'Truthers' often insist that they want a new investigation complete with "subpoena power". So tell me: Whom would you subpoena? Names, please. What would you ask them? Which answers do you expect to get? Thank you to Oystein for the idea.
(playing Hannity) What are you saying? You can get names in the telephone book. We never said telephone books weren't made of paper. Contact the paper makers. They'll confirm the truth, or are you afraid? Dr. Pepper cans were found at the scene and everybody saw them. That proves 9/11 was the work of cave dwellers. Cave dwellers love Dr. Pepper. Everybody knows it, because it was on Fox news one time. Contact them, they'll tell you (if you're not too afraid to do so).
A simple answer would be nice: Whom would you subpoena? Names, please. What would you ask them? Which answers do you expect to get?
I'm not quite sure you understand what "feeding the troll" means. I think Han's post is a reasonable question and it affords truthers an opportunity to explain exactly who they think has the information they need to prove their case. Instead of taking that opportunity, RWF choose to behave like a troll himself. I'd say the majority of RWF's posts fit this description. RWF does not spend the majority of his time here contributing to threads. He invests the majority of his time in calling people government agents, of spreading disinformation, and making accusations of obfuscation. Ironically, in doing so proves himself guilty of many of his own charges.
"Contributing to threads", as you would characterize it, is pointless when dealing with shills. I get wound up in their inflammatory propaganda (as per original design). You're right Suede. I'll try and do better.
First, I would get every one of the several hundreds of structural engineers who worked at ground zero and ask them why they didn't report the complete lack of steel. I would want to interview all the firemen who didn't do ther job and who are clearly complicit in the desruction. Naturally the entire Bush staff from top to bottom, under oath and under hot lights. If they get to hot, we can always wheel out the waterboard.
Hunter.. the Ports Authority increased the number of floors for the WTC buildings.. They didn't follow the architect's design. Have you read anything about the architect or about any of the other buildings he designed?
Hmmm where to start? There are 28 pages from the Joint Congressional Inquiry Report about 9/11 that were withheld by the white house.. I'd start with those. I'd also ask Donald Rumsfeld under oathe what exactly he was doing between 9:03 and 9:37 a.m. and why he chose to do that after he learned that devestating attacks were currently unfolding in real time. I'd ask Jose Rodriguez from the CIA why he destroyed all those interrogation tapes despite the fact they had court orders not to and the 9/11 commission wanted to see them. Also from the FBI I would ask George Tenet, Kofer Black and Richard Blee what exactly they knew about hijackers al-Hazmi and al-Mihdhar prior to 9/11 and who they did or did not tell about it and why/why not. From the FBI I'd put Colleen Rowley on the hot seat so she can put her money where her mouth is and name the FBI supervisory agent she claims deliberatily altered the Moussaiu FISA warrant request.. Then naturally have a chat with this person. As far as what answers would I get? Probably a fair bulk of BS.
