Taylor Budowich: Trump spokesman sues Jan. 6 committee to block access to his financial records

LINK: Taylor Budowich: Trump spokesman sues Jan. 6 committee to block access to his financial records (msn.com)

So what is the purpose of going after and trying to find out who paid for the rally and who paid for advertisements to get people to come to the rally? Are they still trying to connect "Russian collusion" to Trump or something? How far back in the line of people are they going to go?

 

Lol…you gotta love the smell of desperation coming from those who abetted trump’s seditious attempts to keep himself in power and now are left twisting in the wind while the malignant narcissist continues to skate.

 

lol smell of desperation from what? Do you HONESTLY think that they they’re going to find some secret communication with these people telling those groups to riot so trump can overthrow the government?

BAHAHAHAHAH

See your problem is you actually believe the bullshit those Dems are peddling.

There will be no convictions and absolutely zero consequences outside of having to show up to congress and waste their time for those people.

 

So no answer to my questions?

 

There’s nothing to find. Lol Anyone who thinks that trump somehow coordinated that riot as an attempt to overthrow the government is completely and utterly retarded.

And anyone who thinks they’re ACTUALLY going to find proof of that seriously needs to have their mental acuity checked.

 

Honestly never heard of this guy.... and I consider myself pretty familiar with the primary cast of insurrectionists...

This is the kind of off-the-radar person T**** and his cabal would use to do any actual dirty work (see M. Cohen), so I'm giving the Committee the BOTD that they are pulling on a solid thread.

This lawsuit proves that anyway... Shall I assume the GOP is financing this legal effort as well?

 

Lol...Anyone who claims that trump didn't go awol from his duties as potus after he lost the election and spend two months trying everything he could to overturn the results, including inciting a seditious insurrection, has been living on another planet .
History has already recorded what trump tried to do, and no amount of turd polishing can wash away the stain he left on our country.

 

I suppose until there's a clear picture of what led up to that day, how it was financed, who financed, and intended goals? Just a guess.

 

But but but, cnn says…….msnbc says….. they said peacefully protest means over throw the govco. But but but the liberal meadow says the ultra right rioters where there to overthrow the govco. Yes, they where unarmed but they where mean scary looking people, I bet they could overthrow the US govco without weapons.
But but but …..that Orangeman bad.

 

The 1/6 commission exists to harass certain subjects that certain members of the House want to harass, this has included members of the very House of representatives itself. We've never seen this kind of behavior for example, even during the Nixon investigation. With a new leader, the commission will likely dissolve or take a more pragmatic approach altogether. So vote Independent or R, I don't care but it's clear that the Democratic Party cannot be expected to represent its constituents as long as its obsessed with Donald. J. Trump.

 

The evidence they claim to be looking for doesn’t prove what they wish it did lol. It’s desperate and pointless.

The fiery bit mostly peaceful protest was a nothing burger. This authoritarianism from the left is the most dangerous political movement of our lifetime.

The d******* party is becoming the party of authoritarianism.

 

Don’t worry. The left is digging themselves very deep with this Jan 6 BS
It’s already starting to backfire on them
Sit back and get some popcorn

 

Waste of time? Then you should be happy to see it all play out to make the Dems look silly....right?

 

Sure not a problem. So far they’re 0 and what? 0-5 on investigations of trump? Their batting average sucks.

 

Yeah, we all saw the desperation of what the left wanted history to record.
First it was
1. A cop was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher
When that lied failed it was
2. The cop died from bear spray
When that lied failed it was
3. The cop died of his injuries
When that lied failed it was
4. Trump supporters climbed on the roof of the capital lowering the American flag and raising a Trump flag
When that lied failed it was
5. A Trump supporter crashed the gates
When that lied failed it was
6. AOC was hiding in a closet in fear for her life
When that lied failed it was
7. An Armed insurrection
When that lied failed it was
8. Trump supporters killed 5 people
When that lied failed it was
9. Trump had to be stopped from launching a nuclear strike on China
When that lied failed it was
10. Trump was going to institute marshal law to keep the presidency

Now its Trump incited an insurrection, where nobody is charged with insurrection?

 

Trying to hold Trump accountable for inciting an insurrection, where nobody has been charged with insurrection?
Speaks volumes for itself.

 

The events of that day meet the dictionary definition of an insurrection, even if nobody has been charged with that crime.

Trying to get all the facts about what happened that day is something every American patriot wants.

 

Oh, you mean the events of the day make the new leftist definition.
Like an insurrection is a violent uprising against an authority or government.
Yeah, we all saw that BS as well. The problem is it doesn't mirror what the law states (And has always stated) an insurrection is, which would be a violent attempt to take control of a government.

Which is why you there are no charges for insurrection.
But you are free to consume and regurgitate all the CNN BS you want too.

Sorry, a few hundred rioters does not an insurrection make. You would need an army like what we saw in Kabul taken by the Taliban.
But if you feel the need to exaggerate your claim to try and make yet another fake point, you are free to do so.

 

Just to have your back

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/insurrection
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sedition

The way I differentiate those 2 words is that T****'s actions (with others) from 11/3 through the morning of 1/6 are sedition.

1/6 was the insurrection attempt... because of the violence aspect...

Also, insurrection isn't technically a crime on the US books, but sedition is... if/when there is a charge along those lines, it will be seditious conspiracy

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2384

All they need to do is connect 2 people to form the conspiracy aspect... the guts of that code has already clearly been met, in actual charges today (1512)

 

Now the left is backpedaling from insurrection to Sedition? No kidding.
They got egg on their faces for trying to push the fake insurrection claims with their fake definition of what an insurrection actually is.
Leftist definition
A violent act against the government.
The real legal definition
A violent act to take over a government

Now its on to Sedition which the left wants to change its definition but that will fail as well.
Sedition is the act of inciting revolt or violence against a lawful authority or government with the goal of destroying or overthrowing it.

Since the leftist new definitions don't actually mirror what the laws that have been on the books for decades, this 4 hour riot is just a 4 hour riot.
Sorry for your loss

 

Trump's biggest issue was he invited them there... he should have left that to grassroots groups, this is why most politicians would keep a hands off approach

 

They have to follow the money trail. It goes to motive and facilitation.

He needed to sanction it, defacto 'suggest to them what he wanted them to do'.

 

Well the truth seems to be set aside for all Trump supporters, especially when they can't even accept the reality that 2 Rep led Senate committees concluded the Trump campaign met and worked with Russian officials.

 

Close enough.. seems you're (slowly) getting it... Keep putting in the work

Sedition and Insurrection are very close in meaning, so I don't blame people for confusing the two...

Key point to remember (again) is that insurrection is not a term in our legal system, much like collusion...

 

No they didn't. More fake news.