evidently i know the meaning better than you, you asked me to prove something that i predicted outside of time travel, future events aren't able to be proven, you completely misused the word
it's a called a prediction, therefore you misused the word 'prove' ron paul will never be president of the united states this prediction is backed 100% by gold and silver [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQv0KtbeWXo"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQv0KtbeWXo[/ame] this is a golden oldie
That was a rigged question from George. Please post something relevant to the 2012 campaign, the one that Ron Paul is winning.
In that George asked a question in which Ron Paul had to predict the outcome of an election. Heres your stance on predicting: There, i edited it for you.
'rigged' as you put it, implies conducting something fraudulently what was rigged/fraudulent about the question?
The difference between Ron Paul and dujac? Ron Paul has to deal with being asked the same questions over and over even though he has answered them many times. Dujac has to deal with being asked the same questions over and over even though he has claimed to answer them without doing so.
how can i stop when i haven't done it? you're really having some problems with logic over there let me know when you find something accurate and pertinent to post
what is that supposed to mean? why should i? i've already read it several times, i understand its flaws very well meanwhile, if you come up with something relevant, let me know, i'm kind of busy over here
Just ignore Dujac he is simply a Troll who feeds off of people while being a hypocrite and deflecting answers/questions.
In theory a dead cat is electable if that's what the electorate vote for. In the case of Paul he might as well be a dead cat because there is no way that he'll gain the GOP nomination, let alone be elected. Paul might win a primary or two but that's as far as he'll go.