Appeals Court dismisses Mar-A-Lago Special Master

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Egoboy, Dec 1, 2022.

  1. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,360
    Likes Received:
    11,141
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I heard it stayed the judge's order. Did I miss something?
     
  2. omni

    omni Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2021
    Messages:
    6,039
    Likes Received:
    5,403
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So do you know what a stay is? It's not favorable to Trump in this case.
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2022
  3. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    16,180
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So you have NO credible evidence AT ALL but we should believe without question because, get this, TRUMP says so.

    The Right is getting beyond BELIEF. Snake oil salesmen in Mark Twain novels are lots more believable and were at least entertaining
     
  4. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    16,180
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Then he sent them off to the RNC

    Or, wait, I know. Sweet GE HAY sus took those pictchers. How dare I stand against GOD HIMSELF (and his appointed and anointed representative on Earth, Donald John TRUMP

    I'm SATAN, that's it; SATAN HIMSELF HAS POSSESSED THIS BOARD
     
  5. Heartburn

    Heartburn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2015
    Messages:
    13,499
    Likes Received:
    4,973
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Racists though
     
  6. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    109,654
    Likes Received:
    37,410
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If that’s all it was how did so many Russian spies get indicted? Were they part of the campaign lol
     
  7. Bush Lawyer

    Bush Lawyer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2018
    Messages:
    15,033
    Likes Received:
    9,491
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Huh?
     
    Noone likes this.
  8. Bush Lawyer

    Bush Lawyer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2018
    Messages:
    15,033
    Likes Received:
    9,491
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No it is not. You can waltz down to your local Court House and file some suit against anyone you like. Pay the filing fee and Bob's yer Uncle. Suit on. Suit loses, just like Humpty is always losing.
     
    Noone likes this.
  9. Moolk

    Moolk Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    19,283
    Likes Received:
    14,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And you can interpret them in any manner you wish.
     
  10. Hey Now

    Hey Now Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    17,074
    Likes Received:
    13,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, fawning all over "Dear Leader" puts her into Federalist & SCOTUS territory. :eyepopping:
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2022
  11. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,181
    Likes Received:
    11,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Warrants can be challenged.

    https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/received-a-search-warrant-10-facts-you-3337954/#:~:text=While a federal search warrant cannot be overly,evidence that is relevant to the government’s investigation.
    Without the SM, we'll never know the full scope of what documents the warrant didn't authorize seizure of. There have been cases where search warrants were invalidated even though at the time the Judge issued them they were considered lawful. The FBI, for example, lied to the FISA court for a warrant. If not for the efforts of a government watchdog org. we might have never known about it.
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2022
  12. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,181
    Likes Received:
    11,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Thanks for the correction (as trivial as it is).
     
  13. mdrobster

    mdrobster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    34,171
    Likes Received:
    12,795
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No the bottom line is Trump should not have been in possession of those documents, period. !!!!!

    Any Joe off the street would already be in jail. Keep making excuses for the most traitorous man in the USA.
     
  14. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,181
    Likes Received:
    11,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  15. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,181
    Likes Received:
    11,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Trump shouldn't be in possession of his personal documents?
     
  16. mdrobster

    mdrobster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    34,171
    Likes Received:
    12,795
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Those are not his personal documents.
     
  17. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,181
    Likes Received:
    11,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, apparently some of those that were seized clearly were because they were returned. The question is is how many didn't they return.
     
  18. mdrobster

    mdrobster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    34,171
    Likes Received:
    12,795
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's fine, still illegal to posses the other documents, period.
     
  19. Hey Now

    Hey Now Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    17,074
    Likes Received:
    13,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Who's question is that? Someone unable to focus on reality? Rhetorical BTW.
     
  20. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,181
    Likes Received:
    11,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, that is yet to be determined. Assuming, for the sake of argument, that a POTUS declassified a document would you really care if he had it in his possession? What if he was to make a copy of it? Would you expect even the copy of a declassified document be turned over to the government? Why?
     
  21. Hey Now

    Hey Now Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    17,074
    Likes Received:
    13,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Assume Joe reclassified them on Jan 20th.....hello!
     
    omni likes this.
  22. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,181
    Likes Received:
    11,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Evidently it's a question Trump's legal team is asking. Anyone who opposes excessive search and seizures should be asking it also.
     
  23. Hey Now

    Hey Now Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    17,074
    Likes Received:
    13,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trump's legal team is on a raft in the Amazon. No paddle...
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2022
  24. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,181
    Likes Received:
    11,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Senile Joe has trouble following his cheat notes. It's doubtful he would know what documents needed to be reclassified. Besides, once declassified a document's distribution cannot be undone, so what would be the point?
     
  25. Hey Now

    Hey Now Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    17,074
    Likes Received:
    13,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Deflection noted after I filled in a very shallow rabbit hole! :)
     
    omni likes this.

Share This Page