Unbelievable. We have one thread from the left asking whether republicans will accept the Mueller investigation and this one saying the left is...
Just a first guess. It would take a fair amount of analysis to decide where to campaign.
Just less of an issue than in Nebraska.
Religion, guns and farm versus urban makes a big difference.
New York, California and Florida. Not all the biggest, but they stand a pretty good chance of swinging an election.
Why should we? The democrats are already saying Mueller has not gone far enough.
Sure they are. A rural corn and wheat farmer in Nebraska ha a completely different interest than a someone who lives in downtown LA.
And they will campaign in even less.
You can't show it isn't true. If you get he majority of the big states, it will just take a few of the...
But he can get enough of them so that the other states don't matter much.
They would count, but it would only be worthwhile for the candidates...
But they could do anything they want or not do anything in those small states because they would not longer count.
If they got rid of it, nearly 100 percent would be in about three states.
They won't campaign in those states and will not try to satisfy the needs of those states. They will only campaign in the most populous areas....
If it wasn't for the electoral college, presidential candidates would not campaign in the less populous states.
Don't blame the EC for Hilary's...
So you believe she did not know the server was in her closet? Noted.
That is a rather silly argument. That would require she did not know the server was in her closet.
Separate names with a comma.