Al Jazeera reporter killed during Israeli raid in West Bank

What questions are moronic ? answer what ?

presented plenty more than that .. need to refresh that memory card mate.

 

I sourced it ages ago and what experts worked on it, and you are conceding to their research by failing to rebuke it.
That's how it works.

 

Wouldn't be the first time .. but perhaps not .. lets investigate tell me what the term cease-fire agreement means. and what it means to be at war.

 

The ones which I asked.

My questions. You answered them even though you said that they are "moronic." I gave links to your replies. Links again below. I don't know why you're so confused.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...d-in-west-bank.599594/page-29#post-1073531351

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...d-in-west-bank.599594/page-29#post-1073531356

If that's true, then it's pretty damn telling that you cannot bring yourself to repeat just ONE of them! Just ONE!

 

Nothing to do with a CRIMINAL INQUIRY!

 

Well "cease-fires" are a totally meaningless JOKE in the Israel - Palestine conflict, and I do not take them one bit seriously. But anyway, I use these definitions:

 

You still are conceding to the argument Palestine requested the ICC to take it over.
And the ICC shook the hands of the representative of Palestine when they handed over the investigation.
That will do for me. And you're free to prove this means they are not going to do anything with it, but you are not.

Aha. So you got no argument.

Aha. So you got no argument.

In short:
CNN proved that Israel murdered the reporter.
It is a well written piece of independent investigating journalism.
You conceding to it, by not being able to debunk it.

You are just resorting to attacking the messenger, but not the message itself.
And in this case: the messenger is a highly esteemed independent news organization that can do this kind of investigating reporting with ease.
And we all know it. Simple.

 

No, I did not object to you saying that Palestine requested the ICC to take it over. They obviously did request it!

Meaningless. You think that a handshake means something?

I can't argue for something which I did not claim!

We are in agreement that the ICC is independent, so there's nothing to argue about! Simple!

In short:
CNN are not a legal investigative authority.
CNN has nothing to do with CRIMINAL proof.
CNN did not even claim that it is proof of ANY kind.
In the eyes of international law, it has not been determined who is to blame.

 

You're not showing how this matters, when CNN proved that Israel killed the reporter.

 

Aha. So you got no argument.

You shake hands on a deal.

Aha. So you got no argument.

Aha. So you got no argument.

You never explained why this matters.

You never explained why this matters.

yeah well, technically, Chris Cobb-Smith did, an explosive weapons expert.
He is the guy making the claim that the bullet flew the exact same distance between the IDF and the reporter.
And since the Palestinians were much further away, it must have been the IDF.
While the IDF admit that they were at that distance.

So what. You still conceding to the evidence.

 

Not even @Grau thinks that CNN has proved anything!

 

Yes, and it's a GUARANTEE?

Alright, well then you should have no problems quoting him saying that it's criminal proof.

There is no publicly available criminal evidence to observe.

 

You are free to source how ICC is unreliable, to prove your deflecting point. I'm guessing this will end in an "Aha. So you got no argument." ... thing stands that there is an independent investigation organized on the request by Palestine. And you putting in bold and capitals that they declined a joined investigation, meaning its bad they declined it... has been conceded by you that the independent inquiry is superior.

I already sourced that the expert proved the bullet flew the distance between the IDF and the reporter.
The IDF admits they were at that distance. While CNN proved the Palestinians were much further away.
That's all what is needed to prove the IDF killed the reporter, until you get to debunk the proof.
But you haven't made 1 attempt to debunk the proof, so you've conceded.

And so the report stands, and you conceded to it by not being able to debunk it.

 

You continue to pretend that I make claims! This time you pretend that I called the ICC unreliable when I did not. It's not about their reliability. If they end up saying NO to the Palestinians, this will not make them unreliable. Although perhaps you would say that it WOULD make them unreliable.

You did not quote the expert.

There's no point in debunking something which has no actual relevance.

 

Go and learn about the Jewish Nakba.
800000 to 1000000 Jews were expelled from their homes in Arab countries.
The Jewish Nakba !
Do they teach that important subject in Arab schools ?

 

I shed tears for every dead .. you only on Arabs ..
Next

 

You keep posting very suggestive questions for me to answer and then undoubtingly demand me to prove it.
I am indeed countering this that you need to make your own argument that you prove.

So what. He's mentioned all over in the CNN article that I linked.

You're just saying that CNN proving Israel killed the reporter isn't relevant, because you apparently can't debunk their article.
Like I previously mentioned: your only resort is attacking the messenger. It's dull.

 

whataboutism
You're not replying to my previous post, so I take it you are conceding that Israel ethnically cleansed + 700,000 Arab civilians who all, including their decedents, have the right to return.

 

I didn't say they were moronic .... only confusion is yours mate ... as usual.

Repeat what .. your so confused you asking me to repeat something that stated in the links you posted.

 

Arab Bedouins fled back to their true countries during 1948 war.
Deal with it.

 

You're still not contesting that Israel ethnically cleansed + 700,000 Arab civilians who all, including their decedents, have the right to return.

 

So which "moronic question" were you referring to in your below post?

 

Telling a lie 1000 times, will not change it to truth.
We are familliar with the Palestinian wall of lies "right to return".

 

No specific question was referred to ....

 

You are not familiar with squat .. Israel a bad actor in the region .. needs to be leashed .. and as you state- telling 1000 lies will not that truth change