You think women should be forced to carry their rapist's baby because your Imaginary Friend told you they should. I happen to think otherwise.
I presented evidence you ignored. Women shouldn't have to carry their rapist's baby and then perhaps face a 20+ years of harassment by the perp demanding parental rights. So, then, she gives up the baby to get away and then faces demands for financial support from "dad." Of course, your Imaginary Friend told you this is okay.
That's just preposterous nonsence . you forget who schooled you in covid .. in "the Science" .. and "the Data" .. you getting spanked at every turn .. posting links that did not even address your silly claims .. never mind support those claims. When you last ran away from the playground you were trying to peddle the narrative that the Risk of harm from Long Omicron is greater than the vax for healthy people who have already had covid. .. ZERO evidence for this claim did you provide. . now returning to the playground crying "Your not interested in evidence" Got a case of projection brought on by butt-hurt it seems. I know it hurts .. but do try harder to keep your maladies to yourself .. don't want none of that disease.
Republican economic policies, most recently the tax cut in 2017 where 85% went to people making $400,000+ a year after Trump said the top bracket shouldn't be reduced, have contributed to this...
It's very simple, you didn't refute this post: http://www.politicalforum.com/index...l-goes-too-far.598652/page-24#post-1073384951
I've received many "warnings" about it along with notices that my posts on the topic have been removed. It is clearly a policy.
Yeah, I know—you schooled @CenterField, too. Takes some nerve to "school" a vaccine researcher on vaccines when your information comes from anti-vaxxer propaganda. You come off like the former Braggart-in-Chief, Donald John Trump.
Which still leaves her with two other choices, doesn't it? (oh I'm sorry, actually 3, if we include the choice to not get pregnant)
Then there are exceptions. For example, a woman shouldn't have to carry a fetus that can't live outside the womb.
Who is the "Braggart in Chief" - The one who makes bold claims and can not back them up .. which is you. Never heard of "Centerfield" and you never presented info from this person. Now you make up some fantasy about me schooling this person rather than a backing up your nonsense claim .. that Long Covid from Omicron is more risk of harm than the vax.
You seem ill- informed, on this point. Do you think separate assessments are made, for different fetuses, all judged to be at 24 weeks of gestation? I believe that the 24 week mark is when any fetus is considered to be potentially viable, with extraordinary medical aid. In practice, though, many would not survive at this point; then again, a few would survive, after as little as 22 weeks. So "viability," is a pre-determined point for all, not an exceptional case. Exceptional cases are just that: uncommon circumstances which are specifically addressed, in law, as excluded from any time limitation. IOW, these special cases do not justify a removal of any limit whatsoever, for abortion in all normal pregnancies, aside from the unusual situations of the life or health of the mother being suddenly seen as at heightened risk, or the discovery of a serious birth defect, at a late point, in the pregnancy.