Trump tops list of 2020's most admired men: Gallup poll

I've tried to convince you to have an honest discussion about this. You have repeatedly refused. If I try again, will you engage? I'd hate to think you were just trolling.

 

The fact that the DP rigs elections has been well established. Let me refresh your memory:

"1. The DP rigs its primaries and its nomination process. That is no longer a secret.

“Before I called Bernie Sanders, I lit a candle in my living room and put on some gospel music. I wanted to center myself for what I knew would be an emotional phone call. I had promised Bernie when I took the helm of the Democratic National Committee after the convention that I would get to the bottom of whether Hillary Clinton’s team had ***rigged*** the nomination process, as a cache of emails stolen by Russian hackers and posted online had suggested. I’d had my suspicions…”
POLITICO, Inside Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the DNC, When I was asked to run the Democratic Party after the Russians hacked our emails, I stumbled onto a shocking truth about the Clinton campaign., By DONNA BRAZILE November 02, 2017. (*** mine)
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774

 

So far you have not produced a single example of ad hominem used by me.

 

Stockholm Syndrome.

 

You are talking about party nominations. Not presidential elections. A party can assign whomever they wish as their candidate. Voting isn't even required for that.

 

So far you've done nothing but dodge and run away. We were talking about evidence-less conspiracy theories, not ad hominem attacks. I'd thank you for yet another white flag, but I'm afraid I've run out of places to store them.

 

I called out your use of ad hominem partisan attacks. How is that "trolling"?

 

I addressed your claim and tried to get you to join the topic. You have yet to engage.

 

LOL! So, you think a party that rigs its own primary elections would not rig an election against it's opposition?

 

I see.

 

I'm saying I'm intelligent and informed enough to know they aren't equivalent. [Insert emoji used to try to escape rational discussion]

 

That reminds me of the "little squid" described by the immortal Manuel Fidello.
Spewing ink cannot hide what you have and have not done on this thread.
Nice try though.

 

I've tried to get you to engage with my posts and with the topic. You have steadfastly refused. Every post from you has been ink. We're about to have another one in response to this post. Your next post will not address the topic, will not actually engage with any of my claims, etc. If you surprise me by being intellectually honest instead, great. If not, off to iggy.

 

IOW, even though you know that the DP rigs its own primaries and nomination process you think it would be above rigging elections against its partisan opposition. I doubt that you really believe that.

 

More evasion.

 

Joe Biden? Perhaps.

 

I doubt anyone with two brain cells to rub together would fall for such a fallacious argument. If you think you have evidence, encourage your folk to bring it court. There's a reason you have failed to do so.

 

I wish I had encountered anything from you except that. Even when I try to get you to engage with your own arguments, you run away, evade, and blame your evasion on others. Since you are either unwilling or unable to engage in honest discussion, off you go. Goodbye.

 

Yeah, patriotism minus the constitution......ok

 

1. Proof of your repeated use of ad hominem.
2. Proof that the DP does rig elections.

Response: more evasion.

 

Trump also won 100% of the dead voter votes.

MAGA #2020 aka Trump's Twitter password

 

No hearings = rigged election. It's not subtle.

 

LOL! If that was true the DP House would have held hearings and proved it in the week after the election.

 

Dredging up.Ancient History from 4 years Ago?

Here is the Bottom Line:

Clinton would have gotten the Dem. Nomination (regardless)

The only effect of those revelations was to get disgruntled Bernie People to throw the Election to Trump.

So glad to see all of those "Progressive" Dems get their dream candidate in the White House.

Also, between posts about ancient events in 2016 and postjng the definition of Ad Hominem several times, you seem to have veered pretty far off topic in a thread about a Gallup.Poll.

In any event, in an attempt to get this thread back to the actual OP topic, I really don't see why the poll is a big deal (either way).

The U.S. President (regardless of partly), usually has some support (even if it is a minuscule 18%) in these sort of polls.

 

People have been arrested. Why hasn't Newsmax or OANN reported it? Are they part of the deep state?