We have all read back to your post throughout the thread. More flip flops than a Caribbean beach Well, that the first thing you said that was true More exaggerations about Rittenhouse being claimed a some hero only verifies my previous claims. I guess when its all ya got, its all ya got But do continue Maybe you can learn something from that
You have no basis to call him anazi. Hde flashed no white power sign and everybody knows this. You included.
The basis is mentioned in my previous post, that you hardly are responding to. ^^ This is a white supremacist -who massacred 51 praying Muslims- making white power sign that 4chan started as a joke. We all know it. You so lost this discussion.
You never mentioned what my flip flops are. So this is just a personal attack. coming from a person who claims Kyle was breaking up a fight, when he repeatedly was hitting a girl in the face.
I won this discussion. That is an OK sign and everyone knows igt YOU INCLUDED. You are repeating a statement which is a PROVEN lie.
4chan teaches it's a WP sign. The nazi uses it, as shown in that picture. While your denialism isn't backed up by anything. They never do. Hence it's why you lost the discussion.
4chan is nogt a valid source and is irrelevant. You are denying fact which has been proven. You lost big time and you know it
He stated an objective fact that proved you objectively wrong. Repeatedly, and until its no longer necessary, you have been and will continue to be proven wrong. You were wrong before the facts came out, and wrong since the facts have come out, and continue to be wrong. I dont know if its on purpose or not but the truth remains the same.
4chan trolled you, and you continue to fall for it. Thats the OK sign. You have no evidence backing your assertions. Kyle defended himself and righteously rid the planet of 2 terrorists, and wounded a third and is getting paid big to have done it.
That "vid" is so blurry that no one can tell who the guy is. Believing it was Kyle is nothing more than wishful thinking on your part. Why? Because you can't prove that its Kyle in that vid. The OK sign is not a white power sign. No matter how much you claim it is. But hey, I guess Obama is a white supremacist going by your derpy claim. Here's a little hint for you, just because some white supremacists use the OK sign does not mean that everyone that uses it is a white supremacist. In order to prove that Kyle meant it as such then you're going to have to have evidence of him saying or doing something that shows he supports white supremacists. Which you know you cannot do. Simply flashing the OK sign is not enough to determine anything. Unless you want to admit that Obama is a white supremacist? Yeah...didn't think so. That particular video does not show Kyle at all. Not even once. So no, you have no evidence that Kyle said such. You just have a conspiracy theory. So let me get this straight, you got your basis based on a video that is so blurry that you can't tell who is in it, a picture of Kyle flashing the same OK sign that Millions, if not BILLIONS, of people use through out the entire world, AND another video that doesn't show Kyle once. And you expect to be taken seriously on ANYTHING after this display of, to put it nicely, partisanship?
So because a nazi used it that makes everyone else that uses it a white supremacist? Damn...poor Obama...and here I thought he was safe from being called a racist by people like you. Oh wait....you'll make an excuse for Obama. And for anyone else that still makes that sign but also espouses the same crap you do. Millions, if not Billions of people use the OK sign. The only way to prove that a person actually means it in the "white power" way is if there is evidence beyond using that gesture. Something you do not have for Kyle. Without it all you're doing is making a false claim.
The recording was done with a regular smartphone, not some security camera from the 1980's who are blurred. Depending on the context it is. A nazi being in court and proud he massacred 51 peaceful Muslims making that sign, is not a sign that's he's doing fine but a sign that he's on a white power trip. Same with Kyle... he was serenaded by nazi's with their "anthem" and subsequently was posing with them on camera with WP signs. I mentioned he got judged over it, and you still claim it's not proven? I never said you can see him on that vid. You do however clearly hear his voice. It's not even being denied. Well, you're going that low to claim it's not proven that Kyle was flashing WP with nazi's while he's been judged over it that he was. So you know... your opinion is just flat out dishonest on this entire subject. Big Whoop.
