Replacement 'theory'

And yet another rabbit hole deflection post that can't address the point I made from the outset. What are your posts trying to avoid and obfuscate? <Rhetorical BTW..

 

A poster who was not here for fake deflection, rabbit holes, strawman, ect claims would have said,
Show me.

But you don't want that, do you. lol
As I said, your post speak for themselves lol

 

For God's sake you are going to need to (gasp) think for yourself!! Was he talking about changing voter demographics or was he talking about diluting the white race? Context matters ffs.

 

Still deflecting?

Try debating this again:
A radicalized white male, a domestic terrorist white supremacist who believed in the conspiracy replacement theory purveyed by many far RW nuts including Fox's Tucker Carlson is part of the topic of this thread along with the conspiracy replacement theory.

 

You have yet to show that Carlson or anyone else was pushing the flavor of "replacement theory" that led to the shooting. Try harder.

 

What is "the replacement theory"? Who authored it? Was it peer reviewed? I didn't know it existed until yesterday.

 

if we cannot know for certain it’s now safe to assume they all do. Doesn’t really matter since the problem they bring in massive numbers is gang members like ms13, extravagant costs for speaking Spanish classes and free meals, insurance debacles of epic proportions and crime. Of and taking free stuff which costs us billions.
But if you want to explain to the thousands upon thousands of American families who lost a loved one to some roach who killed them and scooted back over the border I’ll drive while you go to the door and talk.

 

See post #78. The shooter claimed this was his motive and Carlson uses the same conspiracy theory to target and blame the dems/minorities for it. It's not rocket science but you are trying to tightly frame it a specific way. Research the distinction without a difference argument.

 

Desperately seeking a distinction without a difference foothold is still a failed debate style.

 

I want to know the tenets of replacement theory. And BTW, if I'm speaking against illegal immigration because I think a political party is pro illegal immigration because it benefits their chances of staying in power that is VERY different than believing there are forces at play to dilute the white race. These are absolutely NOT distinctions without differences. That you think they are tells me you ought to excuse yourself from this discussion. Let the adults talk.

 

Yes, any answer you get you can't dispute is always deflecting, in your mind

I did answer it.

1. The shooter was not involved in any replacement theory. He never claimed to be. You just regurgitated that from CNN.

2. The shooter specified in his own manifest he was a left wing, Christina hating, Conservative hating, White Supremist, who supported Bidens green new deal

3. The only replacement theory Carlson ever discussed was about voter fraud replacing votes

4. You never even knew anything about replacement theory before last Friday, have never made a post about it, nor can you find ANYONES post about it

Now, dispute that or you can do what we all know you will do.
Deflect and run.
GUARANTEED YOU CAN'T DISPUTE IT

 

prove it

 

You post was answered and exposed as a failed distinction without a difference debate reach. Sorry.

 

You are still posting deflections. What are you trying to avoid dealing with the OP and my posts?

 

Did any of Tuckers alleged screeds ever have anything at all to do with blacks? Or was he always referring to illegal immigration/hispanics? Does it strike you as odd that the shooter targeted African Americans if he were radicalized by Fox News? Or do you only regurgitate what you hear on cnn and then come here to troll?

 

Where? Go back under your bridge ffs.

 

So now, if you are asked questions about the subject matter, those are deflections??????????
Your post speak for themselves
Keep running. You do it so magnificently

If you could dispute it, you would. Another fake post

Show me where I'm wrong if you have the ability.
(Which we all know you don't)

1. The shooter was not involved in any replacement theory. He never claimed to be. You just regurgitated that from CNN.

2. The shooter specified in his own manifest he was a left wing, Christian hating, Conservative hating, White Supremist, who supported Bidens green new deal

3. The only replacement theory Carlson ever discussed was about voter fraud replacing votes

4. You never even knew anything about replacement theory before last Friday, have never made a post about it, nor can you find ANYONES post about it

 

Sorry, you failed attempt at a distinction without a difference did not work. I can't help with that since it was likely disingenuous to begin with.
There is not room under the bridge, it's occupied by your failed distinction without a difference rabbit hole.

 

"Replacement Theory" is more a commentary and analysis of human birthrates than anything else. Simply put, the 'Third World' has an enormous birthrate compared with the 'settled' White populations in the United States and Europe. Poverty, food scarcity, and every crime imaginable, along with warfare, is rife throughout much of this 'Third World' -- so -- what do the Third World populations do? THEY HEAD TO WHERE PEOPLE HAVE IT BETTER. Is this a mystery?

I'm not condoning any kind of 'mass-movement' migration, border-crashing, or anything else... but merely pointing out that if there's one central point that speaks clearly to the advent of phenomena like "Replacement Theory", it's rampant overpopulation in the Third World... because it is the direct contributor to everything else....

 

The one running is the one claiming others are, mirror much?
Why not simply address this:
a radicalized white male, a domestic terrorist white supremacist who believed in the conspiracy replacement theory purveyed by many far RW nuts including Fox's Tucker Carlson is part of the topic of this thread along with the conspiracy replacement theory.

 

https://twitter.com/ProjectLincoln/status/1526380615452528640?t=xrFlMKnq47qxfZljLsU0tg&s=19

 

Hmmm, that funny, seems I posted statements of fact from his own manifest.
That you can't dispute and keep running from
Much like these.

1. The shooter was not involved in any replacement theory. He never claimed to be. You just regurgitated that from CNN.

2. The shooter specified in his own manifest he was a left wing, Christian hating, Conservative hating, White Supremist, who supported Bidens green new deal

3. The only replacement theory Carlson ever discussed was about voter fraud replacing votes

4. You never even knew anything about replacement theory before last Friday, have never made a post about it, nor can you find ANYONES post about it

So who's running again?

I did.
According to his own manifest
A radicalized white male, a domestic terrorist white supremacist who claimed he was a left winger, who hated Christians, who hated Conservatives, who supported Bidens green new deal, had nothing to do with conspiracy replacement theory.

 

Out of context claims only show your own desperation when you can't dispute the facts.
But pretty typical of a lefty

 

The only one running from the below statement is you:
a radicalized white male, a domestic terrorist white supremacist who believed in the conspiracy replacement theory purveyed by many far RW nuts including Fox's Tucker Carlson is part of the topic of this thread along with the conspiracy replacement theory.

 

Why do you completely ignore the most prevalent replacement theory, the leftists' cancel culture???