Trump Is Disqualified From the 2024 Ballot, Colorado Supreme Court Rules

Who is at Anna Pressley? Were these people at the time significant social influencers? Last I heard Kamal did not have a huge dedicated following of rabid fanatics

 

But was found to have committed insurrection by the Colorado district court

 

Hmmm…you mean the impeachment, in which a majority in both houses found him guilty…and on a bipartisan basis in both houses….that impeachment…??

 

No judge has that power
Unless you can just toss these out

Article III Section 2 a trial for all Crimes except Impeachment shall be by Jury. And the 6th Amendment, In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy trial and a public trial by an impartial jury

The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you

Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

But a judge in Colorado has the power to supersede the constitution?
In what world do you live?

 

Neither of which are qualifications for being above the law

 

Yeah, the one where he was acquitted of insurrection

 

you clearly don't understand the process-Trump wasn't impeached either time. Thus your claim is without merit

 

The House passed the article of impeachment on January 13, 2021, by a 232–197 vote. All 222 Democrats voted to impeach, joined by 10 Republicans.

At the conclusion of the trial, the Senate voted 57–43 to convict Trump of inciting insurrection, falling 10 votes short of the two-thirds majority required by the Constitution, and Trump was therefore acquitted.

So not sure where you got the idea about the majority of both houses from

 

Doesn’t seem to have influenced the Colorado Supreme Court does it? One would assume they too know the law

 

Even Trump believes he was impeached - that is why he wanted them expunged https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposed_expungements_of_the_impeachments_of_Donald_Trump

 

Yet it influenced 13 other states not to do this idiocy to include 3 Democrats in Colorado.
So its your opinion that 4 judges know better that the 30 or so who disagreed.

Which is why we have a SCOTUS that puts down idiotic leftist Democrats all the time who also claim to know the law.
Just like the idiotic Democrats who know the law that get destroyed on their 2nd amendment claims

 

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics a 501c3 is taking credit.



Our Team - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (citizensforethics.org)





Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. Contributions to political campaign funds or public statements of position (verbal or written) made on behalf of the organization in favor of or in opposition to any candidate for public office clearly violate the prohibition against political campaign activity. Violating this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes.

The Restriction of Political Campaign Intervention by Section 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Organizations | Internal Revenue Service (irs.gov)

 

Sigh…From this simple thing called ‘English’. A majority means ‘the greater number or amount’. In both houses, a greater number voted to impeach. In other words, a MAJORITY in both houses voted that way and the votes were bipartisan in nature.

The reason the scumbag wasn’t convicted is that your Constitution requires more than a majority in the Senate. But, nevertheless, most people wanted him gone…

 

For Pete’s sake man….learn your own bloody system…! He was impeached BOTH times. He wasn’t CONVICTED, however, because of the requirements in that Senate process…

 

which MEANS HE WAS NOT GUILTY

 

why are there so many foreigners with serious hard ons for Trump.

 

sounds like grounds for a grand jury investigation

 

he wasn't removed. he was essentially indicted and not convicted. it was a waste of time by venal democrats. It was equally stupid when done to Clinton

 

Impeachment is a POLITICAL process, not a LEGAL one.

He can still be tried, in a court of law, for any crimes committed related to his two impeachments (as long as the statute of limitations has not expired)

 

you all lost. get over it

 

He was not convicted. However, he was impeached…twice.

Let me break it down for you in baby steps, since you clearly don’t know how your own system works…

Liken it to a criminal process…

In a criminal case, a grand jury votes, by majority, to indict the suspect on various charges. The accused is then brought to trial.
In an impeachment process, the House takes the place of a grand jury and votes, by majority, to impeach the individual and have them then stand trial in the Senate.

In a criminal case, the indicted person stands trial and a judge or jury determines their guilt and any punishment that might result.
In an impeachment process, the impeached person stands trial before the Senate, wherein a 2/3 vote is required to convict and possibly bar the person from any future position.

Clear now…? You’re welcome…

 

this sort of arrogance is pitiful. I forget more about the US legal system daily than you will ever know. Trump was not removed and thus those who started the process LOST, I noted it was akin to an indictment and guess what-if you are INDICTED but not convicted, the indictment has NO RELEVANCE WHATSOEVER after that.

 

How does teaching you English have anything to do with The Stain…?? Nice attempt at deflection…

 

Then why don’t you start demonstrating some of that knowledge…!?

 

You haven't taught me anything other than you are a serious bit of Trump hate. Democrats and RINOS were mad Trump won. so they pushed this crap KNOWING IT WOULD LOSE IN THE SENATE, to try to embarrass Trump and help the Talibiden prevail in the 2020 election. Nothing more nothing less. Calling Trump the stain sort of suggests the issue is with you