness to admit the facts.

For example, if you have a precinct with around 10,000 votes and it is expected that around 40% will be for Biden and 60% for Trump, and if all the votes are "misplaced", that means a net loss of 2000 votes for Trump.

Keep in mind this is just an fictional example showing that even though there is still a mix of votes, it can still have an influence.

 

Even if minor human error mistakes are made, its not going to add up to 140k votes.

 

yes, I heard Trump asked his voters to vote twice... crazy

 

lol, sure, keep trying to sell that bridge to nowhere

 

no evidence of cheating.. blah hahahahahah! You need to keep up.. now it's "yeah there was cheating.. but so little as to make a difference'
IT WAS A TRUMP LANDSIDE.. ALL THE CHEATER'S PREPARATION FOR STEALING THE VOTE WAS OVERWHELMED BY A TRUMP LANDSIDE!

 

Really? Here’s a few for ya...

A Georgia judge summarily dismissed a Trump campaign lawsuit last week that alleged ballots received after a 7 p.m. Election Day deadline were mixed in with legitimate ballots

Michigan:
This court finds that while there are assertions made by the plaintiffs that there is no evidence in support of those assertions," said Judge Timothy Kenny in denying a request to delay certification of election results.

Nevada: Rejected requests to stop machine verification, processing of mail ballots

In Nevada, another state Biden seems to have won by a fairly thin margin, Nevada Republicans filed a lawsuit that, had it been successful, would have slowed down the vote-counting process.

 

Reality is something Trump supporters have become expert at ignoring. The board being replete with evidence of such.

 

It's worse than you thought. Even democrats were concerned until this Nov 3rd.

 

Liberals: Trump is Hitler!

Also Liberals: There's zero evidence that any of us would break the law to keep Hitler from office.

 

Non sequitur...

 

Ipso facto

 

What makes you think none of the instances listed came about through thorough investigation? Where do you get the notion that they were "accidentally" found? Do you actually believe that this is the only election that ever warraned scrutiny?

None of the so-called investigations going on now have any basis in actual merit. There is no evidence to support the dozens of lawsuits file by Trump. None. Zero. Nada. Zilch.

Biden will be insugurated on Jan 20. You'll have to find a way to deal with it.

 

You can do better than that.

What you said was nonsense.

 

When you be better then I'll be better. My Latin is more applicable than yours, so I'll stick with that until you make an argument.

 

Lots of evidence. Blinders will not make that go away.

 

Your proposition was nonsense.
That the majority considered Trump an hitler wannabe doesn't mean that they had to cheat to get rid of him. All that they had to do, and what they exactly did, is vote for the other guy in a greater number.

 

Link, please, to some of that evidence.

 

Please put forth your evidence & argument that the majority considers Trump a Hitler wannabe. It's my position that that premise, even within the Democratic party, is a small but vocal minority with a fierce motive to perform illegal acts in the furtherance of that goal. Since you're willing to go so far as to say the majority considered Trump Hitler, that just strengthens my argument. Some Democrats had motive to commit fraud. Motive is evidence. Ipso facto there is evidence of fraud.

Of course, since the persuasive are attempting to assign your opinions to you, and persuasion requires equating evidence with proof, it's much easier to simplify the argument by saying there's no evidence.

 

Fraud implies intent. Intent to commit a felony. Not something people do for the fun of it.