Cop Who Killed Ashli Babbitt Never Interviewed By Investigators, Now Back In Charge Of House Securit

Good. He did nothing wrong.

 

It's all he needs.

 

It is so stupid how this issue falls along partisan lines.

The same folks regularly talking about obeying law enforcement and the consequences when you don't have now forgotten all about the times they've said those things because this time in this high profile case it's a right-winger that was killed by a police officer.

Logical consistency is important. If the police shootings and the sympathy to the job of being a police officer can lead you to side with the cops in shootings involving other folks disobeying law enforcement while committing a crime, you can't just abandon that stance because you agree with the politics behind why Ashli Babbitt was in the Capital building. It shouldn't matter, as she did the same things that others who have been shot have done.

I get it, situations have to be examined based on the details of each situation. Blanket approaches don't work either. But the details in this case do not differ from many of the other police shootings.

Person involved with crime that includes violence.
Person disobeys law enforcement
Person shot by police.

 

What you're saying is true. What the Federalist is saying isn't.

 

LOL!!! They are kinda "nutty"!

 

You say this as if you have her medical file open in front of you. Of course you have the ability to provide a citation for any of the assertions you've made above.... which would then require you to have access to her medical history.... which would then be an admission of guilt for disclosing a medical condition of a private citizen which is against the law under HIPAA. whoopsie....

 

I want to know why the "killer Cop" selected Ashli and focused his front sight on her. Why did he particularly select this one individual and what threat in particular did she offer?.......or, as seems evident, did he just fire randomly at the crowd? From his past careless record(as in leaving his service revolver in a restroom) I believe that to be the case.

 

I know it's not true but I'm not going to waste my time finding a source to show you why when you'll start a pissing match telling me my source isn't true.

 

And Floyd was passing counterfeit bills, under the influence of an illegal substance and resisting arrest. Can you say "equal justice under the law"?

 

So.. in your mind, a cop can just shoot randomly into a crowd and kill anyone they want. Not a question, it's what you just suggested. I suspect this will then be your position in any future, or for that matter, previous, conversation. Oh, wait.... it isn't consistent. Perhaps you should explain your reasoning then as to why black cop shoots unarmed white woman is different from your position on white cop shoots unarmed black person. This should be entertaining.

 

Because she actually breached the last perimeter of safety for the elected officials being protected and contained within that final perimeter. It worked and sadly she was a causality.

 

Floyd was already fully subdued.

 

I thought it was guns which killed.

 

Did she now... So why didn't any of the other capitol police who were with her find her actions deadly enough to use any force against her?

 

LOL.. exactly. The left here just don't want to acknowledge the use of the gun by the capitol police officer that actually killed her. Looks like protecting the minority cop is more important to them than dispensing justice. Oh, and it demonstrates a body count for their hoax insurrection.

 

There were several others equally breaching including three hundred let in at other entrance by Capitol Police. Why Ashli? That question should have been asked. I don't know what position I would be in if I shot an unarmed intruder in my own business or home. I suspect I would be subject to manslaughter or at least a very large civil suit!

 

Guess Ashli was subdued as well.

 

Would you allow Babbit to jump through your broken window into your home or into your place of business with an angry mindless mob behind her?

 

Randomly into a crowd? Of course not. What a stupid suggestion.

What position are you suggesting I have? Skin color of the cop or the victim means nothing to me, but clearly it does to you.

 

After that fine police officer took her traitorous ass out, I guess she was.

 

I'm pretty sure if someone was climbing through your window at your house with your family inside, you'd feel different !!! Come on, be honest.

 

Everyone please ask yourself, if someone was climbing through your window at home. And you told them to stop or you are going to shoot. What are you really going to do if they continue to proceed? Would you feel like you just murdered someone or just doing what you had to to defend your family ??? Please be honest with yourselves.

 

Facts, as they say, not in evidence, and there is no investigatory artifact that demonstrates this was a condition. The evidence, and video show that other capitol police were with the groups she was a part of. They didn't assess this as dangerous, did they. None of those police officers thought it was appropriate to use deadly force. And when it was used through a closed door, they were just as much at risk as anyone else in the group was.

 

And yet there is no evidence that the shot was aimed, or that the CP LT intended to only kill Ashli. It seems problematic then that you have said this was a rigthteous shoot. I suggest that going forward, you should be consistent, at least.

 

I have always been consistent, so this comment makes no sense whatsoever.

Is there evidence that it was a random shot, and just accidentally happened to hit the only person breaching through the barricade?

She made an incredibly stupid choice and faced the consequences. If you don't agree with "bad choice ==> bad outcome", then lets keep that in mind in future conversations.