911 WTC World Trade Towers, Did Thermate do This?

Steel cannot 'turn to dust'.

Next.

 

see how rational the board argues that brawndo has electrolytes and it what plants crave?

That water is for the toilet and brawndo is for plants!

anyone can see that its hopeless for a truther to address matters with liahs!

it what plants crave!!!

 

Who said anything about the columns being gypsum?

Your animated gif is blotchy. You can see all kinds of blotches appear in the sky. Are they real or just part of your crappy gif.

Kind of like that other poster in this forum that likes to spam animated gifs. The similarities in the posting styles are quite apparent. Lots of smelly socks in here.

 

well they are columns and if they were not steel they had to be gypsum, since that is what he is claiming.

all you can do is complain that its not tack sharp? lame LOL

 

Idiocracy was just a silly assed movie

 

Where exactly did he claim that?

I have no problem with it not being tack sharp. It is amusing when people claim that the artifacts of their crappy gifs represent what they are claiming to have happened in reality.

The images of the columns losing clarity due to crappy graphics is not the same as them "turning into toothpicks" in real life. And the steel columns disappearing behind dust clouds of cement and gypsum do not equate to the steel columns turning to dust.

 

Try to pay attention. I do not claim the columns are made of gypsum and cement. I claim the dust you see is gypsum and cement. Do you not understand this?

You tell me. You're the one that goes on about mini nukes that aren't fission reactions or fusion reactions. Lord knows what the heck you think you're talking about. Do you talk to these aliens? Maybe you should ask them yourself.

Are you able to stay on topic without straying into absurd rants?

No you don't. You have steel dust that has a passivisation layer of oxidation on its surface area. This dust was either created slowly, or began as a spark of a larger piece of steel.

More annoying tangents. You show me steel that shows signs of turning to dust. Heck, show me any evidence at all of your claim besides a poor interpretation of a animated GIF on the internet.

Again, this is not the way it works. You think that steel turned to dust. You need to show the energy. That's the way it works.

English. Do you speak it? You claimed that "mini nukes" turned steel to dust in another thread. It's right here on the forum for folks to read.

In all bands? You have no idea what you're talking about. Typical. Space is literally filled with technology from multiple governments that monitor nuclear activity. Beyond that, New York is filled with people who work with or are required to wear radiation detection devices. No one made a peep about a spike in radiation.

You don't know what an EMP is either. This is turning out to be a pathetic argument here, Koko. EMP doesn't just make snow on TV and radio. It completely ruins electronic devices.

It works because the steel column has a higher terminal velocity then the dust. As the steel falls the dust remains in frame long after the steel has fallen out of frame.

Again, nowhere did I say columns were made of gypsum.

 

Again if the columns were not steel what do you think they were?

 

Dear Koko,

“The first rule of holes: When you're in one stop digging.”
― Molly Ivins

 

Yeh I keep trying to tell him that but he wont listen.

He has dug himself a nice one hasnt he

 

All that dustified steel has blurred your vision and made you lose your bearings koko. Try and get that z coordinate back to a positive number.

 

You should follow your own advice. The columns were steel. The dust was not steel. Remember when you were struggling with the definition of straw man? This is it. I did not say the columns were not steel. That's a little fantasy you invented so that you could argue about it.

Did aliens hack your account and post this thread?

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...thermate-used-cover-up-nukes.html#post4428171

Because someone with your screen name did say and imply that mini nukes were used.

Yeah. I know what a rant is. I know what an absurd rant is too. You tried to call me an idiot because Japan attacked America 70 years ago. If that's not an absurd rant I don't know what is.

I guess you don't understand the difference between physics and chemistry. Go figure.

Another fine example of a straw man. You should remember, you're the one that brought up your alien friends.

You see steel and you see dust. You don't see steel turning to dust. I explained why chemically, and you've done nothing but prattle on about aliens, pearl harbor, and any other thing you can think of to try and avoid explaining why you think I'm not right.

Quote where I said anything about Hiroshima.

What do you mean, if they had it? If they had what? As I told you, there was literally thousands of radiation detectors in the city. Medical workers are required to wear them. Millstone is right across the sound. They would have detected radiation. Radiation would have been detected from space by multiple countries. It didn't happen.

Fourth straw man of the post. You're on a roll. I didn't say EMP wipes out all electronics. The radios on the firemen would all be ruined. Electronics in nearby buildings would be ruined. Anything unshielded would be cooked. It didn't happen.

Your contention is that the steel "vanishes"? That's silly. The steel didn't vanish. It fell. It landed in a big pile at the base of the building. And it took weeks to cut up and clear away. It wasn't turned to dust.

Quote the post where I said, "the columns were not steel."

 

At this point I'm having a little trouble figuring out if he is really that stupid or if he just enjoys screwing with people.

I sincerely hope it is the latter.

 

I've long stopped caring what the intent some of the posters have in this forum, because it's frickin' hilarious no matter how it was intended.

 

but none of this steel turns to dust!

just wtc steel! LMAO


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sK50So-yYRU"]NOPE NO STEEL TO DUST IN ALL THESE DEMOS![/ame]


Look at all those demolitions man! not ONE of them turn steel to dust.

amazing!

Oh wait thats right no magic airplanes and jet fuel!

 

Neither did steel 'turn to dust' at the WTC collapses.

Everyone agrees.

 

Someone still believes steel 'turned to dust'? After the chemistry was cited that shows that impossibility?

What does that person think did it?

 

I've been watching you do that for weeks now.

But I still am not sure -- do you BELIEVE in the rubbish you are posting or are you just having fun messing with people? Because you certainly are not doing ANYTHING to promote the truthers cause or credibility.

 

well I am not a truther.

I am demolishing the official liars.

 

I do have to admit debate official bots is sort of well comical

 

Of course, idiots do find their own amusment in things..

 

but it didint show anything of the sort


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOEvkVVegEc"]Chemistry[/ame]

 

Is that the extent of your knowledge of chemistry?

 

What, pray tell, are you then?

 

A 'Troofer'