Anybody agree with my assumption?

I am in favor of looking into the security breach, the shooting of Babbitt and everything leading up to, during and after that debacle. I wish Trump, Guiliani, Bannon, Jordan, Hawley, The Proud sissies, The Oathbreakers and all of those involved had half the balls Hillary Clinton had when she voluntarily appeared and testified under oath for 10 hours on live TV before the Gowdy, Jordan, Issa committee and made them all look like a bunch of monkeys trying to fvck a football. These GOP sissies who refuse to answer for their actions or inaction have no balls, no honor and are a disgrace to this great country.

 

How about letting these guys get on the stand instead of Hillary and have their say...oh wait they can't... what difference does it make anyway? Hillary and Obama lied and people died...

 

Oathkeepers sound great...
Maybe they need to start with these guys to testify...

 

The left didn't accept the 2016 election results for four years, screaming Trump/Russian collusion on evidence that they manufactured themselves. If I remember correctly, the 2020 election was won by Biden, certified, and Biden has been president.

 

Let's try this again. Do you realize that even the House isn't investigating a coup?

 

Yes, the Emperor's New Clothes are simply stunning!

 

Now that's funny. It's also a pipe dream. Especially so since it's primary accomplishment is creating martyrs out of people whom you'd have been better of to fine heavily and let them disappear back into their much deserved annonimity.

 

what I wonder is how many non-democrats are really interested in the 1-6 hearings? I have a feeling that most independents have placed 1-6 into the ancient history category, much like the riots in Portland and Minneapolis. Independents also have placed Trump into that category if the Nov 3rd elections and the present overall approval of Biden and the democratic controlled congress along with the generic congressional ballot are any indication.

Overall, I do find it interesting that Trump overall favorability has improved from 37% favorable/59% unfavorable in January up to 41% favorable/52% unfavorable today.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/trump_favorableunfavorable-5493.html

That pretty well matches Biden's, 42% favorable/52% unfavorable today.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/biden_favorableunfavorable-6677.html

The thing here is Trump is history, at least to independents, he's no longer in charge, he's no longer president. Biden is.

As for independents view of these two, Question 42A, Biden, 37% favorable/60% unfavorable from independents. Trump, independents now view him 41% favorable/53% unfavorable, question 42G. As for independents view of the two major parties, Democratic Party, 25% favorable, 66% unfavorable, Republican Party 27% favprable, 67% unfavorable. Questions 43A and 43B.

https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/79n2jfbdep/econTabReport.pdf

I do think the Democrats are paying way too much attention to Trump and not enough attention to what independents think is the most important problem facing this nation. That will probably come back to bite them in the midterms. to the question of - So far, would you say Joe Biden has had the right priorities, or that he hasn't paid enough attention to the country's most important problems? 36% of independents say yes, Biden has, but 64% of independents say that Biden hasn't paid enough attention to this country's most important problems.

http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2021/images/11/08/rel7a.-.politics.pdf

 

That's nonsense.

It's fantasy the the evidence of tRump/Russian collusion was "MANUFACTURED" or singular as the quoted "Atlantic" article proves. Or that the investigation was launched because of the Steel Dossier; see the part in red above. I recommend reading the whole article ... it's apparent you will learn a lot. The only thing you got right is Joseph Biden IS President because he WON the 2020 election.

 

They did not lie. In the initial hours they were wrong. there is a difference. And your HRC quote "what difference does it make is out of context". When taken IN context it has a completely different meaning.



Your post is at best disingenuous, at worst you're guilty of what you've accused HRC and President Obama of.

 

Are we still believing the lie that Pelosi is in charge of Capitol security?

 

Congress and Pelosi has oversight over the Capitol Police.

 

Select members of Congress which does not include Pelosi. Where is the letter demanding if McConnell played a role considering he was the Senate leader.

 

they seem to be working their way up to the food chain, though I doubt the president will ever be subpoenaed, but everyone else will be, and if there is grounds for a criminal referral, they will make one.

But, they just might subpoena Trump, one never knows.

I think they should, most definitely. Let's see him lie to Congress, as he lies to everyone else.

 

I'll take your RCP article, the only one reliable of the three.


Here's the thing, all we have is what Mark Meadows tells us.

So, let him tell that to Congress, and let's see him say it under oath.

 

and the Investigation into the "Insurrection" has already ended .. because there was no "Insurrection" .. they will piddle around with the protesters until no longer politically expedient .. or until enough Witches have been drowned.

 

Yeah mostly for agravated tresspassing and the like. No charges for conspiracy, insurrection, or anything. They should have been fined and sent home months ago. Half of the weren't even at the riot.

 

Agreed... also....let's have Nancy Pelosi set in the same chair and tell us what she knew and when she knew it.

Video: Graham Asks ‘What Did Pelosi Know’ About Capitol Riot
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/graham-asks-about-what-pelosi-knew-prior-to-the-capitol-riot

 

She wasn't party to the Trump ( TBD ) conspiracy, but Meadows was.

It doesn't take more than a couple of videos to totally discredit Graham, who'll change his morals on a thin dime depending on who is in office.

 

There are more who proves you... yet again... wrong

January 6 did not have to happen and is a direct result of Pelosi and Congress derelict of duty to oversee the capitol police and provide the needed security to the capitol complex... Ashli Babbitts blood is on Pelosi's and Congress's hands....

The four senior lawmakers wrote Pelosi to demand answers to key questions “regarding the security of the Capitol on January 6th.” In their February 15 letter, they asked:

https://centerforsecuritypolicy.org...out-lack-of-security-at-capitol-on-january-6/

https://republicans-cha.house.gov/s...1 Letter to Speaker Pelosi re January 6th.pdf

 

All right wing nutcases.

Nunes?
Jordan?

Give me a break.

 

LOL. Arrests have been made recently in the Durham investigation regarding these people lying to the FBI. We already know others lied to the FISA courts. Strzok and Page talked about formulating an insurance policy in case Trump won. And Mueller found no connection between the Trump campaign and Russia trying to influence the election. Of course it was all manufactured for political gain.

 

Right. They're investigating an attempted coup.

 

What? https://www.axios.com/former-fbi-la...ext-51a615d0-3914-4423-96c5-0c16579037be.html
https://www.justsecurity.org/63838/guide-to-the-mueller-reports-findings-on-collusion/

 

Did you even bother to read the quotes much less the Atlantic article? Durham's two year investigation has produced two minor arrests which may not even be prosecuted. Durham's a hack, with a nasty scowel.