Well, this is basically a point in case for why rights shouldn't be up to popular vote, since the interest of fairness isn't necessarily the...
All the more reason to get more of em off the market so they're not married to wives they're not interested in and single and looking.
While I appreciate the sharing, I assume the reason you shared it was to express why you felt marriage wasn't such a big deal for homosexuals,...
You see no need for them to marry, but you did see fit for them to be able to have civil unions... to me, the reason why one would get a civil...
While homosexual's entire way of life has been on trial for decades (centuries?) in the courts, in the mental health profession, in this forum,...
Nobody forced you to be here :-P Somewhat irrelevant since american law is only concerned with its function today, but certainly a question...
Your positions seem to keep changing. Last post, you said the function of marriage was to support family. Now you seem to have changed that, and...
I'm not quite sure how you're linking the above statements to the current topic, but there's a few things I think I can say about it. 1. Given...
Ok then, you object to the decision because (assuming your agreement with Robert's reasoning), you believe that expanding marriage to same-sex is...
What a silly argument. Saying that not having the potential to procreate cannot be a limiting factor for marriage is not the same as saying risks...
The arc is long, but glad to see it bending in the right direction. Of course more work remains.
A matter of opinion I suppose. Philosophy and formal logic were my favorite courses in college, making me somewhat partial to addressing...
You asked about the administration and why the administration would do it, not why a person should. As a person hired to do a job by the...
I think supporters of same-sex marriage can and should support other "similarly situated" cases, or else risk being hypocrites guilty of doing the...
Maybe. Honestly I'm not sure what the goals are... if the goal is to not offend the country, then no. But if the goal is to promote desired change...
Separate names with a comma.