Doesn't matter what it was done with. The person in it that is claimed to be Kyle is a blurred image. There is no proof that it is actually him. Again, you have no idea if he meant it as a white power sign. You are just assuming that he is. For all you know he was doing it just because everyone around him was doing it and doesn't know a thing about what a white supremacist means by it. Please present the link with the judges finding that Kyle purposefully used it as a white power sign. Go ahead, I'll wait. And no, I do not want an article from some news media "interpreting" the judgement. I want the actual judgement. Can you prove that is Kyles voice? Did you get it analyzed? Why didn't the prosecutor put it in the trial? Surely he would have had it analyzed? Again, provide the actual judgement. I have yet to state a single opinion. It is a fact that first video is blurry. It is a fact that the picture shows Kyle flashing the OK sign. You have no evidence that it is meant as anything else. And it is a fact that you don't see Kyle in the other video. IE: You have no evidence for any of your claims. You are just making assumptions.
It matters, since that proves the images are clear, while your claim is simply an unfounded opinion. My argument isn't about what I think, but what the judge has ruled and so that's my proof. It's crystal clear that the judge altered the conditions for Kyle when reviewing what Kyle did with them nazi's. It's widely available to be found, hence I am not going to source jack about it. You're free to dispute my claim dragging up that source. Again. Nobody denies it's him. I can not prove a negative. Again. The source is widely available to be found that the judge altered his conditions, hence I am not going to source jack about it. You're free to dispute my claim dragging up that source. Your claim that the vid is blurry,... is just your unfounded opinion.
Except when looking at the actual video footage it is quite evident that you cannot tell whether or not the person that is claimed to be Kyle is actually Kyle or not. If you believe otherwise then feel free to provide the video and prove your claim that it IS him in the video. So provide the judgement. Lets see what the judge actually ruled on. You're making the claim of what the judge ruled on. The onus is on you to prove it. Provide the judgement or be known to not be portraying things truthfully. You are asserting that video has Kyle in it. That is a positive claim. You saying that you cannot prove a negative means that its not him. So which is it? Are you making the positive claim that he is in that video, in which case you can prove that its him, or you cannot prove a negative which means you cannot prove that it is him and therefore it is not him. I'm not doing your homework for you. You are making a claim as to what the judge ruled on. The onus is on you to prove your claim. You're making the positive claim that it is him. Provide the non-edited video. We all know that you're just going to continue to refuse to provide ANY evidence of your claims. Claiming that we are the ones that should do it. Sorry, but its not our job to prove your claims. I believe the old saying of "Either put up, or shut up" would apply here.
Personally, I don't believe he's a white supremacist nor have I even seen any evidence that he's even a little racist. However, even if he's Hitler incarnate, I don't see why it would matter. Being a white supremacist is legal in this country just as it is legal to hate all white people or hate all gun owners. Kyle didn't hurt any black people that I have heard of and the only person that attacked him and wasn't shot, was a black man. Can anyone explain why it would matter if he were to be a white supremacist?
It matters to people like notme because it lends justification to systemic racism imbedded in our courts. They can point to it and say "SEE!!! A WHITE SUPREMACIST GOT AWAY WITH MURDER WHILE WE HAVE HANDS UP DON'T SHOOT BLACK PEOPLE BEING KILLED FOR NO REASON!!"
That's about it. Some poster just wants to virtue signal his way over all the lies he's been leaving here. Calling people a nazi is just amusingly trollish but when that's all you got...
The vid was recorded with a regular cellphone with the adequate amount of pixels so there is nothing doggy about it. This is my opinion that is founded on what we know. Your unfounded opinion is calling that "not relevant". Your unfounded opinion is that it's blurred. I do not care about any unfounded opinion. I add to this that the quality of that recording is on par of the quality of the recording used by Kyle's defense team to show he's not guilty. You know it is, if you followed the case. I already responded to this with "It's widely available to be found, hence I am not going to source jack about it. You're free to dispute my claim dragging up that source". You show to have zero interest in this by refusing to look this up yourself, so I can not be bothered to be trolled around by you. When you search for that vid, you only counter articles that it's his voice. I'm not to blame for that. You dispute that it's his voice. And I can't prove that negative. I'm also not to blame for that. Indeed. You can use google yourself about a subject that has been made public by the government. You are either interested in the case, and look it up so you know what we're discussing or apply some old saying.
