https://chipstero7.wordpress.com/ Below is 0.1% of 100%: The theories that I’ll be proposing in this article are controversial and deal with...
The IPCC logarithmic equation (as quoted above in the graph) predicts a total greenhouse warming for CO2 of 32 W/sq.m. The total greenhouse...
[IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
I have provided sources, but links are gonna hard on an image. I wouldn't know how to do that.
Below is a CAGW-skeptical handbook I recently made on Infogram if anyone is interested in reading it (or even using it in debates). [IMG]
Below is a graph I put together of instrumental ECS estimates between 2012 to 2018 and it seems that ECS is getting smaller. [IMG]
Changes in cloud-cover is one possibility. There have been large increases in shortwave radation reaching the surface due cloud-cover since 1980...
Why can't the climate change of present be natural also?
Regardless of what you feel about conspiracies and weak-minded people, the 97% consensus figure has yet to be proven.
You haven't fallen for the "97% consensus" PR, have you?
True. They've never proved that CO2-emissions have anything other than an insignificant effect on the climate.
Richard Evans on Quora
Separate names with a comma.
