- Last Activity:
- Jul 16, 2018 at 5:24 PM
- Joined:
- Oct 23, 2015
- Messages:
- 22,705
- Likes Received:
- 5,914
- Trophy Points:
- 113
Followers 4
- Location:
- NW Ohio
TOG 6
Well-Known Member, from NW Ohio
N/A Mar 9, 2017
- TOG 6 was last seen:
- Viewing thread Trump tax cuts 6 months later:it is exactly what critics predicted- Only the rich benefit., Jul 16, 2018 at 5:24 PM
- Loading...
- Loading...
-
About
- Location:
- NW Ohio
- Pets:
- Smith & Wesson, Springfield, Browning, DPMS, Remington, Savage, Ruger, Winchester
- Gender:
- Male
- Country flag:
- usa
- State/region flag:
- uk scotland
According to Mother Jones (link below), 'assault weapons' accounted for 258 mass shooting deaths deaths 1982-2017, for 7.37 deaths per year.
7.37 deaths per year represents 0.05% of total murders in the US and 0.07% of all firearm related murders in the US.
Further, this 258 total deaths by 'assault weapons' in mass shootings 1982-2017 represents 37.6% of total deaths in mass shootings. The most common weapon? Handguns.
In compiling this information from the MJ spreadsheet was as inclusive as I could be - for instance, some events involved the use of a Mini-14/30, which are not necessarily 'assault weapons', but I included them in the total; others included the TEC-9 and MAC-11, which are oversized handguns rather than rifles.
Tens of millions of 'assault weapons' in the US, ~7.4 murders per year over the last 35 years?
More proof that there's no sound argument to ban 'assault weapons'.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/12/mass-shootings-mother-jones-full-dataInteract
Signature
UPDATE: The truth about 'assault weapons' and mass shootings in the US:
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-weapons-and-mass-shootings-un-the-us.522928/
Funny how those who want to ban these guns fully avoid this discussion.
